300mhz 2-2-2 memtest screenie looks to me like 300HTT with 180 divider or non-standard DFI dividers which will show up as 300mhz 2-2-2 due to a bug as 3199MB/s is very low more like 270mhz 2-2-2- realQuote:
Originally Posted by johnnyliu3377
Printable View
300mhz 2-2-2 memtest screenie looks to me like 300HTT with 180 divider or non-standard DFI dividers which will show up as 300mhz 2-2-2 due to a bug as 3199MB/s is very low more like 270mhz 2-2-2- realQuote:
Originally Posted by johnnyliu3377
I get 3199MB with TCCD @300Mhz 2.5-3-3-2 very tight timings @2.7Ghz so . . . yes it's lowQuote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
Low indeed.. I'm getting over 3200MB/s at 246FSB (11x246) :P
now that's what i call a screen :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by macci
yea, wanna try playin CSS on it :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
*Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
In fact.
:confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Punisher!
- You are right.Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
- It is true...
- Yeah.
- :approved:.
- It must be like that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyliu3377
THIS IS BUG !
His mem is set to 9/10 (180 in BIOS).
Memory runs at CPU/10 but memtest does'nt read the settings for some of memory option right. IIRC 140 also shows 300mhz :stick:
I copied the setup with my NF4 setup & Corsair BH5.
http://www.ricco.karoo.net/images/mem/bh5_300.jpg
Memory is actualy 270mhz :stick:
EDIT*
Reason for bandwidth difference is that I'm running 4x256 at 270mhz so have to use 2T
YA~~~ you'r right this is memtest+ 1.51 "BUG"Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
i like you man~ :toast:
Those "tests" can be sent to where nobody wants to be.
Still waiting for proper stuff from OPB :) - atleast something that might not show the most awsome results, which it probably will, but something tested thoroughly and responsibly.
Renegade product-launchers :slap:
I ve got a question why were u postin a bugged result if u knew it's bugged?Quote:
Originally Posted by qk4723Deluxe
--- $0m#0n# ---
That isn't qk4723's screenie... it's johnnyliu3377's (although unfortunately QK added it at the end of his real results)...
--- stryg ---
Curious as to how you see the below tests (given Pi1M is used) put up by QK as useless??
Regarding "renegade" advance info... I guess you think this info by s7e9h3n and the corresponding thread with advance tests by PcIce and Opp the same way, since they aren't by AMD? :confused:
--- macci ---
Love your "screen" bro ;)
Peace
Quote:
Originally Posted by qk4723Deluxe
very nice clocks.
exactly... i wanna know too.. what were you tryin' to do huhQuote:
Originally Posted by $0m#0n#
Quote:
Originally Posted by earthman
why memtest didnt start at ddr600 with the bug if the ram was 270???
*cough*some one should stop faking results... */cough*
EMC2.
If a AMD rep hung out inhere, periodically giving us previews and introductions to new AMD products, helping out peeps settings up their newly purchase AMD product to its maximum performance and generally contributing to the community in a loving way, I would most definately find the Venice preview and posts like it to be the area of someone else...
Get the point? :)
Besides, anyone posting a bugged mem86 pic (DDR600 2-2-2-5!!!), intentionally trying to give the impression that its valid - he even admits its not even doable, thus disqualifying the importence of the pic...
Well, I just dont care much about anything else he would post. Sorry :shrug:
Quote:
Originally Posted by stryg
I thought johnnyliu3377 wants to express is he discovers BUG and to be glad the share to attempt to everybody.
He on the other hand is wants to test QK whether detected has this question to have any trade mark memory body to be able to appear such mistake!
Even if johnnyliu3377 has not used G-Skill also to have the same problem therefore..
OPB correctly pointed out by no means a question institute instead is appearing the divergence the discussion to make one feel the regret :(
Quote:
Originally Posted by OPB
I dont understand your english. Sorry :)Quote:
Originally Posted by qk4723Deluxe
Quote:
Originally Posted by stryg
Chinese English http://www.gamemad.com/image/smile/i...le_approve.gif
Hehe nice.Quote:
Originally Posted by qk4723Deluxe
I must go to China :p:
Go to TAIWAN i act dragoman :)Quote:
Originally Posted by stryg
holy mama....that's cool ! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
--- Stryg ---
I think I understand your view now, sincere thanks :toast: I can see your point in the first part, don't necessarily agree completely, but it's cool :)
----
Regarding the 2nd part... that was Johnnliu3377's screen... QK posted valid results... but unfortunately a side item got thrown in the mix it appears :( In looking back over the thread, and QK4723's comments just above, I think what may have happened is this :
QK4723 posted some results on GSkill... johnnyliu posted a memtest screen of a different vendor's DIMMs with BH5 (and noted it didn't work at the bottom of the post, but unfortunately didn't identify it wasn't GSkill in that post, which led to some of the confusion... although in post #68 $0m#0n# identified it wasn't Gskill). Then johnnyliu posted a screen with the 250Mhz that worked... think he was attempting to raise the issue of the memtest problem, and was wondering if QK4723 saw the same bug with memtest and the GSkill memory. Then QK4723 posted valid results with benches, etc.... and added a pic showing the bug in memtest showed up for him as well (but didn't identify that for others). Then OPB brought to johnyliu's attention that this was a discussion about GSkill BH-5 and that his interjection into the discussion of the memtest bug got things out of sorts and wasn't appropriate.
Then again I could be completely wrong, like I said, I don't speak Chinese :p:
Peace bro :toast: