OMG Vince you are scaring me man :slobber: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
GJ :toast:
Printable View
OMG Vince you are scaring me man :slobber: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
GJ :toast:
Indeed, congratulations on your time. The speed at which you did it makes it even better.
Congrats KP, that's an amazing run. You could crush the competition with Roro's clocks in 32m.
hey Vince are you sure Maxmem=600 won't give you even a more efficient score buddy...............do that and give it another crack while you're at it...........i want to see 8m 5Xs time :D for the 8m class here :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: heheheheheh
another thing you can try depending on how good your board is .....cool that vMCH and give it some DICE and 2.0V and try for 4:5 RATIO and lower RAM clocks as the latencies are tighter.................i think i found that 500MHz on RAM at 5-4-4-8 timings was equivalent in speed to 600MHz on memory in 2:3 ratio with 5-5-4-x timings
Wow Vince, that's another job well done!! :eek2::toast: :toast:
Do you think you can top that score at higher cpu speed or are you running out of memory speed?
Very nice Vince! Congrats :toast:
I wish I can bench these clocks one day to challenge you buddy ;) What was the temp during the bench?
I've stopped using maxmem myself... Doesn't really help, a good copy-waza is the key to be focused on. :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Ha, ha, ha.......Did you use the "OPB cheat" - oh sorry OPB tweak I wanted to say - Vince?......:DQuote:
Originally Posted by k|ngp|n
Quote:
Originally Posted by k|ngp|n
how much vdimm was used may i ask ? :)
HEHEHEHHEHEHE and about 20 other names inserted there too :banana: :slapass:Quote:
Originally Posted by hipro5
i haven't yet tested maxmem with all the other tweaks inluding the luna+silver+wazza+highclockinstall....just sold off my gear and looking out for something else to play with, so for the moment only E6300ES to play with lol but at least i can give it a crack in the 1066 strap and lower categories even though i'll pay a sizable penalty for B1Quote:
Originally Posted by before
i think Vince should look into 4:5 as well though
Agree here......Less internal latency....;)Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Unfortunately, it's hard to make 4:5 working... guess it becomes a matter of chipset.
I was running about -120c to -125c on the cpu, still unlapped. Can do 5374mhz 1m at little bit colder like -125c to -127c/1.87v. I think with more than 1.92v, this could end up being a 5400mhz+ 3d cpu. I will go back to 3d soon, so we'll see.Quote:
Originally Posted by before
I tried some diff maxmem sizes with no success on core2, doesnt seem to help like it did with fx57/maxmem104.
Hey before, if you have problems with your next container you try, you should get one of my EVO's man :D. I can walk away from the pc after a pour to get something to eat from the fridge, hit the bathroom and come back to about 2-3degress less temperature at nearly 5300mhz/1.87v mid 32m.
Benching one unit in superpi with core2 is tooo easy.
ah you make me jealous bro! That's an impressive pot for sure. :D
Will get my new solid copper container this evening; a kind of MM rev.2 replica; but much longer. Hope it'll rock...
Who made it? I am sure it will be good.Quote:
Originally Posted by before
Big difference between running 3d and 2d as for load on the container of course. Single threaded sp just doesnt push the chips that hard. As soon as you go over 1.9v, the heat output goes up big time though. Trick is to find that zone with the chip where the heat ouput/voltage is perfect. That's when I like benching ln2 :D
Wait till you run some 06' with quadcore :eek:, that is the toughest test of a unit IMO.
It was made by the University of Grenoble (France) Department of Physics... a chance, my mother is an Honorary Professor of Biochemistry at the university... so it helps;
I'm waiting for QX6700 + P5N32 + 8800GTX lent by a magazine... Will be the opportunity to test the container into strong conditions :D
#1 or #2? :p: BTW, nice work on that 32m :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by k|ngp|n
Maybe you - or anybody else for that matter - can help me figure out what the hell is going on with this Intel rig I've got here. I thought it'd be fun to try to go sub-13 min @ 3600, but it turns out I spent most of the night trying to go sub-14 min @ 3600 . I applied almost every tweak I know of - keep in mind that I only know AMD tweaks - and didn't even break into the 13's. WTF IS WRONG????? This is on an EVGA 680i and the memory's @ 2.5V. For the record, these stix are a pair of gems as they'll boot @ 4-4-3-4, DDR2 1250 at 2.5Vmem....too bad they don't run worth a crap @ that speed though. Time to do the vmem mod....;)
http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/9...332m2k3eb5.jpg
http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/6...032m2k3lc2.jpg
:woot: :clap:Quote:
Originally Posted by k|ngp|n
Now I know why I couldn't beat such scores clock by clock ;).
Could You post the subtimings used, please?
What about 1M 2:3?
And what is limiting now? :D
And last question: i975X with 4:5 - how high it will go?
@s7e9h3n: Command Rate 1T is very important for NV680i (and the chipset isn't really good in Pi...). And also not all memory ratios are good. If You can run 3:2 ratio linked 1T (mem @ 1066 1T of course, don't know if possible) it will be much better.
