Printable View
At what point is this at ? and does this mean evey PCMark05 benchy you see with Asus Boards once the FSB has reached that point and beyond is a lie ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Vapor
Besides that, what scores are you getting in this benchmark ?
Don't know about the multithreaded tests... So why should'nt the Corsair 5400UL's on P5WD2 mobo pawn the 3.1ghz X2 in memory test?Quote:
Originally Posted by Vapor
Don't you know these Ram sticks are the fastest DDR2 in the world (at the moment) :fact:
As a matter of fact, I am saying that scores in nearly any benchmark that has any sort of reliance on memory past a certain point on some Intel ASUS boards ARE a lie. If you had better cooling or pushed a little harder you could get 14k with only a small handful more FSB MHz.Quote:
Originally Posted by IluvIntel
And no matter how good your DDR2 might be, it's on an Intel platform which naturally has MUCH higher latency (due to the mem controller being on the NB and not on-die), which is mainly what the PCMark05 test tests. Your Intel setup is the ONLY one on the entire ORB that beats my X2 or others' FXs in the memory test. Intels simply aren't as good in this test.
And the multithreaded tests have EVERYTHING to do with it....a single core under no condition should beat a decently clocked dual core in those tests--further testament to the fact that your scores are borked (beside the fact that you said you bumped up the FSB a little and your scores went way up). If you want more proof...compare your results to a PD of similar clocks.
I score 7188 on a highly tweaked setup and medium OC'd X2 and GTX (which has nothing to do with what we're talking about, but it is pertinent to the thread)....did you know that your 630 is the single core WR record holder by an overwhelming margin? :rolleyes:
If you would like contine, we should take this to PM.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vapor
I don't think we should continue anything... if you have a problem with Intel setups and benchmarks that measure memory performance then you should direct your comments to the software programmers concerned.
Fair enough....I'll let the PLL bug (this is a known hardware issue dude, I'm not disgruntled because you have a higher score--I applaud high performing systems, but yours isn't TRULY achieving its scores) muss up the ORB this time (I spearheaded a thing awhile back with THE SAME hardware bug that got 14k with a 560 when 200 MHz lower it got ~5.5k). I've reported these posts of ours and will let the mods decide what goes and what stays....I don't want it being a distraction.
Anyway, here's my 7188 again....I'm gonna get a clean benching install with some more registry tweaks in the coming weeks and run the updated version, I'll be aiming for 7250 then as I've got some cooler ambient temps and my CPU and GFX have some new life in them now :banana:
Vapor is right..... that score is borked. Common sense shoud tell you that it's an unrealistic score for a single core cpu. I just got the patch and ran it at 4.3ghz with my 840 dual core and scored 7156 with an x850 card. This is a better score than I got before the patch, but nothing like the gains you got on the 630.
Regardless of who's right and who's wrong. I'm just a user who ran the program with the latest patch and thats the score the program spits out.Quote:
Originally Posted by boshuter
Why don't others who have a problem with this go and ask FUGGER and other top benchers to run the program with the new patch and see what they get...
Let's end the discussion here. I already reported this thread to the mods and they chose to leave it alone but let's not let it get out of hand....IluvIntel, no one is accusing you of cheating, you unfortunately have hardware that bugs out at certain settings. Do some research and you'll see that others have the same problem. It's very unfortunate when hardware doesn't work properly, but that's OCing for ya.
I ran the test a second time and got this:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=140384
If the PLL is so wrong on Asus mobo's then how come it did'nt go out of whack this time? or did it? and this is at 298mhz fsb not 293mhz as before.
Maybe they need to have another patch to work on, just after the last one was recently released.
Another question too, if the PLL is not reliable with PCMark05, then does this theory hold true for ALL of Futuremark benchies with overclocked Asus MoBo's?
Thats about in line with what I get with my 660. I didn't know it was only Asus boards, but i have noticed a lot of times my fsb or cpu speed shows up wrong in PCmark05 and 3Dmark05, haven't really noticed it in the other FM benches. I just attributed it to being oc'd to far. I just got a newer stepping 840 and can't submit any PCmark05 score because PCmark says I have an "unknown cpu" :confused:
Quote:
Originally Posted by boshuter
I have the same problem with 3Dmark05 too, it shows cpu with 15x mult, but I have just run it with 14x. You would think the good people at Futuremark could make the detecting engine more accurate for out mobos.
dayum you guys are killinmg me badly i almost dont wanna post my measily 5000 score, And to think I thought I had a all round fast pc, sure showed me to sit back and shut up.. :(
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1093223
Did a restart and ran everything just as it was without cntrl alt del and got this
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=142878
Decent improvement I guess for not doin a dam thing cept restart
Don't worry Philosophy, a mobo with more voltage options will give that X2 a real breath of life, just keep her cool as you can and you'll be scoring high. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Philosophy
Yeak intel I sure hope I get one soon, it seems that noone ever gets any answers from asrock about a bios release, I went as far as askin Bgtoe aout wha he can acomplish with the bios's we have now and he said hell have a look into it, no responce as of yet.. We still pray :)
First of all, after reading these forums, and being completely fascinated by all this hardware and computer stuff. I went out and bought everything for an extreme system of my own. Put it all together, and now I am hooked. I want to get evrything running sweet, before I start the overclocking stuff. But here are some scores, the only thing I modded was the V. Card timing.
Aquamark3: GFX 13,344 CPU 7,911 Total 72,397 @72.40 FPS
3DMark05: 7,692
Now my next question is, where do I go next to? I am installing a custom water cooling system, adding another video card for SLI, and adding another stick of RAM. Other then that any advise is more then welcomed.
BigEd
AMD 64 X2 3800+ stock
Asus A8N-Deluxe
1GB OCZ Performance Ram
XFX 7800 GT clocked to 486/1.12
2 Samsung Spinpointe 200GB HDD's
heres min with p4 830 duel core http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1205924
could imagane if this board had sli :D
:confused: :confused: :confused:
MAN!!!
:confused: :confused: :confused:
i have a 670 (3.8 G 2mb L2) 2 gb 666mhz ddr2 nforce 4 I.E 2 7800GTX BFG (460core /1300Ram) audigy 4 sound and i cant get more then 9500 on 3dmark 05 no matter what settings i use in nvidea or 3dmark program im using default 1024x768 resolution and 81.xx drivers (non beta) with xp pro SP2 any HELP!!!!! i want to atleast get 10k but so far i cant get close i see ppl on here qith 9k for 1 7800gtx and i got 2 in sli!! :fact:
How do I say this easily.....your score's borked. You also have the PLL bug. Your real score is thousands LOWER. Don't try to argue it, it's useless to argue--this is a PROVEN hardware bug. Sorry.
i think its more likely your mb? or that way yoiu ste it up
its because i have the intel edition huh? even at 3.8 the c19 blowz, i cant even oc the thing even with my 500watt pelt it would scopre higher if i had the amd with a fx even though its 1.2 ghz slower
?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????
I'm sorry....I misread your post....you're getting 9500 in 3DMark05? At 460/1300? Something's wrong....anyway, this is not the right thread, this is for PCMark05
LOL!!! sorry USER ERROR:
I can only tell you from experience. When I changed over to the 81.85( i think it is, its the newest version beta) I saw the biggest diffenerence. But I am not sure what changed between the versions, except for dual core. But I got a 40% increase with this driver. All I can say is try it.
40% increase? In PCMark05?