very nice fafi Alex.
Congrats..
Pinoy Powah ^_^
Printable View
very nice fafi Alex.
Congrats..
Pinoy Powah ^_^
wew more and more of us playing this game... wish i still have the time to do spi 32m
It seems that my previous posts was lost during XS migration....i was too busy to submit it again, but here i am with my first sub7, made with my friend Casimir37 (more to see here)
6.xx
5075.2......Benji Tshi & Casimir37............6.59.797....29x175 ....1050mhz.....7-7-6-20....2/12..X58
http://img249.imageshack.us/img249/8...9797calque.jpg
And here is the data which was lost...
7.xx
4400.4......Benji Tshi............7.57.093.....24x183 ....1100mhz.....7-8-7-20....2/12..X58
http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/7883/sub84400mhz.jpg
First bench with Perfect Storm Elpida Hyper, and not enough time to do it...I will try it again soon i hope, and i'll aim ~4360
Under SS, -45°
8.xx
3868.9......Benji Tshi............8.59.931.....20x193 ....967mhz.....6-7-7-18....2/10..X58
http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/5043/tz83868mhz.jpg
8.xx
3453.6......Benji Tshi............9.59.625s.....18x192 ....959mhz.....6-7-7-18....2/10..X58
http://img512.imageshack.us/img512/3316/tz93453mhz.jpg
Done with the same Perfect Storm, but aircooling (so uclk is lower like memory frequency)
Ι thinh Βenji that the Perfect Storm are Perfect...!
Nooo...., you're sure ?? :D :D
4424.3......cheapseats.........09.59.953...7.5x590 .....944mhz.....7-6-5-15....5/8...X48
all extra speed compared to my 09.59.906 :: 4431.5mhz run is from using a different pi_rec.dat2... :yepp:
now it seems that there are at least three 32M run types determined by the pi_rec file, which affect Inital value,
Loop times, Loop 24 to finish and overall speed. the same difference also shows without waza.
XP sp2 / LSC on / core 1 affinity / realtime / explorer closed / 512-512 page file / 1 disk / 2 partition /
maxmem 680 / SpiTweaker v1.0 CDT (680MB file) D>C (SPi C) / pi_rec.dat2 cheap 'speed' version :woot:
http://i447.photobucket.com/albums/q...9m59x_0403.gif
did this run first on 0401 and got the same finish time as 3oh6's 4424.3mhz :D
click for larger image
http://i447.photobucket.com/albums/q..._32M_9mx_t.gif
awesome work cheapseats. Any clues on what to look for with the different pirec.dat? Were you running 16K to get it or another size?
I was actually trying to take this timezone, but you beat me to it :)
thanks buddy :) i only beat 3oh6 by 0.016s, so it hasn't moved the target much.. the cpuz clock will drop to 4424.2mhz but not everest so i wanted to go a touch faster to nip in ahead :D
the pi_rec i'm using now has 16k = 0.078, 1M = 11.5x, 32M = 9m19x, and it's been sitting unused on a spare disk since february.. just used the disk again for some tests and the runs were faster than i expected. Thought it was the effect of a 2 disk setup at first, but after testing it turned out to be the pi_rec. The 4424mhz runs i posted were with 1 disk using a copy of the fast pi_rec from the spare.
don't know what's in the file that is relevant to the outcome, but @ 9.xx clocks its ~1s faster than if i use my usual pi_rec (16k=0.078s). Both files give Low initials, but one of them is 0.5s faster up to Lp 24 and 0.5s faster Lp 24 to finish.
been trying to find out what was causing my slow down in Lp 24-to-finish since i replaced my OS a while ago and no idea that i'd lost another 0.5s on top too :eek: check out how my 24 to finish time tightens up between the 4431mhz run (~20.6s) and 4424mhz run (~20.1) both with same setup etc - just different pi_rec.
hope i can work out how to produce another fast pi_rec from scratch, otherwise i will just post the file i already have :)
btw, there is a hardware-based way to get 589x7.5 or even 588, but it needs quite high vdimm to run all the subtimings and tRCD5
here's my test run without waza or subtimings (or fast pi_rec). haven't finished a full-fat run yet though.
