awesome job dude! :slobber: you'dve thought he'd have started a thread here or something..... there's always room for suspicion until proven otherwise. :stick:
Printable View
awesome job dude! :slobber: you'dve thought he'd have started a thread here or something..... there's always room for suspicion until proven otherwise. :stick:
This is good for the WR?
3700+ San Diego: Sucka - 3513.32
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=19513
http://suckasd.com/computer/sandiego/sandiego.jpg
nice chip there sucka! :up:
Thank you. I haven't been able to find one higher, so i guess for the time being i can claim the WR :)Quote:
Originally Posted by 5-Clicks
3500+ (ClawHammer) petervandamned - 3523.75 MHz http://<br /> http://valid.x86-secr...id=18978<br />
This is a score from a clawhammer 4000+ not a 3500+
I second that :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Sesto Sento
Nice one :) could you share the steppings and batch number please?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sucka
cooled with the Mach II?
:slobber:Quote:
Originally Posted by Waus-mod
CABGE 0515SPMW (Monarch)Quote:
Originally Posted by petervandamned
Mach II cooled.
If no one is going to claim the 3500+ Venice, i will.
3500+ Venice: Sucka - 3463.25
CBBLE 0512DPAW Mach II unmodded.
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=16680
http://xtremesystems.org/forums/atta...id=31208&stc=1
Please post after this Name - Clock valid-image-link and it will be 100 times easier for me.
And please give me the nickname of the Venice 4ghz guy please.
It sounds pretty awesome... Noname @ 400MHz 1:1 and noone knows him.. Perhaps this verification system is not 100% bug-free or he has struck gold with those noname RAM :)
Dothan: Kaz - 3800 MHz http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&page=10&pp=25
Looks Like I just beat My Cpu speed record for a P4 630 and also the DDR2 bandwidth record :woot:
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=20405
Does anyone know what the WR pifast at watercooling is?
I got 39.44secs.
Is it a bug since you can't see the ratio or the frequency?Quote:
Originally Posted by hag6br
Yes.. Cpu-Z 1.28.7 is supposed to fix it (the stilt has it) But it has not yet been released to the public yet :(Quote:
Originally Posted by NiCKE^
BTW: it is at 1:1 ratio..
:confused: i cant find it ,just found 1.28.6Quote:
Originally Posted by hag6br
Cpu-Z 1.28.7 appears to still be in Beta.. rumors have it also fixes the Venice and SD cores not reading correctly..Quote:
Originally Posted by overcrash86
Mind to re-do it and post it again with one which we can see the frequency at?
No problem :DQuote:
Originally Posted by NiCKE^
Perfect, give me a pm when it's done please.
I would really like to see your bandwidth effiency percent.Quote:
Originally Posted by hag6br
341FSB with 4-3-3-10 settings doesn´t give you anywhere near 9k in Sandra buffered. Lowish 8k would sound correct.
Sandra reports Max Bandwidth of 10,912 at those settings.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Stilt
But, I am only hitting 9K because of the higher cpu speed and a tweaked copy of Win2003 server.
I think yours would be hitting 10K with the same cpu speed and OS.. :cool:
I also Saw a HUGE bandwidth jump when I set the Tras to 10..
IIRC cpu speed doesn´t affect memory bandwidth on Intel, because the memory controller is on motherboard instead of cpu...Quote:
Originally Posted by hag6br