When will people stop posting Coolaler's crap? He's been banned for years now...
Printable View
When will people stop posting Coolaler's crap? He's been banned for years now...
Daddy likes cooler temps and higher clocks.
According to this link, the 77 W 3500's does have Hyperthreading.
Is it a typo or what?
Edit:
Attachment 124111
Would be a pleasant surprise, but I vote for typo.
Well now I had another look at it, both sheets says "Low power", and part of the text at the bottom is covered by the list.
I vote for fake.
BTW a short swedish article since the thread got bumped may as well post it: http://translate.google.com/translat...en-gud&act=url
Appearently 5GHz pn air will be easy. I still hope it'll be more like at least 5.2GHz is still quite easy to achieve and if pushing it with a good sample you might get to 5.5GHz or so. But also interesting is the "goes nearly 1GHz higher than 2600K on LN2" part. ^^ Say 6.7~7GHz Ivy would probably perform quite nicely.
Specs for i3 ivy bridge processors models leaked
http://www.techpowerup.com/160553/Iv...-Gen.-3.0.html
Core i3-3220T 2.8GHz 35w TDP
Core i3-3240T 3GHz 35w TDP
Core i3-3220 3.3GHz 55w TDP
Core i3-3225 3.3GHz 55w TDP (comes with faster HD4000 graphics)
Core i3-3240 3.4GHz 55w TDP
How do we know those Ivy-E pics are fake? No saying you're wrong or they're not, just how do you know? is there an obvious flaw in the images?
I for one was excited to see Ivy-E something..Because it's yet to show up on any official or leaked roadmap. Even the most recent Intel roadmap had SB-E out till Haswell.
Also whatever happened to the SB-E respin, with all the borked features returning like SAS and the dedicated storage PCi-E links? Will they ever drop a fully functional SB-E chipw with all 8 cores active on the desktop? I can't wait till Ivy-E (if it exists) for that..:(
Hmm interesting... if this numbers hold up till launch the are in the range of a HD5550
The numbers look really good for them, not that I am interested in IGP.
It could still improve with the launch drivers, and why would EXPreview have the latest and greatest drivers.
4.6GHz - 1.1V
http://tof.canardpc.com/preview/2a11...f065f0ed27.jpg http://tof.canardpc.com/preview/d7c6...88d40e7809.jpg http://tof.canardpc.com/preview/08b4...9c07c22243.jpg http://tof.canardpc.com/preview/6446...3057b36fb5.jpg http://tof.canardpc.com/preview/de55...937c92b82f.jpg http://tof.canardpc.com/preview/1a7f...408dac1add.jpg http://tof.canardpc.com/preview/0e2f...b612f41b8a.jpg http://tof.canardpc.com/preview/4e2e...64556cd2b7.jpg
http://tof.canardpc.com/preview2/cd3...c5d138f2b4.jpg
5GHz - 1.27V
http://tof.canardpc.com/preview2/bb7...4496c20213.jpg
http://news.mydrivers.com/1/218/218240.htm
Still no info on 23.976 fps problem.. :(
Olivon must agree some impressive scores there and is just me or have the temps dropped a bit as well by the looks of things (depending was this on water or just air) 5Ghz 1.27v really it's surprised me quite a bit.:up: Cinebench was quite impressive as well. Can't wait to have a play my self lol
5ghz @ 1.27v is crazy!
curious to see if extensive binning is going to be required to find a good one like sb.
looks very good...!
seems to be worth waiting !
what about paper launch rumors ? second rumor says it wwould only affect laptop cpus
Actually I think 5GHz 1.27v is so-so compared to 4.6GHz at 1.1v, big vcore increase there. Then some person on chiphell was earlier speaking of like 1.17v 5GHz, maybe we're looking at Ivy to OC 5GHz @ ~1.2~1.23v or so in avg would be nice, ofc still need way more results to know exactly what the avg looks to be for 5GHz.
yes h2 what? the sb-e respin will be out in the 2nd half of this year?
Looking good so far.