Nuclearus - New Build - Benchmarks

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

06-05-2007, 09:37 AM
Mad_Man

Quote:

Originally Posted by SOLDNER-MOFO64

Might we see 8K on an AMD soon?

MAYBE in soon time, im building my first WC loop so i hope for better clocks. But mem is holding me back, core can go higher but i have to set higher divider, so mem ends at 440 which's not good
06-05-2007, 10:21 AM
Jaan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Locki

So, version has been updated to 2.0.0. rc1 [/url]

welcome to program autor :toast:
another link for fast download
06-05-2007, 11:21 AM
SOLDNER-MOFO64

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad_Man

You want it, you get it lol :D

did litle tweakin'

MAYBE in soon time, im building my first WC loop so i hope for better clocks. But mem is holding me back, core can go higher but i have to set higher divider, so mem ends at 440 which's not good

I think we must have an ore each buddy, I'm in the same boat with you :)

Very nice score you've got there..:up: ..can't wait to see your water-cooled numbers :yepp:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaan

welcome to program autor :toast:

Indeed.....I never even noticed :welcome:
06-05-2007, 01:27 PM
Mad_Man

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by SOLDNER-MOFO64

I think we must have an ore each buddy, I'm in the same boat with you :)

Very nice score you've got there..:up: ..can't wait to see your water-cooled numbers :yepp:

I was in bed and cant sleep, thinking about it and...
...i went nuts...
set all fans to full blast, upped Vcore and Vmem a little and WHAT I GOT???

FIRST AMD 8K+ :D :D

keep in mind this ram is curently running at 520Mhz, 5-5-5-9 2.3V and is rated at 333Mhz 4-4-4-9 2.1V

I feel good now, i can go sleep :yepp:

btw, very nice progam this benchmark :)
06-05-2007, 03:08 PM
SOLDNER-MOFO64

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad_Man

I was in bed and cant sleep, thinking about it and...
...i went nuts...
set all fans to full blast, upped Vcore and Vmem a little and WHAT I GOT???

FIRST AMD 8K+ :D :D

keep in mind this ram is curently running at 520Mhz, 5-5-5-9 2.3V and is rated at 333Mhz 4-4-4-9 2.1V

I feel good now, i can go sleep :yepp:

btw, very nice progam this benchmark :)

:shocked: Congrats mate......klassic score :up: :party:
06-05-2007, 04:55 PM
Lancer33

3 Attachment(s)

Why are there so many different version listed in the results. Does not seem like a valid example of performance when there is so much disparity between versions and older versions continue to be used after newer ones come out.

Anyway, pick the one you like:
06-05-2007, 11:45 PM
Mad_Man

Quote:

Originally Posted by SOLDNER-MOFO64

:shocked: Congrats mate......klassic score :up: :party:

thanx man, its really a pleasure to see that big red text after my nick :) :D
i though it will bsod at thoose Mhz but yesterday was a cold night ;) so it worked.

I hope with water it will be my 24/7 OC, now im running 24/7 at 3050/509
these new Brisbanes have big OC potential
06-06-2007, 01:55 AM
Hachi_Roku

1 Attachment(s)

actual specs @cpu-z
moderate o/c
06-06-2007, 07:11 AM
dj883u2

QX6700@3800Ghz:

http://img481.imageshack.us/img481/4669/45807441uw0.jpg

By;)
06-07-2007, 12:40 AM
Locki

dj883u2 and Hachi_Roku try it in new version (2.0.0.0)
06-07-2007, 09:48 AM
dj883u2

New E6600@4100Ghz:

http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/3912/16333290ed8.jpg

By:)
06-08-2007, 12:23 AM
Cheffy

repost of my result from the OCUK forums (im registered as Amonlym there, as they banned Cheffy account for sig problem :(

http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/3372/8218ys5.jpg

athlon x2 4800+ (939) @ 3100@ 1.625v (12*258 ram at 258 3-3-3-8 1T) - suicide run, attempted at 3120 but locked up on multi thread

abit AX8 rev2, LCB9E X2 4800+, 2*1gig crucial pc4000

cooling is koolance 2pc601 w cpu305 (x1800xt and north bridge also in loop)
06-08-2007, 12:29 AM
Mad_Man

congrats Cheffy, it looks like the extra cache helps here :) or maybe its because Brisbanes have higher latency L2.
Whats your 24/7_settings score?
06-08-2007, 12:57 AM
Cheffy

