Gskill TridentX F3-2800C11Q-16GTXD

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

09-18-2012, 10:36 PM
Zeus

Thanks guys, i have to say i was really surprised.

I have absolutely no clue why the red slots are so much better. The black slots hardly got over 2600.

Albrecht, i know Samsung can be pretty vulnerable, i remember this from the old TCCD days. So i'm a bit reluctant to try high volts even though i know some have already pushed 2V into sammies.

Sergio, this was LB 6 iirc, haven't messed with third timings yet as the screen i posted was the very first try for 32M at 2800.
09-18-2012, 11:25 PM
Don_Dan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reefa_Madness

Clearly, based on post #120 above, at least some versions of "AB40" are Hynix, as are some of the 3-row versions of the "GSKGSKGSK". I'm beginning to think that GSkill is just having fun with us and is mixing them all up in order to confuse us...

I'm afraid you're right... :rofl:

Quote:

Along the lines of GSkill trying to confuse us...I've also recently gotten some GSkill (Sniper DDR3-1866 9-10-9-28 @ 1.50v) with the "2100" numbering in the 5th-8th spot, so I guess that's one more to add to the list of unknowns. I can't match up the edges of the ICs to anything that has been posted so far. Once I test them perhaps I'll have some idea, based on their behavior.

I haven't seen this number yet, but 1866 9-10-9 @ 1.5V could be Micron D9PFJ.
09-19-2012, 06:29 AM
Zeus

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reefa_Madness

Clearly, based on post #120 above, at least some versions of "AB40" are Hynix, as are some of the 3-row versions of the "GSKGSKGSK". I'm beginning to think that GSkill is just having fun with us and is mixing them all up in order to confuse us...

Along the lines of GSkill trying to confuse us...I've also recently gotten some GSkill (Sniper DDR3-1866 9-10-9-28 @ 1.50v) with the "2100" numbering in the 5th-8th spot, so I guess that's one more to add to the list of unknowns. I can't match up the edges of the ICs to anything that has been posted so far. Once I test them perhaps I'll have some idea, based on their behavior.

You're confused? Here's more confusion:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...ps1fac7758.jpg

It's probably some sort of Samsung C-die chip:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...ps5f080ea8.jpg

Stops scaling after 2200 C9.
09-19-2012, 06:32 AM
Reefa_Madness

Quote:

Originally Posted by Don_Dan

I haven't seen this number yet, but 1866 9-10-9 @ 1.5V could be Micron D9PFJ.

It sure seemed like maybe you had pegged it, so I pulled out some OEM-type Crucial sticks that I have with D9PFJ and the edges of the chips don't match up at all with the GSkill "2100", therefore I think that we can rule those out.
09-19-2012, 06:55 AM
Reefa_Madness

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeus

You're confused? Here's more confusion

More confusion...like I really need that. :)

So now we have 2150 to add to the list. Who is the Master List Keeper? Gonna be a full-time job soon at the rate GSkills keeps pumping out numbering schemes.
09-19-2012, 03:27 PM
AVulgarPicture

im glad someones keeping track, cuz yeh that is getting pretty confusing.

you can read between the lines on a lot of stuff, but yeh.
09-19-2012, 06:09 PM
Shiranui Gen-An

Question for those with experience clocking these 2800 sticks, did you have to do any advanced tuning in the Maximus V family BIOS settings at all (Swizzle, Latency Boundary, etc)?
09-19-2012, 06:45 PM
Dumo

With cpu capable to go 2850ish imc, it can do 2840+ xmp 2T @ 1.65V

http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/3185/44470134.png

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post5097681
09-19-2012, 06:49 PM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shiranui Gen-An

Question for those with experience clocking these 2800 sticks, did you have to do any advanced tuning in the Maximus V family BIOS settings at all (Swizzle, Latency Boundary, etc)?

not at all Shiranu with good IMC you do what u want
09-19-2012, 06:58 PM
Shiranui Gen-An

