OCZ 8500 Low-Voltage Blade

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

05-23-2009, 04:56 PM
-n7-

Quote:

Originally Posted by zsamz_

you wrong there your gskills are powerchips they scale 2.1v max and they dont get hot

G.Skill Pi 2x2 GB DDR2-1100 aren't PSC.

They are ProMOS (obviously much lower binned than the 1200s)

See here for IC pics: http://www.overclock.net/5156614-post34.html
05-23-2009, 06:24 PM
zsamz_

Quote:

Originally Posted by -n7-

G.Skill Pi 2x2 GB DDR2-1100 aren't PSC.

They are ProMOS (obviously much lower binned than the 1200s)

See here for IC pics: http://www.overclock.net/5156614-post34.html

tks
i wish i knew before had a chance to get a few sets cheap:(
05-24-2009, 12:49 AM
Zeus

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acoma_Andy

I have the G-Skill PI 8800's and I can confirm they are absolutely not the same. My max clock with them at performance level 8 was 1130mhz (1170mhz with PL9), and the OCZ Blades do 1261mhz with that. Massive difference.

PL has nothing to do with the ram, it's a Northbridge latency setting. ;)
05-24-2009, 12:51 AM
kagula323

I see there is quite a lot of you that got this ram. Enought with talking ... just post more result :D. Primarly I wanna know how much mch voltage they need for working @ high frequency in combination with high FSB and mainly on EP45-UD3P motherboard ... because I own one .... please post some results on my request :)

Have u attained `1200MHZ and more with FSB of 500? and higher?
05-24-2009, 02:24 AM
billdavis

Quote:

Originally Posted by zsamz_

you wrong there your gskills are powerchips they scale 2.1v max and they dont get hot

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acoma_Andy

I have the G-Skill PI 8800's and I can confirm they are absolutely not the same. My max clock with them at performance level 8 was 1130mhz (1170mhz with PL9), and the OCZ Blades do 1261mhz with that. Massive difference.

Quote:

Originally Posted by -n7-

G.Skill Pi 2x2 GB DDR2-1100 aren't PSC.

They are ProMOS (obviously much lower binned than the 1200s)

See here for IC pics: http://www.overclock.net/5156614-post34.html

OK OK i got it there not the same
05-24-2009, 07:39 AM
xzulu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acoma_Andy

I have the G-Skill PI 8800's and I can confirm they are absolutely not the same. My max clock with them at performance level 8 was 1130mhz (1170mhz with PL9), and the OCZ Blades do 1261mhz with that. Massive difference.

Acoma, thanks for sharing that! Lets see what i can do with my kit:up:
05-24-2009, 08:00 AM
Acoma_Andy

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeus

PL has nothing to do with the ram, it's a Northbridge latency setting. ;)

I know. Just wanted to point out the maximum overclock with each set.
05-24-2009, 08:16 AM
xzulu

Damn. I just read the whole thread for the 2nd time! LOL! Makes me want to get a kit of this!!!
05-24-2009, 11:11 AM
Don_Dan

Quote:

Originally Posted by kagula323

I see there is quite a lot of you that got this ram. Enought with talking ... just post more result :D. Primarly I wanna know how much mch voltage they need for working @ high frequency in combination with high FSB and mainly on EP45-UD3P motherboard ... because I own one .... please post some results on my request :)

Have u attained `1200MHZ and more with FSB of 500? and higher?

I'm running MCH at 1.24V, but 533MHz CL5 @ 1.65V was done with 1.20V, so that may be enough too. I just don't want to be limited by my NB.

I haven't done any high FSB testing yet, sorry.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeepBeep2

Yeah but anything past 1.9v won't gain you any performance, just heat. At least I think it's the conclusion that everyone came up with.

Correct! :yepp:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acoma_Andy

Maximum speed for me at CL4, with 1.9v.

So you maxed out about where Tony, Eugene and I did too, all of those kits seem to be very good!

This post is mainly to inform you that I'm having issue with my board's BIOS and I had a short weekend. Will try to fix it tomorrow and continue CL5 testing.
05-24-2009, 11:58 AM
QerryTerry

Got these sticks too, tested them but only reached ~1150 MHz 5-5-5-18. Have an Biostar I45 TPower. Don't know if this board doesn't like these sticks. But they are fine at 4-4-4-13 and 1020MHz. I couldn't lower the voltage under 1.9V. With Auto in the BIOS it defaults to 2.1 volts :shocked: .
05-24-2009, 01:01 PM
Tony

moan at Biostar...you need true 1.8V or lower to get the best as some modules hate 1.9V+.

