Originally Posted by
meanmoe
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that neither of you have any formal design/physical engineering experience.
I like Geno also... and in my mind as well, Geno gets an A for effort, but you do not qualify a design based on effort or how much you like a guy.
Testing was mentioned. Testing is part of the design process. You test to (not an all inclusive list)
a) drive down uncertainty during a design process and
b) to verify a design or validate a manufacturing process
in a case of limited testing, standard practice is to over design like hell. In this case, the design was verified by consumers... like me, and it leaked 3 times.
So my conclusion is that:
1) Geno gets and A for effort. He did what he knew. He's a nice guy and I like him.
2) The T3 is an epic failure due to the high failure rate.
3) Due partly to the hype on this forum, I became a sucker and lost money and time.
4) Primochill went above and beyond, but after the fact. (after they took our money)
Nothing personal - believe me I know we live and we learn, but lets be honest about it. Rapt0r, If I was a manufacturer I wouldn't touch the design without factoring in a large effort for re-design (based on the T3 concept).
MT, you got lucky (for now), but not all of the people that you recommended it to were as lucky. No hard feelings -- just victims of poor engineering practice.
Now all that being said, I very much appreciate the fact that someone - Geno in this case - had the balls to go out on their own and push a unique and truly innovative idea to the maketplace - KK, in this we agree very much. I also, in general, appreciate the forum for spotlighting new ideas and new products.
We want to see more innovation like this, but with this hard lesson learned.