5870 is more like 50% above 4870. 40% above 4890.
http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/h...ting_qualitaet
Printable View
5870 is more like 50% above 4870. 40% above 4890.
http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/h...ting_qualitaet
I also had the HD 4870 X2 and believe me it can hardly be called just a refresh.
Actually it is the first time I hear that the HD 5*** cards are just a refresh of the HD 4*** cards. So I don't get it what is the big smiley for.
EDIT
Sorry I posted before I did noticed your oops edit
35+ pages in review, good lord there's gotta be some juicy stuff in there. CANNOT WAIT!
You know, its not about being a fanboy...but personal preference. One faces many questions...but the answers doesn't have to be rational, although it may seem absurd.
Besides, there are many things numbers doesn't tell us about a product: such as personal experience. NVIDIA is more expensive than ATI at the same performance...but they give you more (cuda, physx, 3d, etc). Is that more worth it? That depends exclusively on you.
What I can tell you is that there are some things that just don't work well with ATI, like 120hz, screen flickering like using dual screens and such things. Yea, its unlikely, but 1+1 = 2...and internet is fully plagued of those errors...and they piss people off, seriously. I can imagine how has one to feel when he buys a 120hz TFT screen not to work on his newly come DX11 card :rofl::rofl::rofl:
Well, basically GTX480 is a doubled GTX285 (I don't know about rops) except the bandwith. 240 vs 480SP and 675 vs 700mhz core.
its hard to say that a 480 is a doubled 285. if you oversimplify to that point there really isnt much difference in any gpu. try comparing g70 to g80 on an alu or flops basis and you will realize that its a pretty abstract number.
It's not just him, we're on page 67 now... people saying page 90 have a low post-per-page count in their user options :p:.
Yup, page 67 now, but it was 66 at the time of your post.
That is a good point, but I have more faith in nVidia to deliver a well-working driver on a new card than I do in ATI from my own experiences, especially considering the 5870 didn't work well for me the 480 sure can't be any worse (I'd hope!) :).
It's already 26.03.2010 here, someone send me a review and i can post it :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
:rofl:
Apparrently Anandtech didn't want to chance maxing out there 850W psu on Fermi :).
http://anandtech.com/casecoolingpsus...oc.aspx?i=3780
I'm waiting for any kind of "leaked benchmark" posts any time now.
dont make any posts in this thread unless it's a full review from now on, you're just going to disappoint me
In quite a few games 5870 is pretty much a double of 4870, so not sure where this 40% nonsense is coming from.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v5...-GPUs-1920.png
still no awesome news?? no leaked actual benches from someone who definately has the card?? the leaked benches we have seen thus far i dont 100% trust
I'm not neon green or otherwise, I have a slight preference toward nV cards because of personal experience... I am not a fanboy who wishes, like many on these boards lately, that one or the other company falls on its face and dies :p:.
I still don't get what's funny about thinking two high-TDP cards might, under high load, overdo it on an 850w power supply with a high-end rig... guess you have to be dark red to get it? Me calling you a fanboy makes about as much sense as you calling me one, so let's go with it ;)!
5970 is a single card with dual-GPU's that are cut back and lowered clocks to fit inside a 300w power envelope. A single Fermi is supposed to be 250w TDP roughly. So again, if you put say two 5970's in a rig and were worried, why would it be "funny" to say "LOL ATI, THEY HAD TO USE A BIGGER PSU FOR TWO 300w CARDS LULZ"? Again, they are talking about TWO high-TDP cards: what on earth can that say that is "funny"? I guess if you were an ATI-fanboy you might think it's funny because it takes a lot of power, I guess?