589x7.5 / 942mhz / 7-5-5-15 / tRFC 60 / vDIMM 2.25V set
http://i447.photobucket.com/albums/q..._32M_10m08.gif
5982......Moonman............7.59.218.....10x598 ....957Mhz.....7-6-6-24....5/8..X48
Had some fun with RE:up:
Memory chips are D9JNJ and these timings are as low as they can go. 2.2 Vdimm
But I guess it ain't bad for ~40$/2GB
http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/8058/lowclocksub8.jpg
12.xx
3395.5......kintaro............12.56.256s.....7x48 5 ....970mhz.....8-7-7-22....1/2..X48
my first attempt with CSX DIABLO.
11.xx
3720.6......kintaro............11.58.396s.....8x46 5 ....930.2mhz.....7-7-7-21....1/2..X48
10.xx
4131.1......kintaro............10.57.104s.....8.5x 486 ....972.1mhz.....8-7-7-22....1/2..X48
i7 965+REX2+Adata 3*1gb+some reg tweaks
9,xx
http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/9317/9598752.jpg
12.xx
3347.2......kintaro............12.58.252s.....6x55 8....929.8mhz.....7-8-5-20....3/5..X48
7.xx
4643.9......Marcolecorse............7.51.172....21 x221 ....884mhz.....8-8-8-20....2/8..X58
http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/5929/spi32.jpg
great run Marco very good i920
11.xx
3693.9......coop..............11.59.453s.....7x527 ....633.2mhz.....5-5-4-8....5/6..P45
hardware noted below, maxmem 600, lsc, 1gb waza, pagefile 500/500, realtime
[IMG]http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/9...xxfinal32m.jpg[/IMG]
12.xx
3276.1......kintaro............12.59.359s.....6x54 6....910mhz.....7-6-5-15....3/5..X48
http://www.hwbot.org/signature/u12490.png
12.xx
3264.5......kintaro............12.59.953s.....6x54 4....906.8mhz.....7-6-5-15....3/5..X48
this is my best run so far. i think Diablo's have no more to give.
http://www.hwbot.org/signature/u12490.png
Here 's sub 19 minutes for the green team:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...y/32Msub19.jpg
Much room for improvement and i'm sure DDR3 will slaughter this score but i'm prepared for a little challenge. :D
Hoping to get sub 18 min soon.
12.xx
3264.5......kintaro............12.58.641s.....6x54 4....906.8mhz.....7-5-5-15....3/5..X48
Memory speed reported in cpu-z is wrong due to bugged divider ....
In reality it's about 816 ,mhz .
5864......Moonman............7.59.703.....9.5x617. 3 ....987.6Mhz.....7-6-6-15....5/8..X48
http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/294...597035864m.jpg
5030.7......Moonman............8.59.813.....8.5x59 1.3 ....946.9Mhz.....7-6-5-15....5/8..X48
http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/4...598135030b.jpg
Made a video of last two iterations. :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjkVC5wAqOQ
Here is sub 18 minutes for the green team:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...2Msub18min.jpg
Specs in sig.
12.xx
3259.9......kintaro..........12.59.422s......6x543 ...905.5mhz.....7-5-5-14....3/5..X48
11.xx
3900.1......CryptiK............11.58.140s.....7.5x 520....624Mhz.....5-5-5-15....5/6....P45
http://i266.photobucket.com/albums/i...z11m58140s.jpg
7.xx
4378.1......TinTin............7.59.922s.....21x208 .5....1042.4mhz.....7-7-6-19....2/10..X58
http://img357.imageshack.us/img357/9318/sub8min.jpg
8.xx
4405.0......mdobem............8.36.427s.....21x209 .8..........839.1mhz.....8-8-8-24....2/8..X58
http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/8137/superpi32m836.jpg
updated 7.xx, 8.xx, and 9.xx entries with 2k+ cas 6 on the R2E
i7 920 D0 + Corsair Dominator GTs on R2E
vanilla Windows XP SP3 with most services off
waza 1.9GB C: --> D:, D:--->C:, C:--> D:on .bat file run from desktop shortcut
7.xx
4359.8......alex_tpc............7.59.641....21x207 ....1038mhz.....6-7-6-18....2/10..X58
http://i404.photobucket.com/albums/p...1x207_6_sm.jpg
btw, got the evga classified 760 recently. can't run those mems with 2K+ even with cas 7 or 8 with the same proc on the classified even with high vtt. my proc's imc is probably not good enough for the classified or (and?) the classified really sucks with high uncore or(and?) i haven't played with it enough. edit: turns out to be due to a bad dimm slot on the classified :shakes:.
