Try adjusting clockgen in Windows to get faster speeds.
Printable View
Try adjusting clockgen in Windows to get faster speeds.
Mayk-Freak, wow that is seriously impressive. whats the volts on those chips? Are you watercooling that CPU?
I'm a bit of a techy... I knew this trick... max stable I get is 2.77ghz so I just leave it set to 230x12 and unless I'm benching I'm leaving it.Quote:
Originally Posted by TxAg
Results from the Dothan vs 3.2EE Oc'd to 3.6
3dMark05 - Nearly breaking 6k (Note on my 3.2EE Oc'd to 3.6 and the same settings I could not break 5814, so nearly 150 increase in score and I'm about 800mhz slower on the cpu!!!
Pic1
Next a 3dMark01 run previously this was 24,347 with my 3.2EE Oc'd to 3.6. Now with the Dothan 29760.
Pic2
Next 1M superpimod runs. Before I could not get past 36.5s, now with the Dothan, I'm at 27.3s. That's a pretty nice increase!
Pic3
Finally 32M superpimod. Pic of the old 32M score, Previous best 35m44s
Pic4
Now with the Dothan 26m51.906s knocking nearly 9minutes off!!!
Pic5
Overall stability is great, I've run Prime95 for over an hour with temps getting up to 54c. Keep in mind this processor is rated at 1.375v and I'm juicing it 1.50-152v under load. Idle temps are around 38c, with 24c ambient temps
I read on Intels sight this processor has a max operating temp of 100c, Am I missing somthing... those are insane temps!!!
Next steps are waiting for a 50k Ohm pot to do the vdroop mod. I'm planning on max of 1.8v, which should translate to about 1.75v at load. Assuming temps don't go too insane! For now I'm happy with the swap and will most likely be selling my 3.2EE since every aspect of my computing experience is faster now! Well I assume multitasking would be slowed now, but maybe not, not sure how I could check that!
try to do an ecoding round, i am sure that 3.2 EE with HT will win...
the perfect cpu is dothan dual core with HT, maybe a yonah with HT is possible?
I know I'm sitting here wondering why Intel never put one of these on a 1066FSB platform with an dual core... I mean honestly this thing rocks... I'm totally impressed. :banana:Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunin
and the best think is the price... now i have a 740@2640mhz 1.4v on stock cooling, and i am scoring better than an FX-57!!! payed only 800€ less than an FX :D
i will pay 300€ for a 1,6ghz yonah with HT, clock at 2400mhz is enought for everything!!!
that's the chip not the boardQuote:
Originally Posted by Sunin
have you set 400fsb jumpers on the ct479?
they should let you boot up to around 250mhz
Yes my CPU ist watercooled by Nexxxus XP and is set in BIOS on 1,7 V. I have already get really good Ballistix Tracers and there is a voltage of 2,9 V. In addition 120 mm fans.
no actually I had set the 533 jumpers originallly and the silly thing won't boot.... rightnow I have no jumpers set... I'll try the 400. Well even at 400 the max I could set the FSB is 240ish... Its just a limit of the mobo...Quote:
Originally Posted by lawrywild
Last week we had a storm here in Brisbane, Aust.
I lost my golden Banias and a 512M stick of TCC4 Samsung ram.
I'm not going to bother getting another setup as I'm off to London next Friday :)
It's been fun mucking around with PMs. Thanks for the thrills.
Ryan
Does it get much worse than going from Australia in the summer to London in the winter? I think not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banzai
Did you try to feed it with more volts ? Micron memory usually likes around 3.3-3.5V.Quote:
Originally Posted by lawrywild
ahem... no it really doesnt....Quote:
Originally Posted by caligula
more like 2.7-2.9v.... :rolleyes:
I thought 6800 Ultra suppose to be faster than X800 Pro?
My score : 3dMark 05, 03, 01 / 6011, 15326, 32079
P-M 740 @ 200x13=2.6Ghz w/ X800 Pro 12 pipelines @ 540core/580mem
im trading my 6800le for the same card
so @ ur clocks and cpu speed, it's looking very nice, as I should be able to push higher with my 760 :D
Well my core and mem is at 415/575, so it is not surprise you eeked out my Ultra even with 16 pipes. I'm still monkeying around some... the system seems to hit a wall of diminishing returns much above 230 fsb, so I need to play with it some. I also think I have a 6k + run in the system as is, just need to finish tweaking a few things. You've got some really nice scores for a lesser processor and less pipelines, some of that might have to do with your memory settings as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by justthinking
Yep, I have a P4P800SE w/ ATI card, so the best I can do is running the system at 200FSB in order to get full PAT.
My processor can do higher, tried 210x13=2.73 and 225x12=2.7, yet it perform the best at 200x13 w/ full PAT and tightest memory timing of 2-2-2-5.
just increase the FSB after booting @ 200, with setfsb for example ;) you will keep pat full enable .
lowest I can go memory wise is 2335 so that is some of the reason for the difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by justthinking
Not possible w/ ATI cards, won't get pci/agp lock if boot at 200.Quote:
Originally Posted by 200%absolut
Does get lock at 201 and above, but no true PAT if not boot up at 200.
BTW, anyone here has an unused ct-479 stock cooler they want to sell?
YHPM on HSFQuote:
Originally Posted by justthinking
Boot at 199 - you get full PAT and locks.Quote:
Originally Posted by justthinking
266 divider gives 1:1
333 divider gives 4:5
secondedQuote:
Originally Posted by wwwww
was just about to say the same
Are you really sure about this? For all boards?Quote:
Originally Posted by lawrywild
For me this seems not to be the case for my P4P800-SE based system..
Yes.. the "locks" kicks in at 199, 201 for my XT800 PE, not for 200.. and PAT is disabled/performance are similar ("slow") for all three choises..
This board/Bios (1009.004) enables PAT only when RAM-speed is set to DDR500 (or DDR533) as stated in "Stryg's" sticky..
My P4P800-E Dlx "rig" behaves as you ("wwww" and "Lawrywild") explains though..
Well mine was with a P4P800se...Quote:
Originally Posted by TL1000S