Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
ok man,but when you have try this tweak?is new?It's the same of cooaler?
can we know this tweak?for kill 0,2 with a lower frequency and the same settings it would be a very important tweak.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
ok man,but when you have try this tweak?is new?It's the same of cooaler?
can we know this tweak?for kill 0,2 with a lower frequency and the same settings it would be a very important tweak.
The checksum can be validated too. Do you expect OPB to give away all his secret optimizations? He worked very hard to get this 1M time. If it was Team Japan, no one would question them, nor would anyone ask about their secrets. Why is OPB treated differently? Would you divulge all your secrets if someone asked you to? Do you think calling him a cheater (with no proof) will make him divulge his secrets in order to defend himself? No one should have to do that. Remember, overclocking is a competition...you can't expect to be handed everything.
One last thing, congrats OPB.
Awesome :toast:
Truly impressive :thumbsup:
@ coolaler... when are you gonna get benching again... still @ 9.000 SuperPi 1M? :)
even if i agree in part with my italian friends i must do my grats to you OPB;)
this is a very impressive results, and you have an impressive tweak too:slapass:
waiting for 8m and 32m now:clap:
i wasn't gonna post, but this stuck out at me.... there's a lot more to memory timings than what CPU-Z shows. a LOT. get your "facts" straight before accusing someone who is constantly redefining extreme to be lying to us. if you're so sure that it is fake, why don't you prove it, huh? :slapass:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ludus
no respect to those who don't give any :slap:
Yes, Master Yoda. :bows:Quote:
Originally Posted by charlie
Incredible OPB.
Whats the Highest benchable with @ 3D?
But really.. 11/10.. fantastic stuff.
INSANE opb, you predicted your WR and you have it :). Any chance you give the 3d benches a chance ?
To ALL conspiracy-and-cheats-believers: Lay down and have some rest ... if you think benchmarking is all about cheating, you should better stop and go fishing.
HOLLY MOTHER OF GOD!!! You took the WR in a big way. Congrats on that OPB.
Oh, ...
Need a helping hand? My salary can be watching you break records and polish RAM sticks :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
Thank you :toast:
Translate English :toast:
http://forum.coolaler.com/showpost.p...9&postcount=45
Congratulations article civalize look great ~ ~ mad for a long time ... finally succeeded crashed into the realm of p ... Little did she expect that she would P5WDH break ... is a terrible ... this will not be the mastermind of a lazy oh ... every day ... haha he was Fansi Yesterday, I even told him I maxmem discuss the problem anymore.I was never really in Unadvisable apply maxmem is to be set up like 104 or 512 ... 600 ... 256 is not expected.104 is the right time, but the memory is there in the 2x512.to double the original to be the best way to deal with the proper and stable than 104mb.
http://forum.coolaler.com/showpost.p...2&postcount=49
Congratulations less frenzy, the first eight seconds when the male vein lower than roro 19mhz, pi has a fast 0.2 seconds.fsb os and it is very important not know Vcore number, and C is his u is the same?Unfortunately, some feel that C is his shoulders.If the measurements above the 5.8 GHz band should be 1.73v 5526 pi 8.5 seconds on the strength of this proportion could not be considered;Before I go 5566mhz also try using 14x400 5600mhz.na run 1,200 2:3.4-4-3 ... the pi 1m 1m 9.125s 5566mhz worse there than in 1 :1 position, the higher the frequency, the greater the burden mch and ram, the relatively higher Vcore increases,cpu load greater, although the frequency of super elevated,But, it will reduce the efficiency of C. .. This is the great debate yesterday and today .. So I put vcore dropped 1.75v.vmch use 1.9v, 2.55v vdimm use all reasonable limits,coupled with the transfer of the regulation has, naturally fast. omega 8m run on the very fact of God.I like it there is no way to break the 16m, I have to go to 8m.The result is 0.372 lose the next bar .. like ..
Hey dudes, do you really think that XIP like OPB or coolaler need to cheat for getting WR? Two days ago i saw an excellent overclock of s.O.t, and saw OPB benching hard. Now I see that OPB got a WR and the first 8.XXX 1m result, and all italian people begin to doubt of a master of overclocking.
Dudes do you really think that OPB need cheating to get it? I dont wanna generalice but IMHO all italians were hoping a italian spi1 wr, and now they see that a taiwanese oc master got it before... just complaining? I dont know... only know that just suck.
