1503 doesn't affect cas @411 fsb ( but stuck @451 mhz 4.05 ghz grrrrrrrrr )
my rig PC6400 cas 4 :
http://img286.imageshack.us/img286/3...chemem1ym4.png
my rig PC6400 cas 3:
http://img124.imageshack.us/img124/9...chemem3cz6.png
Printable View
1503 doesn't affect cas @411 fsb ( but stuck @451 mhz 4.05 ghz grrrrrrrrr )
my rig PC6400 cas 4 :
http://img286.imageshack.us/img286/3...chemem1ym4.png
my rig PC6400 cas 3:
http://img124.imageshack.us/img124/9...chemem3cz6.png
I know what it fixes, I know how to use the search :rolleyes: , I just want to know if the C2 revision is named as ip965. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Falkentyne
Hi everyone... I've been watching this thread for a few days and I decided to join... Thanks everyone for all the wonderful info...
I've been working on overclocking my rig...
This is what I've got so far
MB: Asus P5W DH Deluxe @ 400MHz FSB @1.65V MHC
CPU: Core 2 Duo E6400 @ 400x8=3200 @1.475V
2x1GB Transcend Jetram 667 @ 600MHz
The memory is not stable @ 800Mhz even if I increase the voltage for it. Suggestions appreciated. There is no other setting between 600 and 800 MHz for 400MHz motherboard clock.
My CPU load temp is 70 C according to ASUS PC Probe and 75 C according to Core Temp Beta 0.93, Cooled by a thermalright ultra 120 with an ultrasilent Enermax 12mm fan @ 950 rpm and 3 lian li 120mm fans on my lian li V2000 II case @ 1000 rpm. The whole system is whisper-quiet
I think this is it for me... Maybe if there are any suggestions memorywise, I'll try doing something with it...
BTW... People claiming they got 30something C load temps @ ~1.5 V with very quiet ~5000rpm !!!! fans are probably lying... There is no way this can happen.
Also, Orthos didn't work for me... It gave me stable results for hours @ 400 MHz motherboard clock, 3.2 CPU and 800MHz memory, all on stock (auto) voltage while two instances of prime would give me errors and my system wasn't stable while working... So, orthos users beware... Try using two primes ;)
Hmm 1503 is an improvement in some respects for me & my Geil ram. I can now set timings manually up to around 375 fsb after that things go screwy. Can't overclock as high as I could with 1407 or 1102 though.
Hi all, im trying to update my BIOS to 1503, but unsuccesfull...
I've the 1305, i've already try during the POST by pressing Alt+F2 and by EZ Flash 2 in bios but always give me a error :(
When i try during the POST it gives me an error message that can't flash bios, and during the EZ Flash 2 in bios it gives me the message " No Boot Signature Found in File", as anyone know what this is about??? Im triyng to flash with a USB pen like i always did...
Sorry my bad english :slap:
Ty all!!!
I updated my 1407 BIOS to the 1503 today using the AsusUpdate utility from within windows. I rebooted, loaded setup defaults in the BIOS, rebooted again and then did my BIOS settings... No error messages whatsoever. Everything went like clockwork.
1503 is a much better BIOS than 1407 in all respects.
Well i can't update bios from AsusUpdate utility from windows because ive a creative X-fi soundcard, and is a known issue that asus update cannot work when you have a creative soundcard installed, but thx anyway...Quote:
Originally Posted by Pol1977
Any help would be great...
Did you clear cmos after flashing to 1503 and reset to default setting then reboot and go back into bios and play with your new setting this is what I did.Quote:
Originally Posted by roger_h99.nor
Also I have legacy usb off and my cpu x9 fsb 336 @1.28 v ( I know fsb is nt that high but all I want is 3 ghz out of this board). My corsair 8500 @ 1008 mhz 2.2 volts 4-3-4-4 2t. FSB volts at 1.3 and PCI E at 110 ( I prob can put it back to 100 will try it later).
Not sure if any of this helps you but good luck.
