Printable View
oh no need that HTT limit was from -30/-45 so i just want better temps....(lower that is).......i think this chip will manage -45/-50 idle no probs.....we'll see :)Quote:
Originally Posted by moddolicous
i have an IHS BUT i polished it and reduced the thickness a little ;)......
I'd love to see the result of Yonah with both cores running instances of superpi32m
These scores are truly amazing - I am in awe of the power, good job so far :)
I really want to see the scores of boths cores running together.
Mav
blimey they are all so fast , i feel lowly even though i have a nice oc on my p4 2.4c at 3.025ghz at 42m 23.516 :o(
I think when i get some money saved up im gonna upgrade bigstyle lol
Here are my 32m results - completed in June 05:
http://www.extremeprometeia.com/foru...4&d=1145526348
http://www.extremeprometeia.com/foru...4&d=1145526348
@maverik: here my 2 x 32M
Maybe lost a few seconds because of the taskmanager, but only approx 3,5 min behind...;)
I started the 2nd one approx 5 s later then the other.
And I´m shure I lost a lot of seconds because of swaping data to the HD.
@ Stummerwinter
That really is an impressive dual run score - to see it run as sweet as that is nothing short of brilliant- great job and thanks for sharing :)
What sort of temps are you experiencing fully loaded on both cores?
I just can give you temps for r@h, but @ 100 % load...;)
AIR: approx 50°C for both cores - with Zalman 7000B-AlCu
Water: approx 30°C for both cores
Both with AS5
But to be honest, the temps are too low, either in bios, or with this tool posted @ XS.
Right now:
29°C in WXP
33°C measured between cooler and CPU
Those temps are just about right for these cpu's ;) . They output so little heat it's eerie. For example - during a 32m run on my autocascade, temps on the evap temps actually continued to drop from -75C -> -80C :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by stummerwinter
Great score, but its the shared cache thats hurting the time bro. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by stummerwinter
Definately...Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
Actually, that run's a little slow for that speed ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
http://img92.imageshack.us/img92/519...dual32m9zi.jpg
No Steven, I think you've just got a tendency to run fast for your speeds. :p
In all seriousness check out the timings. I was just explaining why his time increased by four seconds with two instances.
Why v1.4 btw? Is 1.5 indeed slower?
That's the only version I had :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
BTW, this was a totally unoptomized run. First try @ dual 32m with the cpu. When I saw the time posted above, I just ran this to see what I'd get :D
Oh yeah - this was on air.....
I just recognized, that the HD is working much more compared to a single run. But you´re right on that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
@s7e9h3n: great times - did´t you start them at the same time?
Which HD do you use? I think, I don´t lose 2 min only by the timings.
This is my FX60 running two instances both started within 1s of each other, clearly with the cold bug I could have a bandwidth issue, no excuses though Yonah pummels the FX60:
http://www.extremeprometeia.com/foru...7&d=1146306445
Your HD should not be working much at all during Spi runs as it's a test of floating point calculations on the cpu. There's very little/no need for the cpu's to access the HD's during the bench.Quote:
Originally Posted by stummerwinter
Thanks.:toast: Yup, they were started within 1 sec. of each other.
I use a 74G Raptor and you're right, you shouldn't be 2 minutes slower ;).....
I use a 74GB Raptor too...:rolleyes:
But especially at the 2 x 32M-run, the HD is working like hell!
At that run I didn´t tweak OS, maybe that´s the reason.
The OS is fresh, no add software (except drivers and AOpen-stuff) installed.
Neither is mine ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by stummerwinter
well, while you guys have been playin with the latest and greatest, i've been playin with my barton, i decided to put my radiator over the a/c vent :D
here's what i could squeeze out
http://x402.putfile.com/4/11818003082-thumb.jpg
my best time ever!! yay
think i could shave 14 minutes off my time with o/s mods? hahahaha
:confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
So, where is my problem?
:(
@dumo: nice results for a Celeron - :woot:
Yonah + AOpen i975Xa-YDG (no mods) + Vapochill LS (stock)
http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/9114/32m33442od.jpg
With 4x512 i get error in loop 18 32M at 3500. This is max so far.
32M
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...4834751MBM.jpg
I'm not sure....is it possible to do a run at the exact same speeds/mem timings as my run so it's easier to compare?Quote:
Originally Posted by stummerwinter
Just hardly trying to get the fastest time for 3000MHz :p:
23m46.500s 3700+@3003MHz / 2*256Mb BH-5@250MHz 1.5-2-2-0
http://img128.imageshack.us/img128/6...g23m46s4up.jpg