Thanks guys :)
Happy New year :toast:
Copenhagen,
I will check out the 1.65 volts in a bit. I think the 1.85 will do 2800 stable.
OPP
Printable View
Thanks guys :)
Happy New year :toast:
Copenhagen,
I will check out the 1.65 volts in a bit. I think the 1.85 will do 2800 stable.
OPP
At 1.65 Volts the Chip will loop 3D Mark 2001 @ 2600 Mhz. I'll check it and see how high it will do Prime95.
OPP
Truly amazing. How many CPU's did you have to try out, before getting your hands on that one ?Quote:
At 1.65 Volts the Chip will loop 3D Mark 2001 @ 2600 Mhz. I'll check it and see how high it will do Prime95.
/Copenhagen
That chip is really amazing, you got a real good one good jobQuote:
Originally posted by OPPAINTER
At 1.65 Volts the Chip will loop 3D Mark 2001 @ 2600 Mhz. I'll check it and see how high it will do Prime95.
OPP
It was luck of the Draw :D This was the first XP2700 I bought, it was Box by the way.
OPP
Why didnt you publish the 21.7k run? That would put you in second and ruffle JC's feathers.. maybe wake him from his slumber? 8-)
What do ya mean? Do I think the timings are automatically set to a lesser aggressive setting automatically by the 8RDA @ higher FSB's?Quote:
Originally posted by muzz
N8 you seem like a fair guy, and you know a bit........... does it seem that way here though?
Well, I couldn't tell ya to be honest, as I don't own the board nor have I ever played with one. I was just sayin that I wouldn't put it past EPoX, being a 8K3A owner. I see your results & they look fine, I'd be happy with them if I was ya ;)
baller02:
Is that TwinMOS equipped with TwinMOS or Winbond chips?Quote:
with multiplier 10 my 8rda+ scales nicely up to 215 fsb sync dual channel with 2422 timings which is the limit for my twinmos pc3200. on my 8k3a+ this ram also doens't go higher.
What sizes are they, 256 MB DIMMs? (You use 2x right?)
:stick:
Well from my (less informed) point of view, with the bios set to optimal memory timings, as you increase FSB the memory timings do relax. If you set expert mode for memory timings, you can lock the faster timings at whatever FSB. With my pc2100 I must use expert memory timings so that I can run memory synchronously with the 166 FSB. PCI is alwasy locked to 33 Mhz BTW and AGP can be locked to whatever or be left related to the FSB speed.Quote:
Originally posted by N8
What do ya mean? Do I think the timings are automatically set to a lesser aggressive setting automatically by the 8RDA @ higher FSB's?
Well, I couldn't tell ya to be honest, as I don't own the board nor have I ever played with one. I was just sayin that I wouldn't put it past EPoX, being a 8K3A owner. I see your results & they look fine, I'd be happy with them if I was ya ;)
OPP I still wanna know....
Vapokill or prometeia?
BTW my 8RDA+ runs fine at 200mhz plus..
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/mark.fa...t%20ownage.jpg
:D
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm=892664
me 3dmark was done at lower speed, havent had time to update it, been busy with me R/C chopper :D
i think opp was most definatly running prometia..............:banana:
Galifrey,
Yea it was on Prometeia.
Maybe you can tell me, is that a 2700 chip? If so can you use the 13.5 and 14 multiplier with that mobo??
Thanks,
OPP
You can supposedly run 13 and 13.5 but ive not tried it myslef (I dont have a 2700+)
Hi Opp
yeah its a 2700+ and 13.5 and 14 mults work VERY intermittently
I have to mess with it for hours to get them to work, and then randomly on reboot it restarts as an xp1500+ (13x100)
Dont understand why, so have given them up...
Had it boot to windows logon at 15x204 tho :D crashed when the sound played... gah...
Sounds are evil!Quote:
Originally posted by Galifrey
Had it boot to windows logon at 15x204 tho :D crashed when the sound played... gah...
Opp, YGPM
i suggest you take that chip out for a while.. since its such a beauty and keep it stored away, until nvidia releases a gffx.....
Don't let it burn out etc.. (hope i didnt jinx it lol)
I step away from the forums for a little while and when I get back Opp's tearin up the performance world again. WOW!!!!!!!
