Printable View
heheh you BH5 people are killing me heheh
that TREF value there is it 3120 or 0780
also TWTR.....would =1 help with times do you think
what drive/data strength are you using and response time
how do you setup your windows for SPI?...key points i guess
nevermind pm, your too fast.
The above tref is 3120, twtr of 1 does help reduce time, but for me it is difficult at certain levels. My drive/ data is all over, 2/1 5/1 8/2 and frankly can't see much improvement over auto/auto. My Op/sys is stock with sp2 and all drivers I need etc. No tweaks, maxmem or special anything. I tried to do certain things once, all it did was add about a half second and eventually made my mobo fans not work before I got finished messing around. So I just have no antivirus on that comp. and turn off SmartGuardian during run.
OK, I just whipped out some UTT-BH5 so it's time to regain some spots :lol: Aiming for #1 in all categories, except for 19:xx... Not enough steam to compete with Steven :D
i'm lost for words.....i admit i don't have BH5 to play with at the moment but without any tweaks and ram at 250 or so for the 3GHz run you managed to pull of a score like that...........all i have to say is wowQuote:
Originally Posted by coop
lol @ BA......can't wait to see some kick arse runs from you :toast:
can you please give us all a rundown on how you setup and bench when you eventually post your ripper scores :).....i know it's great having high clocking TCCD....probably helps a tonne heheh
I'll use this one for 20.XX, ..for now. **EDIT** if no tweaker is a problem I can use the "32m SPi" in sig.
http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/3048/p10308444kc.jpg
@dinos22, that was a good 3700+ I had at that time. It was fast. I got another one a couple days ago and am learning about it now. They are different from my Opterons. Standings will be updated in a few mins.
nice Opti.....-22C idle at 1.7v+....what sort of cooling is that on and what does it load at
re:3700+, well I did about the same @3Ghz with it. and ^^, it was DI and honestly don't know about temps @ load. No way to tell. If SG gets below 219 it would stop though.
@eva2000, thanks for your update.
so your cold bug kicks in at -36C according to thatQuote:
Originally Posted by coop
Definately, only a couple times did it ever get to 218.
going OT a bit but what sort of results did you get if you tested with air.....i'm just interested to know how it compared to my one
my Opti can go under -40C (SG=215) idle on core....the cooler couldn't go any lower to bug it.....but the previous owner only managed high 3.3GHz for benching ............i guess it may have been limited with HTT and bug donno but we'll see with 11xmulti i have at my disposal....
for now i'll raise the clocks a little to fit under the high 23m unbrealla and lower for 24 minute one.....i had a nice high 22m run with the FF sticks at 3158Mhz but it crapped out on me near the end....and wasn't able to repeat the run....can't get it stable enough with summer temps here...
LOL....you're aware the most all of my times were done without this thread in mind....when I find some time, I'll try to regain some top spots after you take them ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by bachus_anonym
Ok, so let's get the ball rolling again... I have 3 new results ATM:
3510MHz for 20:57.062 .:. 3120MHz for 22:59.812 .:. 2970MHz for 23:57.781
Get clocking mister :p: :D You have a clear shot @ 20:xx due to x13. For same memory clock that you get at x13 (around 270MHz) I would need to drop to x9 and div140. That would require 385+HTT which is not happening at the moment... Anyway, good luck and I'm looking forward to your new results!Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
BA..........give your TCCD sticks a run :toast:
i had to push it to 3125MHz for sub-24 :rolleyes: .........TCCD @275MHz
http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/210...61t28vsupe.jpg
I'm seeing that some of you guys miss the point of this thread. I will add to what s7e9h3n said, to make it more clear:
"The goal is to use the least CPU MHz possible to break into certain time zones. Posting a result, like 20:33 or 20:10 does not make sense at all. One needs to post time from e.g. 20.55.xxx to 20.59.xxx, and certainly not 21:02:xxx ;) The goal is to barely squeeze right below a 21:00 (or 22:00, 23:00, 24:00, etc). As an example, dinoss22's result (post #143) is perfect but Unseen's (post #142) does not fit here at all ;) I say we should be taking under consideration only results within 5s below, e.g. 20:55.000 to 20:59.999..."
And I'll add to this :p: :Quote:
Originally Posted by bachus_anonym
".....unless of course, the speed will still take the top spot in the category :D ......" (I'm just trying to defend my score in the 20:xx category :p: )
EDIT: Although Unseen's run doesn't quite fit, I'd like to say he builds some of the nicest looking phase units around :)
Riiiiiiiiight :lol: :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
Nice bachus, you seem to have things dialed in quite well. The 5 sec guideline is good, but for now with us few playing, we can have 5 or 6 places in each catagory. I did remove a couple in the 23.XX as there was seven with a gap in the speeds at the lower end. Places can be expanded too.
yeap you can get rid of my 24 05 one i guess
suggestion:...........why not link image on front page for the actual OC....easier to follow on from page and more informative :)
I'm keeping your 24.05 for now. It is the only other one. If you like try to do another one, i.e., 24.59 at the slowest speed you can get it done at. It is a good suggestion, I've seen it in other threads. I'm not very adept at things like that. I will see about upgrading.
i will for sure.....that's why i said you can pull it down :DQuote:
Originally Posted by coop
is there an issue with my 23m 58 run...all seems in order to be listed in 23.xx section
ROFL i guess i'll be running this one again.......:rolleyes:
http://img67.imageshack.us/img67/3047/250fk.jpg
this is cruel heheh
http://img61.imageshack.us/img61/5986/259on.jpg