I have the same board here and it won't save to cmos...new bios and still buggy
05-24-2009, 04:15 PM
Eagle_Watch

Quote:

Originally Posted by QerryTerry

Got these sticks too, tested them but only reached ~1150 MHz 5-5-5-18. Have an Biostar I45 TPower. Don't know if this board doesn't like these sticks. But they are fine at 4-4-4-13 and 1020MHz. I couldn't lower the voltage under 1.9V. With Auto in the BIOS it defaults to 2.1 volts :shocked: .

have you tried with all the different rcomp configuration? each memory likes one diferent setting of that
05-25-2009, 12:51 PM
QerryTerry

No haven't tested with different rcomp settings, i set it to auto. PL was set to 8. But i didn't tested it further because my Quad doesn't run stable with an FSB over 500 MHz. Had OCZ Elite UE before, but they reached "only" 950 MHz with 5-5-5. So these sticks are way better.
05-27-2009, 11:52 AM
LuKe88

i ve gotta ask a question..
with these sticks i can reach easily 1200mhz 5-5-5-18 for daily use ?
05-27-2009, 12:10 PM
18 is # 1

Quote:

Originally Posted by LuKe88

i ve gotta ask a question..
with these sticks i can reach easily 1200mhz 5-5-5-18 for daily use ?

All results seem to indicate that if your mobo can handle high RAM speeds, then yes these will work at 1200 MHz and do it at 1.9v or less. Please keep in mind that this is a new product and reliability and longevity have yet to be demonstrated. On the other hand, OCZ usually makes high quality stuff.
05-27-2009, 12:30 PM
mkk

I know it's Blade 1066 topic, but I just don't want to multple it.

Blade LV 1200 CL5
Vdimm = 2,15
266/800

I know it is crazy V for those sticks, but the result for 2x2 is good :)

http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/894/ddr2nicemhz.jpg

http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/762...mhzeverest.jpg

Will keep testing with lower V.
05-27-2009, 12:41 PM
Zeus

Wow, 2.15V? This encourages me to push a little more, 1.9V was not enough for DDR1030 4-4-4 or DDR1250 5-5-5 for me.

After seeing this i might try 1.94-1.96V.

Did the sticks get hot with that much Vdimm?
05-27-2009, 01:22 PM
zsamz_

dfi x48 verry strong with 4 gig sets zeus;)
05-27-2009, 02:07 PM
mkk

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeus

Wow, 2.15V? This encourages me to push a little more, 1.9V was not enough for DDR1030 4-4-4 or DDR1250 5-5-5 for me.

After seeing this i might try 1.94-1.96V.

Did the sticks get hot with that much Vdimm?

Yes, sticks becomes warm over 1,9V and hot @ 2,15.
I used no AC. Lucky me, I didn't burned them. Needed to check sticks temp.

I definitely don't suggest You should try such a high V. Just wanted to check their oc abilities. There is lot of space for higher V, but I'm not sure how it will affect durability. I'm afraid they won't sustain this kind of V for a long time.

My kits results
@ 1,9 1300 5-5-5-15 not stable. 1280 should be ok. Didn't stressed it for a long time, but i'm 90% sure they can handle it.
@ 1,9 1000 4-4-4-15 not 100% stable.

1340 5-6-6-18 @ 2,0 passes 1M :p:
05-27-2009, 04:59 PM
Eagle_Watch

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkk

I know it's Blade 1066 topic, but I just don't want to multple it.

Blade LV 1200 CL5
Vdimm = 2,15
266/800

I know it is crazy V for those sticks, but the result for 2x2 is good :)

http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/894/ddr2nicemhz.jpg

http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/762...mhzeverest.jpg

Will keep testing with lower V.

Isnt it a too low score in everest for 1066mhz cl4 pl5??
05-27-2009, 05:02 PM
zsamz_

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eagle_Watch

Isnt it a too low score in everest for 1066mhz cl4 pl5??

:yepp: extremely low he must have other settings way loose
05-27-2009, 11:43 PM
Shahryar_NEO

@ Mkk : decrease tRFC ...
05-28-2009, 01:34 AM
Eagle_Watch

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shahryar

@ Mkk : decrease tRFC ...

54 isnt too high.

I still dont understand how that score is so low :para:
05-28-2009, 03:37 AM
mattkosem

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eagle_Watch

54 isnt too high.

I still dont understand how that score is so low :para:

FSB maybe? He's running async. I know I never saw everest bandwidth numbers that were any good running async on my Core2 rigs. Looking through some old benchmarks, 460 FSB@550 Mem was 1700MB/sec slower than 536 FSB at 1:1 with the same timings on my e8600. Quads are hard to use at high FSBs though.

--Matt
05-28-2009, 04:36 AM
A2C

it´s looks as a finaly generation of DDR2, but the best :up:
somebody know what chips have this modules?

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page