Printable View
hey before i thought my Gigabyte was weird as i started to notice some strange behaviour like that heh :up:
absolute best FSB i can get out of SS cooling and 9xmulti with E8500 and SS
need that half a multi :(
45K efficiency too :D on DDR2
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/3...5137mhzhh5.png
Heavy stuff, Dino. Do you still have headroom? You're still not sub45k :D (3Mhz less or 0,06s less)
Damn, my previous drawing was pretty crappy, here's what I really meant by two lines:
of courseQuote:
Originally Posted by massman
i want to break 45K past 5.5GHz ;) :D
if i could only find a motherboard that can handle these RAM sticks it would be soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much fun
http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/968...msuperpsw4.png
this particular gigabyte is shaving off 10-15MHz FSB on another board :(
and slot 3 and 4 clock a LOT worse so no dual channel serious DDR3 benching until i find something else
my asus P5E3 DLX is dead :(
to break 45k, you don't need DDR3 ;)
i would like to smash it :DQuote:
Originally Posted by massman
DDR2 is possible to
there are no tweaks there at all LOL in my runs
Seriously? Raw system power at 45k PP? :eek:
yeah man :DQuote:
Originally Posted by massman
but 32M times suck lol so gotta work that out heh
Should do more research, but I reckon it's all about the 570FSB, no?
nahQuote:
Originally Posted by massman
i can do that at lower FSB too
it's this board and bios
Same advantage as the 0401 bios of the Maximus Formula SE? Do you have a higher PP when using another bios of the same board? If so, what's the difference with the other biosses?
So many questions :p:
GB has crap bioses aside from first releases IMO for extreme overclocking
for normal use and stuff they should be similar donno
So F2 outperforms F5 (with updated 45nm support)?
LOL, it seems like bios updates slow down the 45nm cpu's :D
problem is that you can't clock FSB on anything other than F2Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
so if you plan to be stuck around 450MHz FSB on a dual core that can do another 100+ good luck ROFL
clock for clock it was a touch slower too
1M uses CPU cache should it should be some kind of indicator i guess and first bios is just fine
i asked gigabyte for half multies to be added to F2 DDR3 bios and F3 DDR2 bios
if that happens all is good and i will not change bioses after i get the half multies heh
true thatQuote:
Originally Posted by massman
http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/1...iciencyzf3.png
not optimised yet
Still no tweaks?
still no tweaks
ran it again
http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/3...iciencytt7.png
As far as I know, you now are the most efficient bencher behind OPB and Coolaler ... :D
Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
He's just another cheater. :rofl:
Haha, Zeus :)
Just wondering at what PP he would be with tweaks and even better rams :)
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
well i have been hanging out at OCX :shocked: :D
anyways here is the problem
no tweaks here either 'cept for LSC of course
http://img523.imageshack.us/img523/7...16mhz45uv8.png
it could be the case that my OS is just really dirty
did i mention i keep reusing the same install on all Intel chipset motherboards cause i'm lazy to install an OS from scratch :eek: :D
my 1M tweaks are not that greatQuote:
Originally Posted by massman
probably just low maxmem value
i reckon it would probably go down to 44.85K at most
Low maxmem? Why is the real memory a number with 10 digits then?
i haven't applied any tweaks yetQuote:
Originally Posted by massman
i am saying when i bench 1M i just lower the maxmem value and start benching
hey Dinos, you don't have a separate HDD for benching? :eek: Why no perf. level 6/7 @ 513?