Really crazy CL6 over DDR3 2000:eek:, how much Vdimm you used? :clap:
8.xx
3864.9.......TinTin............8.59.422....19x203. 4 ....1017mhz.....7-7-6-19....2/10..X58
http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/6...0612011531.jpg
Can't wait to get in the race again, really. I am expecting good memories and a proper cooling and i'll post. Because at the moment it is ridiculous :p::p:
Good results over here :up:
alright guys, i think it is apparent i can't continue to update this thread. my year and a half is up doing so and it is time someone else took over. guys can't seem to follow the few simple things i ask for and i just don't have time to keep up with all of these entries. life is too busy for me right now and that isn't going to change any time soon.
so if you want to keep the the SPi Low-Clock Challenge alive, fire me a PM and i will give you a quick run-down on how to make it happen. only a couple simple steps really.
Hoping everthing is doing OK your side ! Even beter !!
Man, take care and please if you could, stay at the command :D
Alex_tpc > Amazing memory :up: What's this ? Sorted Hypers or...?
3oh6 > Sorry to hear you're leaving, i hope you'll find a good guy to replace you :p:
guilty as charged :sofa:. separating the posts to follow one score per post request from page 1.
8.xx
3842.6......alex_tpc............8.59.562....19x202 ....1011mhz.....6-7-6-18....2/10..X58
http://i404.photobucket.com/albums/p..._17x202_sm.jpg
[separating the posts to follow one score per post request from page 1]
9.xx
3427.1......alex_tpc............9.59.922....17x201 ....1008mhz.....6-7-6-18....2/10..X58
http://i404.photobucket.com/albums/p...7x201_6_sm.jpg
8.xx
3848.1......TinTin............8.59.797....19x202.5 ....1012.6mhz.....7-7-6-19....2/10..X58
http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/2...mhzsub8min.jpg
12.xx
3528.0......CryptiK............12.59.172.....7x504 ....604.8Mhz.....5-5-5-15....5/6....P45
http://i720.photobucket.com/albums/w...m593528MHz.jpg
i don't have money to buy good mems :(
this is the best i can do with the rated 1600mhz cas7 mems :D
7.xx
4419.8......DJSUB............7.58.703....21x210 ....1052mhz.....8-9-7-18....2/10..X58
http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/8...mhzspi32m7.jpg
Ok folks, I thought about it for a few days and had a nice alk with Jody and according to the fact that nobody else stepped up so far it`s my turn now. Fortunately I update many lists at other forums (partially for years), so I know how much work to expect. The reason I am into 32M and try to improve my efficiency also is helpful for sure.
I will try to do my job as good as Jody, because he really did a great job here. :clap: I am sure you all agree at this point.
But something has to change, so prepare for the following steps:
- To update the thread regularly and use the edit function I have to create a new thread. I will copy & paste the rules, the results and the thread title, so basically nothing will change.
- ...except for the AMD part. The results are not linked and there are also no informations about memory details or chipset available atm. I will cancel this old part and create a new one for AMD results. It is the better solution for future results.
- Of course the newer results we have seen here and were not added to the list already will be added to the new one.
Any ideas or wishes? Just leave a message here, drop me a PN or even look at the contact info at my profile. :yepp:
Regards,
Stephan
Stephan I know how hard Jody worked, I'm also involved with Greek SPi 32M LCC, basically the one who started it and keeps it clean :) (you already know it I know :D, I'm just saying ;)) I know how much work has to be done and in case you want some help, I'm prepared to help for sure. I'm a 100% in with what you mentioned about AMD list. If you want me to help you can discuss it with Jody and then find me on msn ;) :up:
12.xx
3254.9......kintaro..........12.59.375s......6x542 .5 ...904.2mhz.....7-5-5-14....3/5..X48
11.xx
3551.0......kintaro..........11.59.750s......6x591 .8 ...946.9mhz.....7-6-5-15....5/8..X48
Testing my new Corsair.
10.xx
3952.0......kintaro..........11.59.578s......8x494 .0 ...987.9mhz.....7-6-5-15....1/2..X48
09.xx
4424.3......kintaro..........11.59.969s......7.5x5 89.9 ...943.8mhz.....7-6-5-15....5/8....X48
very good job and very good cpu!!!
congratulations:):)
The new thread has opened: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post3875305
Please post there, Jody won`t update anymore this old thread. :)