Printable View
Ok , just tested cat 8.9beta (8.53)
crysis bech almost same results as cat 8.8 beta (sample4800X2-8.52.2)
Cat 8.9 Beta
1680x1050
Very High
DX10
Average = 38.54 Fps
http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/8...verymg9.th.jpg
------------
----------
cat 8.9 beta
1680x1050
Very High
Anti-Aliasing 2x
DX10
Average = 37 Fps
http://img357.imageshack.us/img357/5...ryaahw6.th.jpg
:up:
i really loved reading this :)
great results whit this card.
What do you recommend? These latest drivers 8.9beta ore 8.8 ?
Tomorow i should have my own card :D ( I hope :) )
Quote:
Originally Posted by nigelke
thnks
im using the catalyst 8.9 beta (8.53) since the performance is the same as 8.8beta ! :up:
regards
mascaras,
Heres loaded temps on water. :wasntme:
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p.../Loadtemps.jpg
The difference is hugh. The card is begging to be watercooled. :rofl:
I just got this card today but the HIS Hightech part. I ran mine totally stock along with my Q9650 stock and scored only 8912 in Vantage...does that sound right to you guys? My idle temps were 80c!!! This card is definitely getting water-cooled. Now I'm wondering if a single triple rad will cool a quad and this videocard sufficiently.
Any input on my Vantage score would be great...I'm using the official driver available on ATI's site. I read about an official ATI BIOS update for this videocard...is this true and if so has anyone used it yet?
great to hear :DQuote:
Originally Posted by mascaras
today is going to be a party :D
8912 marks in vantage Extreme or Performance mode??Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE76
about bios i didnt flash the card with any bios , im using the original Bios !
Temperature just use Rivatuner 2.11 to control Fan speed !
:up:
Quote:
Originally Posted by NaeKuh
:yepp::yepp::up:
reagrds
Crysis Warhead Benchmark
http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/2858/warud4.jpg
E8400 @ 3.8Ghz
HD4870X2 Default
Catalyst 8.9
Windows Vista 64bit
1920x1200
Enthusiast
Level : AVALANCHE
DX10
Average :35 fps
http://img244.imageshack.us/img244/5...alanchecv6.jpg
------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
E8400 @ 3.8Ghz
HD4870X2 Default
Catalyst 8.9
Windows Vista 64bit
1680x1050
enthusiast
Level : Airfield
DX10
Average : 42.5 fps
http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/4...10benchuk8.jpg
-----------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
E8400 @ 3.8Ghz
HD4870X2 Default
Catalyst 8.9
Windows Vista 64bit
1680x1050
Enthusiast
Level : Airfield
DX9
Average : 50 fps
http://img131.imageshack.us/img131/8272/dx9benchoh1.jpg
:up:
...
Hey whats up with my gx2 texture fill rates and pixel fillrates being better than the 4870x2? oh and the bandwidth is better?http://s356.photobucket.com/albums/o...vshd4870x2.jpg
stupid picture this is the link: http://i356.photobucket.com/albums/o...vshd4870x2.jpg
How much of an improvement over the original Crysis?
Your picture shows 4870x2 being in 2D mode. So those are the 4870x2 fillrates when clocks are only 507MHz for core and only 500MHz for memory.Quote:
Originally Posted by 0_o-Roy
Can i run a Hd4870x2 on an ASUS M/B formula extreme with an 8800GTX OC for physics?
Not sure if this thread is dead or not..
Any one with issues : Text flickering, Shaders, flash and light issues, text flashing in game (Crysis command prompt press the § button)