But also remember: larger l2 cache cpu's don't oc as high as cpu's with a lower l2 cache ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by brandinb
Printable View
But also remember: larger l2 cache cpu's don't oc as high as cpu's with a lower l2 cache ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by brandinb
Agreed. AMD need to start making the FX a 2MB L2 cache to be a worthwhile gamer CPU. Afterall the X2 now feature 2MB L2 cache in total, so I see no reason why the FX cannot be 2MB.Quote:
Originally Posted by brandinb
They also need to work on the L2 cache latency. A64 L2 cache latency sucks compare to Dothan or pentium 4 with their inclusive cache desighn.
compared to the pentium 4 the fx lvl2 cache sucks?? i totally desagree... even the dothan has only a little lower latency than the fx... the pentium 4 has a much higher latency, that's why it goes for so higher mhz...Quote:
Originally Posted by agenda2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpulloverclock
:oscar: Xcellent work :up:Quote:
4Ghz club
Major congrats on the accomplishment :toast:
Congrats :toast:
Its not easy to bench 57@ 270+ with cascade @ -90C.
Keep it up, 4.1 its almost there :)
it shouldn't anyway, as it's an inverse relationship.. unless we're expecting to add another 4ghz and take a negative amount of time :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
you are right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sesto Sento
"döngü" means "cycle"
"gecikme" means "latency" :rolleyes:
http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b2...-desktop/3.jpg
http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b2...-desktop/4.jpg
NIce job keep working on 4,1Ghz :D
its not much worse then dothan's great cache, and its a bit better then northwood, and its WAY better then prescott.Quote:
Originally Posted by agenda2005