My CPU's IMC is certainly capable (no code 23) but it seems the DIMMs need some fine tuning, lots of code 55. Sometimes I'll even get to boot and bench but next boot with the same settings, Code 55. *shrugs*
09-19-2012, 07:16 PM
l0ud_sil3nc3

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shiranui Gen-An

My CPU's IMC is certainly capable (no code 23) but it seems the DIMMs need some fine tuning, lots of code 55. Sometimes I'll even get to boot and bench but next boot with the same settings, Code 55. *shrugs*

Vaseline as insulation?
09-19-2012, 07:21 PM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shiranui Gen-An

My CPU's IMC is certainly capable (no code 23) but it seems the DIMMs need some fine tuning, lots of code 55. Sometimes I'll even get to boot and bench but next boot with the same settings, Code 55. *shrugs*

that happened to me Shiranu and i screwed timmings too tight once then i flashed back and fourth BIOS and same, so i started from scratch from 2600CL10 latency boundary 12 let it go...then i put 2800 again and all fine never happened again

my codes where 23 / 20 / 55 thanks god this i received only phew times this one

read here
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...Q-16GTXD/page5

good luck hope it helps
Sergio
09-20-2012, 02:51 PM
owikh84

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shiranui Gen-An

Question for those with experience clocking these 2800 sticks, did you have to do any advanced tuning in the Maximus V family BIOS settings at all (Swizzle, Latency Boundary, etc)?

a 2800 capable chip doesn't need sub-timing tuning at all.
just set 2800 strap, main timing 11-13-13 & proper vdimm, vccsa, vccio that's all.
09-20-2012, 04:03 PM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by owikh84

a 2800 capable chip doesn't need sub-timing tuning at all.
just set 2800 strap, main timing 11-13-13 & proper vdimm, vccsa, vccio that's all.

why not ? u can tight and gain better perfomance owi...

this is lat boundary 6

http://i.imgur.com/uBKMr.jpg

no need to tweak VCCSA or VCCIO
09-20-2012, 09:41 PM
owikh84

@ sergio, I was refering to the first boot up with 2800 without optimising
Because he asked whether the needs to tweak to make the chip posted at 2800.
09-21-2012, 05:46 AM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by owikh84

@ sergio, I was refering to the first boot up with 2800 without optimising
Because he asked whether the needs to tweak to make the chip posted at 2800.

ahhh sorry
09-21-2012, 05:52 AM
Zeus

Any pointers on how to stabilize this for 32M anyone?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...ps19e4d89a.png
09-21-2012, 05:56 AM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeus

Any pointers on how to stabilize this for 32M anyone?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...ps19e4d89a.png

i guess vdimm, and 4-4-4-4-22-22 on the trasmiter slews

but maybe Dumo can help better i dont want to punish the memory with volts are very expensive

good luck
Sergio
09-21-2012, 07:55 AM
l0ud_sil3nc3

^as sergio said, MOAR volts!
09-21-2012, 10:22 AM
Zeus

I guess you guys are right. This was already 1.79V, i don't want to kill those sticks even though i know they scale pretty well with volts. Maybe 2933 is asked a bit too much for Samsung? Most 2800+ overclocks we see are with Hynix, not with Samsung i think.

Lemme try to get 32M done at 1400 C10 first. 1.77V didn't seem to cut it.
09-21-2012, 10:29 AM
C-N

My Samsungs 32m 2933 but need 1.84v for 11.13.13
09-21-2012, 10:54 AM
Zeus

Your old "2V kit" or your new 2666 kit? 1.84V is still a bit much for a :banana::banana::banana::banana::banana: like me. Gotta try C-N tactics and hit a few beers first. :D
09-21-2012, 11:29 AM
C-N

Ha ha the 2666 kit & ye the beers work real good
09-21-2012, 02:21 PM
l0ud_sil3nc3

^2v club ftw!
09-21-2012, 02:45 PM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeus

Your old "2V kit" or your new 2666 kit? 1.84V is still a bit much for a :banana::banana::banana::banana::banana: like me. Gotta try C-N tactics and hit a few beers first. :D

:rofl:

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page