7768, thats at 2920, (12*243).

i dont think ill be able to get anything else out of this cpu tho. 3124 locks up without fail in a few seconds. so i doubt 3112 will run...

can try the ram on a lower div, but 281 3-3-3-8 1T is asking a lot from 5B-F, my old sticks managed that, just. new ones dont seem to scale as well with volts tho, and there seems to be a mobo bug - setting 2.9v+ seems to sometimes give 3.25v for no reason, which is gonna kill the ram very quickly.
06-08-2007, 09:03 AM
SOLDNER-MOFO64

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cheffy

7768, thats at 2920, (12*243).

i dont think ill be able to get anything else out of this cpu tho. 3124 locks up without fail in a few seconds. so i doubt 3112 will run...

can try the ram on a lower div, but 281 3-3-3-8 1T is asking a lot from 5B-F, my old sticks managed that, just. new ones dont seem to scale as well with volts tho, and there seems to be a mobo bug - setting 2.9v+ seems to sometimes give 3.25v for no reason, which is gonna kill the ram very quickly.

Nice one cheffy....great score.

I notice you're running an HTx of 4 still......have you tried dropping to 3x to see if it stops your lockups at 31++mhz? Just a thought :)
06-08-2007, 10:11 AM
FlawleZ

My lowly A64 4000+

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...ar3095High.jpg
06-08-2007, 01:51 PM
SOLDNER-MOFO64

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlawleZ

My lowly A64 4000+

Scooped you number 3 spot for SC AMD, can't be bad ;)

updated :)
06-08-2007, 04:01 PM
GOZ

1 Attachment(s)

Here's mine with Utorrent and my antivirus running in the background, LMAO my Sig is way off
06-08-2007, 04:04 PM
Turrican

//edit: i think we have a new AMD sc cpu record here :toast: :D

http://www.directupload.net/images/070608/K8ioeIfM.jpg
06-08-2007, 05:00 PM
SOLDNER-MOFO64

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOZ

Here's mine with Utorrent and my antivirus running in the background, LMAO my Sig is way off

good score, cheers

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turrican

//edit: i think we have a new AMD sc cpu record here :toast: :D

Congrats buddy......very nice score indeed :up:

updated
06-08-2007, 06:40 PM
uwackme

hmmm

Here's mine at 3.25Ghz.

http://<a href="http://imageshack.us...tresultji1.jpg[/IMG]

But at 3.5Ghz it hits 8853.
06-08-2007, 09:53 PM
Kaze06

http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/291/nucuo0.th.jpg

AMD Athlon XP 3200+ @ 2385MHz
06-09-2007, 04:29 AM
dj883u2

E6600@4165Ghz:

NuclearMC.v.1.5.0.b2

http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/2708/75503898de3.jpg

NuclearMC.v.2.0.0RC1

http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/9894/91929588hi1.jpg

By:up:
06-09-2007, 08:30 AM
demonbane23

Here we go --> x2 6000+ @ 3.3 --ill bench it at 3.4 in a bit... but so far

http://xs116.xs.to/xs116/07236/nucleausscore.jpg
06-09-2007, 09:50 AM
SOLDNER-MOFO64

Quote:

Originally Posted by uwackme

Here's mine at 3.25Ghz. But at 3.5Ghz it hits 8853.

Nice score buddy

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaze06

http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/291/nucuo0.th.jpg

AMD Athlon XP 3200+ @ 2385MHz

Good one buddy..cheers

Quote:

Originally Posted by dj883u2

E6600@4165Ghz: By:up:

That's strange.....most guys get a higher score with version 2.0.

I notice your two matrix segments are really low on the version 2.0 run mate....perhaps an error?

Quote:

Originally Posted by demonbane23

Here we go --> x2 6000+ @ 3.3 --ill bench it at 3.4 in a bit... but so far

great score mate :)

updated

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page