Id never doubt of a dude like opb, coolaler, or all PRTeamJapan, beacause they have too high reputation to loose it only for cheating...
Coolaler? He is more like OC teacher in Taiwan Now, He gave me his best OC concept when I was noob.Quote:
Originally Posted by Garrett
He will continue to bench and get the awesome results as usual.:)
Hey Kevin.... be careful, Godfather is coming back... :)
Please go on with your superb ocs and benches and don't pay attention to ridiculous people... the steak was to big for their stomach
Some of the translation is totally wrong, some is correct...
you got about 70%
you can ask if shamino wanna read that;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by boblemagnifique
:toast: well done OPB :toast:
Great result OPB.
How much work this took shows that 8 seconds would be extremely hard. I think we might be stuck in 9's until 45 nm.
OPB he is the king of de spi and OC
The one who doubts OPB's word is for envy....
That I am a fan of OPB:banana:
regards
I was too busy to read this thread last night. Anyways, I am here now. Gratz Kevin! :clap: and can you please go get some sleep now? I beg you bro.... get some sleep. Don't make me call your gf and ask her force you to. :p:.
Just take it easy for today.
Jason is right! You deserve some booze and massage :D , my TREAT! :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
it is a simple translation by google ;)
it isn't has me to contact other people to check what you say on the forum of coolaler, each one must have its idea
I doesn't question the results of the benchs but of the frequencies which made to obtain them :cool:
That make since more 1 Years that you have make screens with scores/Fréquency incredible and that nobody can make…
You have surely a OS and tweaks out of the commun run for carried out performances also enormous but accumulated all this, some start has to have some doubt on the level of these tweaks magic ....
But for me to make a benchs and then to lower the frequency (Setfsb, clock gen….) to make believe very good tweaks has is very easy A to make and it is what seems most logical with the questions that I am posed since more than 1 year… :cool:
And this makes him a xtreme oc tweaker, he is OPB :)Quote:
Originally Posted by boblemagnifique
if OC was only frequency probably anyone with ln2 = xtreme legend or something like this...:rolleyes:
Nice to conclude that OPB is untouchable :D
Too many fans... They don't understand something : the score is real but the bench frequency is around 150MHz higher.
Coolaler reached 9 sec on 5526mhz, this result was reached on 5549mhz.Quote:
Originally Posted by boblemagnifique
The record has fallen, get used to it.
you think that i don't know the impartance of alpha timings? in the screen there are also Memtest with all alpha timings :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzimark
i write what i think and i think with my head... that's all.
how do you think that i can prove the contrary?
i know only that the time for the frequency is strange, ok the optimizations, but i know also that gained 0.3seconds at this frequency is very hard, morever not VS a neewbie, but under serious team overclockers with very good so. maybe OPB and coolaler have a new super tweacking metods.
sorry OPB, i don't have nothing against you and sorry for the flame in this topic. :)
lolQuote:
Originally Posted by jmax_oc
if you can totally manipulate the question I list below, I can say, you even can do better than I did here. Just like Omega-san's 8m is untouchable even I use 5450 and still 0.3s short and he only used 5369mhz I think maybe you need to doubt that as well.;)
************************************************** **
Since Alex from the Italy Shark Team PM me, I think I can post here
about the hint I gave him:
but I use question ask you instead of Answer
Have you try to compare the windows 2000 achitecture with xp and 2003 original by checking the each file
allocation size you set? or you just use default?
What and how you set or deal with your paging file for virtual memory usage ? is there any difference before
and after you doing the well-know copy-waza tweak? How far you understand the copy-waza tweak?
How good that you understand exactly what type of service you need to keep and abandon when you bench super pi?
Have you really observe the reaction after you change the frequency from either setfsb or clock-gen and
immediately running super pi and got what type of error message? and what kinda error message you get?
Not exactly run or not convergent in sqr? and what is that ?
have you tried stop the calculation in the middle of running and NOT cleaning the cache(run a 16k then re-do
it) and run it over..? and what result will be? faster or slower?
have you think about just using keyboard instead of mouse to operate that calculation ?
under 9 :rolleyes:
go s.o.t. :banana: next step under 8 sec and 6 ghz :toast: :banana: :woot:
Opb, u'll can try my requests there are some pages? :)