Tiribulus:toast:
Its simple. Each succeding chip is 66.6666666666666MHz more than the last. the 1600+ ran at 1400. the 1700 ran at 1466.6666666. The 1800 ran at 1533.3333333333. The 1900 ran at 1600. So, take 3100MHz, subtract 2133.3333333333333 and divide by 66.666666666667.Quote:
Originally posted by shray
convert that from mhz to the amd rating scale?
Anybody have that link which converts?
Or set up a proportion...
1800 = ??
------ ----
1533 = 3100
i think .... lol
about 3600+ right??
3100-2133.3333333333333333333 = 966.666666666666666
966.66666666666666666666666666/66.666666666666666666 =
14.5
Add 14.5 to 27 to get 41.5= Athlon XP= 4150, :)
Oh, and to OPP:
:slapass: :smileysex :stick: :toast: :frag: :slash: :thumbsup: :hehe: :rocker: :banana:
OPP:)
On my 8RDA+ 13.5 and 14 DID NOT work...13 did as well as 15. This was a biggie for me as you know..I need 13.5x to achieve my max CPU Mhz and FSB with the chip I've got.
Randi:D
Wrong.Quote:
Originally posted by Penguin4x4
Its simple. Each succeding chip is 66.6666666666666MHz more than the last. the 1600+ ran at 1400. the 1700 ran at 1466.6666666. The 1800 ran at 1533.3333333333. The 1900 ran at 1600. So, take 3100MHz, subtract 2133.3333333333333 and divide by 66.666666666667.
1600+ = 1.40 GHz
1700+ = 1.47 GHz
1800+ = 1.53 GHz
1900+ = 1.60 GHz
2000+ = 1.67 GHz
2100+ = 1.73 GHz
2200+ = 1.80 GHz
So far so good, but as the 66 MHz per 100 rating scales much faster than a P4 does, AMD is risking lying more as they keep ramping up the QS ratings without raising MHz by more than 66 per step, so here comes some adjustments:
2400+ = 2.00 GHz
This one gets 200 rating on 200 MHz!
Now comes the next cut in the line, the 333 MHz FSB:
2600+/333 = 2.08 GHz
That's 83 MHz for 200 rating, eh! The FSB jump increases the QS rating more, though. Here's the two next CPUs:
2700+ = 2.16 GHz
2800+ = 2.23 GHz
That's 83 MHz per 100 QS rating. You can figure out that this might hold for future Tbreds on 333 MHz bus also, but soon you'll see a Barton 512 L2 cache coming... with more cuts in the QS rating scheme.
I heard that the latest (now official) 2C31 BIOS has fixed some of the multipliers issues...Quote:
Originally posted by MrIcee
OPP:)
On my 8RDA+ 13.5 and 14 DID NOT work...13 did as well as 15. This was a biggie for me as you know..I need 13.5x to achieve my max CPU Mhz and FSB with the chip I've got.
Randi:D
--fibo
Well, yeah, its 83 MHz per 100 QS rating when running on the 333MHz DDRFSB, but its still 66 MHz per 100 QS rating when runnin 266MHz DDRFSB, no?:D:D:D:DQuote:
Originally posted by Pjotr
Wrong.
Now comes the next cut in the line, the 333 MHz FSB:
2600+/333 = 2.08 GHz
That's 83 MHz for 200 rating, eh! The FSB jump increases the QS rating more, though. Here's the two next CPUs:
2700+ = 2.16 GHz
2800+ = 2.23 GHz
That's 83 MHz per 100 QS rating. You can figure out that this might hold for future Tbreds on 333 MHz bus also, but soon you'll see a Barton 512 L2 cache coming... with more cuts in the QS rating scheme.
No, the 2400+ is a 266 fsb CPU and is 200 MHz faster than the 2200+
Thanks for this link! I hope it solves the bios temp alarm going off after changing the multiplier from default (*15 xp2400+) to *14 with a FSB increase to 166Mhz. Otherwise it stays off. I also wish the temp cut -off options extended alot lower.Quote:
Originally posted by fibonaccov
I heard that the latest (now official) 2C31 BIOS has fixed some of the multipliers issues...
--fibo
I checked 2C31 bios and it allowed my 2400 with a multi of 13 whereas with previous bioses it wouldn't have worked...fyi.Quote:
Originally posted by megatron
Thanks for this link! I hope it solves the bios temp alarm going off after changing the multiplier from default (*15 xp2400+) to *14 with a FSB increase to 166Mhz. Otherwise it stays off. I also wish the temp cut -off options extended alot lower.
--fibo