The Close spi1m to 8.xxxs from Coolaler

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wa77ss

Liquid Helium IS way too cold for computers, end of story :p:

---

Yeah, but this is about Extreme!! Some Super Extreme Cold lol, kidding :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wa77ss

Liquid Helium IS way too cold for computers, end of story :p:

---

No, but the price isnt reasonable.. Its about 28$/Liter - and you use MORE LHe than LN... - Also, its a bit more dangerous, and wont work good without a LHE / LN pump to keep pressure high since it kinda' travel upwards due the light weight ;)

1L Liquid Nitrogen is 62x Liters "air nitrogen" - dont know with LHe, but doesnt seem too be the same, as far as I've understod..

CONGRATULATIONS! :toast: :clap: :clap:

What is copywaza? What are the chances of getting EXACTLY 9.000secs? Good luck on 8.999! I get 4min29s lol.

Congratulations !!!!!!!
Its great to see how the C2D performs at those amazing clocks.

Go for the 8.xxx s :)

:woot: :woot: :woot: :woot: :woot:

vary vary nice!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Oj101

CONGRATULATIONS! :toast: :clap: :clap:

What is copywaza? What are the chances of getting EXACTLY 9.000secs? Good luck on 8.999! I get 4min29s lol.

---

a tweak...
Search and you shall find.

give some more overclock

aah,the sub 9s will have to wait for the new generation of procs,I suppose...

Great job Coolaler :) !

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sesto Sento

i don't think that it is too cold, maybe it didn't boot because of cold boot bug... probably is possible to boot with a higher temp (-100 or something like that) and then drop it inside of the pot to full cold power :P

what's the liquid helium temps? -256c isn't it?

---

Liquid Helium is -269 °C
Liquid Hydrogen is -252.8 °C

They are more expensive than liquid nitrogen because the cascades used to make the liquid are very expensive to run. I remember reading somewhere about a Helium cascade that took 70mins just to start up!!

Didn't I argue with somebody, perhaps Charlie, that 9.00s wouldn't be broken till the end of the year, and no chance of getting anywhere near 8.00s till well into next year?

Well, still waiting for the 2nd part, but I guess I might have been wrong on the first part. If you get <9.00s before Dec31, 2006, then my prediction would have been proven wrong (btw: I think it was made when you were still trying to get down to 10.00sec.. which was very exciting :)