Amd Fsb Ranking

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

03-20-2004, 10:29 AM
tictac

Quote:

Originally posted by TheDogFather
247 DC

Mushkin Black Lvl2 PC3500
DFI Infinity.

I'll try and improve on it once you decide what the bench is going to be.

TDF.

:thumbsup:
03-20-2004, 10:33 AM
muzz

I just dld pcmark 04, and it states whatever it is set to in the bios(details/cpu details), no matter what I set clockgen to.
So that is useless.

I guess a sandra mem bench would have to do, making sure it IS SHOWING the FSB speed in the screenie.
03-20-2004, 10:56 AM
Malves

Well, i think this became really dumb now. Only a CPUZ screenie was fine.
Tell ya what, if you think getting a CPUZ screenie at 290FSB is easy...you'd better think again!
If you wanna a screen with a bench, then it should be Pifast or Superpi. Easy, fast and i bet you'll get more people willing to participate on this rank. Just my cr@p opinion.
03-20-2004, 11:10 AM
tictac

Valid Compare Link: 3D Mark 2001 / 3D Mark 2003

Shroomalistic
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1773773

Dani
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1814560

:toast:
03-20-2004, 11:27 AM
muzz

Quote:

Originally posted by Malves
Well, i think this became really dumb now. Only a CPUZ screenie was fine.
Tell ya what, if you think getting a CPUZ screenie at 290FSB is easy...you'd better think again!
If you wanna a screen with a bench, then it should be Pifast or Superpi. Easy, fast and i bet you'll get more people willing to participate on this rank. Just my cr@p opinion.

First of all I NEVER stated that 290 was ez, of course it's not, I wasn't born yesterday.
I am just contributing to the thread where some folks were discussing ALTERNATIVE methods besides cpu-z, some folks wanted to see if it was actually SOMEWHAT stable., thats why it has been brought up.

Neither Pifast or SuperPi show anything regarding FSB, so I have no idea where they came from with regard to FSB ranking.

Of course there could be a cpu-Z ( for fastest screenie) and another bench showing fastest benchable fsb ( not overall speed- FSB max).
It has been brought up that if it doesn't actually state IN THE SCREENIE what fsb it is then it may be BS...
Look back a couple posts ago from the thread starter himself.

I don't see it as Stupid, just another way of comparing things.
TBO I really don't care.
03-20-2004, 11:27 AM
bachus_anonym

i was waiting for this...

Quote:

Originally posted by Cucumber
I really think there should have to be a set benchmark everyone has to run to qualify.

i.e. 3dmark compare URL,

....these speed screenshots before the system crashes are pointless imo(even mine is completely unstable at 260)

....can we have a 3dmark stable, ranking. I think that is a much better idea.

Quote:

Originally posted by tictac
:thumbsup:

Ranking Reset to 0

to put name in ranking as cucumber said

Compare link for 3D mark 2001 or 3D Mark 2003 score.... :thumbsup:

it would be absolutely great idea to make this ranking "Maximum All-Stable FSB"...
and what is the problem with clockgen or nf7svcore or such? if one can't boot to Windows with, say 250FSB set in BIOS and run 3Dmark2001 or PCMark04, then one doesn't make to this ranking.

Quote:

Originally posted by Malves
Well, i think this became really dumb now. Only a CPUZ screenie was fine.
Tell ya what, if you think getting a CPUZ screenie at 290FSB is easy...you'd better think again!
If you wanna a screen with a bench, then it should be Pifast or Superpi. Easy, fast and i bet you'll get more people willing to participate on this rank. Just my cr@p opinion.

not good enough... ATM i'm still playing with my system and can do PIFast and SuperPI at 24ish with no "errors in computation"... not stable enough for 3DMark01 and PCmark02 whatsoever though :(

Quote:

Originally posted by tictac
250MHz = ABIT NF7S Rev2.0 by Cucumber (Twinmos-43B)

this ranking could even get more complicated... nothing against this link but such a record would be not absolutely perfect either... some memories can't get much get higher with relaxed timings. so it could be not fair to those that can do say 240FSB 11-2-2 cas2 (and get better performace) but 250FSB 11-3-3 cas2.5 would be still on top...

i have perfect idea... one posts result with screenie of 3Dmark01 after it finishes (with the score) with CPU-Z with Memory Tab right next to it and link to ORB below... as far as i noticed even if u change timings in clockgen or nf7svcore they don't change at all... EDIT: i was wrong on that one, it changes but CPU-z needs to be restarted to show it changed... crap... at least cas can't be changed

sorry for "crapping" on your thread, tictac ;)
03-20-2004, 02:35 PM
Lastviking

Tictac before you make anymore changes....or before i do i new post.

Make this post like this..

Dualchannel(1/1):

-----Max Cpu-z-----------

http://upl.silentwhisper.net/uplfold...dc291.1fsb.jpg
-----Max Sisoftsandra---

http://upl.silentwhisper.net/uplfold...ft283.64dc.jpg

-----Max 3Dmark200X---

http://upl.silentwhisper.net/uplfold...3fsb3dmark.jpg

Singelchannel(1/1)

-----Max Cpu-z-----------

-----Max Sisoftsandra---

-----Max 3Dmark200X---
03-20-2004, 02:42 PM
quicksilver98

I second that!!
03-20-2004, 02:51 PM
bachus_anonym

right on...
i will post "all-stability score screenie" later on... i have it almost ready...
gotta go to work now...