Use autoruns from SysInternals to deactivate all Creative entries in the Logon tab. Reboot, install ASUS Update and flash the BIOS, don't immediately reboot. Reactivate the CL entries w/ Autoruns and reboot.Quote:
Originally Posted by z3r0_pt
Hi all.Quote:
Originally Posted by pee4
As I've suspected, my new 600W power supply unit didn't solved the boot issue :(
I've suspected, because a lack of power suply at boot time should definitely give me issues at load time, I keep thinking that this is related to energy saving or power control or whatever name I should call the mobo features that turns off the monitor after idle a while.
I think I will give a try for the 1503, because once booted, the system is really stable (I call 32 hours pretty stable, even for orthos):
http://img120.imageshack.us/img120/7577/systemqr9.png
I am going to travel for a week, so I let you know about the 1503 when I'm back.
I'm lovin' 1503.
I played around with 1503 and found that at 405fsb (I also tried 399) that if I set the memory speed setting to 810mhz then I cant set the memory timings to anything other than by spd or the board will not boot even if I set them to the same settings as by spd sets.
However if I set the memory speed to the one slower I think its 610mhz or the one higher something like 1050mhz the board boots fine with manual memory settings.
Strange.
I couldn't wait... so I´ve flashed 1503 and... it finally booted without the need to clear the CMOSQuote:
Originally Posted by abaldo
:banana: :toast: :banana:
I just need to make sure that the "mandatory CMOS clear to boot" issue has been solved completely, but this will take time...
I am running another orthos test, and here is the results:
IDLE
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/4...temidletw0.png
LOAD for 5 minutes
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/8...oad5minpe2.png
LOAD for 23 minutes
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/6...ad23minah6.png
SuperPi 1M (<17 seconds):
http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/2154/superpiip6.png
Now running:
CPU @ 9x343 auto vcore (1.21V 56~58ºC CoreTemp; 1.29V 47~50ºC SpeedFan);
DDR2 @ 515 (still SPD - didn't tried manual yet) auto vdimm (don´t know how to measure yet)
:eek: PSU 450W!!!!!!! :eek:
After I get my required stability, I will start following the guides and do the mods and laps too see how far I can 7x24 OC.
I've just retested Doom3 with all settings on max and again, no problem at all
Now I am very happy again! :woot:
For what it's worth, I flashed 1503 downloaded from ASUS' FTP using afudos and a bootable USB drive. Some of you reported issues with checksums but I had no problems here. Running at my usual overclock, no time to test anything differently at the moment.
Ok, ill will try that, i let you know if went everything ok.Quote:
Originally Posted by Grendel66
thx for helping :toast:
Didn't work either :( :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by z3r0_pt
Any help???
To all people using Orthos: Did you try using two instances of Prime?
There is a known issue and it has happened to me, that Orthos will show a stable configuration while prime will give errors/lockups.
Checking with conventional means (running games, rendering etc) showed me that Orthos-stable is not actually stable while two instances of prime stable IS stable.
All you have to do is have two folders with prime in them, run both primes, set them to use one cpu core each and do your tests.
It would be interesting to see how many of the so called stable overclocks described by people using orthos would survive.
Remember, it's not about showing off, it's about stability first, speed second ;)
Already Done!!!:banana: The problem was my flash drive :slap:Quote:
Originally Posted by z3r0_pt
Sry for my questions kinda noobie :slapass:
Thx all for helping me :woot:
I run 3d03 then 3d05 back to back then I run ORthos to determine if stable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pol1977
sparx
I'm not saying that your system is unstable... Just run the two primes to make sure ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brahmzy
haha me too..no more sudden death reboot :D
although i still get post hang whenever I set divider too high..
Orthos pretty much IS 2x prime95's. Prime95 is what it's based onQuote:
Originally Posted by Pol1977
It's just a lot more convenient to use. ;)
No, I say it is unstable when it won't pass the three tests. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Pol1977
sparx
Thanks for thatQuote:
Originally Posted by abaldo
I couldn't agree more... It is very convenient... Only it gave me no errors while my system was unstable and when running two primes gave me errors... I have Orthos Beta 0.93. Is there a newer, more reliable version? Why don't you try running two primes (although unconvenient) to validate your orthos results? Just once ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by infrared