EDIT: scores update:

All Dual Channel CPU Enabled

Max CPU-Z and Sandra - 250FSB

Proof of rock_stability ;)

Max All-Stable Sandra - 236FSB
Max 3DMark2001 - 236FSB ---> http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7679023
Max PCMark02 - 236FSB ---> http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm=1741286
Max PCMark04 - 236FSB ---> http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=271137
Max SuperPI - 236FSB
Max PIFast - 236FSB

VOILA :D
03-21-2004, 08:39 AM
Stang_Man

well, i'll contribute one more time to this thread, validating some stuff:

max CPU-Z:

http://marcin.fastlanehw.com/nf7_250fsb.gif

max Sandra2004:

http://marcin.fastlanehw.com/sandra_nf7_249fsb.gif

max 3dmark2001:

245FSB - 23384

ALL SINGLE CHANNEL
03-21-2004, 10:08 AM
yuri

here is my fastest 1:1 singal ch 2x256 hyperX 3200

http://webpages.charter.net/jumper75/45.08.JPG
03-21-2004, 10:49 AM
Cucumber

This is AthlonXP only mate :)
03-21-2004, 11:09 AM
yuri

Quote:

Originally posted by Cucumber
This is AthlonXP only mate :)

:eek: :slobber: :eek:

:toast:
03-21-2004, 03:55 PM
Lasac

Quote:

Originally posted by oc_nightmare
nice to see the "tugas" on top here in xtremesys:D nice fsb :slobber:
bom trabalho Lasac:banana:
hehehehe:p:

Quote:

Originally posted by ojdr2001
TUGA Power:banana: :banana: :banana:

Congrats Lasac

Tnks buddies! :toast:

Maybe next time I'll try for DC category... numa proxima oportunidade de ter aki a makina! :D

ojdr: congrats for 1st place in 9600 series (aka 9600XT) in 3Dmark2001! :toast:

Mete lá o brinkedo novo k passas os 20k :D

Lastviking: you have one monster lanparty :D

I can't imagine that baby at 5:4 with one program that give you more than 300fsb... :slobber:

Cumps Lasac
03-22-2004, 05:16 AM
Nikita

Dual Channel
NF7-S v2.0
PC3200 Kingston ValueRam BH-5

http://www.hpautoelectrics.com/OverC...0%20pifast.jpg
03-24-2004, 10:55 AM
bachus_anonym

what's up with this thread...? is it dead already ?

why there' neither more results nor any updates :(
03-28-2004, 10:07 AM
Cap_Hook

Max 250 FSB 3DMark2001 Dual Channel.
03-28-2004, 10:27 AM
Evil_Spork

well no one has a 3dmark run that SHOWS high fsb i always use clockgen for my benchmark runs.. so all my 3dmarks show 200fsb.... not the real 258..:(
03-28-2004, 10:37 AM
bachus_anonym

why don't you then set 258FSB in BIOS, boot to Windows and run 3dmark2001 then... it will show pretty much correct FSB then; shouldn't be more than +/- 1mhz off...
03-28-2004, 01:33 PM
SAE

Quote:

Originally posted by bachus_anonym
why don't you then set 258FSB in BIOS, boot to Windows and run 3dmark2001 then... it will show pretty much correct FSB then; shouldn't be more than +/- 1mhz off...

Erm.. it's working up to 257 iirc. Then it' showing from 1MHz on upwards... 260 is 4MHz in my case... see my 3dm compare ;)
03-28-2004, 02:16 PM
bachus_anonym

hehe, that's weird... oh well, let it be that way, then :)
03-28-2004, 03:09 PM
SAE

Quote:

Originally posted by bachus_anonym
hehe, that's weird... oh well, let it be that way, then :)

Yeah. :D

How the hell did Lastviking reach these insane fsb of 11MHz? :D LOL

His one 3dmark link showed that ;) 272MHz iirc.
03-28-2004, 03:18 PM
Evil_Spork

i cant seem to boot with FSB that high, but i can use clockgen to get there and bench.

sometimes i can even stay at those levers for hours at a time, but booting at them results in a lockup or cold boot problem(no post)
03-28-2004, 09:18 PM
CarpeDiem

I run my infinity 250x10, prime stable, and the highest I can go is 253 fsb prime/memtest stable, anymore and I get freezing in memtest86 for some reason? I tried increasing vcore but wouldn't do anything. I dont use clockgen.
03-29-2004, 12:39 PM
SAE

Quote:

Originally posted by Evil_Spork
i cant seem to boot with FSB that high, but i can use clockgen to get there and bench.

sometimes i can even stay at those levers for hours at a time, but booting at them results in a lockup or cold boot problem(no post)

I could boot with 261x11 into windows when my prom was alive :(

It's got a leak on the head... trying to get it repaired by nventive... hope they can help me out. Dealer said I 've to contact nventive for rma issues :mad:

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page