And yes, 4:5 is extremaly difficult on i965 - Commando with 2,025V @ NB (aircooled, but REALLY low temperature, ambient <0°C and HR-05 + some fans) tops @ ~425 FSB (with optimized subtimings and 1066 strap of course).
nah JMKS - 1T won't help unless you can get memory to do 520+ mhz 4-4-4-4 1T with tight sub timings. Most high end Micron D9 are doing around 430-450mhz 4-4-x-x 1T with 2.4-2.6+ vdimm only
Doesn't help for 3dmark either 1T if you have ram that does 533mhz 4-3-3-4 2T tight sub timings either > http://i4memory.com/showthread.php?t=3773
you need 600+ mhz on memory on either 965/975 or 680i platform to even come close and probably need B2 stepping core2 for 10-20 seconds clock for clock faster times than B1Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/680...3m13s859ms.png
try 600mhz 4-3-3-4 to see
Lol....1066@1t? Sheesh....that's not gonna be too easy. I'll try 32m @ as hgih as 1t will take me and post back...thanks...Quote:
Originally Posted by JMKS
@ Eva: Exactly how much over 600+? ;) My sticks are capable of it. Just need a tad bit more Vmem....Maybe it's time I try running 4x1gb ddr2 1200 @ 4-3-3-4 :hehe:
heh #3 ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
and def what eva said Steve. First thing I learned when I started benching 32m was to ditch the b1 stepping. Pretty significant difference in time between the two steppings. Something to do with cache utilization?? Not sure.
well my ram is capable of 640mhz 5-4-3-4 2T at 2.5v but had to loosen sub timings too much that it was slower than my 600mhz 5-3-3-3 very tight sub timings at 9x400FSB.. so i'd say you'd need 622-640mhz 4-3-3-4 with same tight sub timings as at 600mhz 4-3-3-4 to get their on 680i platform.
I just don't have the ram to do that and I limit myself to under 2.5-2.6v vdimm as I like my ram and don't want to kill them hehe
It's gotta have something to do with the cache as the 1m times seem at least close to par....I'm not in any position to ditch this cpu as it's not mine :p: But maybe it'll be good for a few 1m passes @ -100C on the auto :D Oh well, I guess for 32m, I'll just have to wait for a few quads from AMD ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by k|ngp|n
@ EvaL OK...I'll try tighter...but for some 1m runs instead. I guess we've established that this cpu is a POS in 32m :p:
??? bull i install windows o/c'ed all the time and i get 32.7xx in 1m ... so ur saying if i install windows on stock it will be even slower?Quote:
Originally Posted by Stapler
only a prob if you are in for 3.6ghz challenge.. if you can clock B1 higher than B2 to a pt then overall 32M might be faster than B2 but with -100C monster of yours I'm sure you'll be able to max out any cpu LOL
Any cpu EXCEPT a quad-core :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
Owkey, I installed a few server03 OS'es with my 3000+ venice at:Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
7x200=1400
8x200=1600
9x200=1800
9x333=3000
Same timings, mem speed ... Only the multiplier changed the first three installations. The last one was done with 133 divider.
The 3000 > 1800 > 1600 > 1400 installation when benching at the same speeds.
Are you speaking of installation times or actual speed of the benchmarks when you refer to one being faster than the other? Got any screenshots for bench results?Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
BTW-- my comment about installing the OS overclocked was joking ,that is definitely not one of my tweaks lol :D
In fact the last time I installed 2k3 I did it at 800mhz more than previous time because I was too lazy to go back into bios to lower settings, and the times were indentical on all of my pre-ln2 run checks.
Actual speed of benchmarks. Results were on the crashed OCX forum and I haven't saved the screens.Quote:
Originally Posted by k|ngp|n
S7 there are two things not helping you thereQuote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
the chip is B1 stepping
you are on 680i mobo
move to P965/975 and find a B2 chip and you will start hitting low 13M :toast:
i just find this comicalQuote:
Originally Posted by massman
can you tell us what the difference in times was between 1M and 32M at same CPU speeds after every one of those installs
Managed to shave off more than 30MHz for sub 13minutes:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...2min573755.jpg
:)
Still miles away from KP though.
Probably the fastest for i975X yet though.
Zeus have you tried 3-3-3-x timings on 975X.....you should be able to do better with tighter timings from what i've seen on all W.R. attempts with 975X ...none of them ran CAS4
Hm, getting the CAS 3 power to do it would be difficult. I should have tried when I had the chance. My guess is 460x8-470x8 3-3-3 with the right subs would pull it. But yes, 450 3-3-3 is about 5-10 seconds faster than 500 4-4-3 on i975x, though it takes a hell of a lot more voltage, and much better clocking silicon for both the ram and northbridge.
I did 13:21 myself at 450x8, never posted it out of shame against these super 965 times. :D
I was really intrigued by this so decided to give it a little test for myself and here is what I found:-Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
Installed at 9 x 266 (2.4GHz) - Bench run at 9 x 400 (3.6GHz)
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q...ultinstall.png
Then I installed @ 9 x 500 (4.5GHz) - Bench run at 9 x 400 (3.6GHz)
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q148/JAFFA22/4.png
I figured that the vast difference in clocks at install should show any inconsistency if there was any, but basically they turned out pretty much identical, Slightly interesting that the second run started out marginally quicker then slowed down until in the end it was a couple of seconds slower, but nothing to get excited about.
Oh well was worth a try, nothing ventured nothing gained as they say :toast: :D
Maff
nice one Herms (Maff) :D :lol2:
so much for that theory heh
Farrrk me Maff I dont think I have ever seen anyone load an OS @ 9x500 :shocked: :party: :cheer:
I tried but something on my rig has a big dislike for CAS 3, don't know wheter it's the board or the RAM, tried to boot at 350 with 2.4V but it doesn't make it all the way into windows.Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Somewhere in the end when it's loading the USB driver for my wireless dongle it's hanging.
I think the mem should be capable of doing CAS 3 somewhere up to 400MHz at least (Gskill 6400HZ) with reasonable voltage.
Also tried 2:3 divider but that's a sort of same story as CAS 3, the board probably hates it.
I will try some more but i don't want to fubar my OS as it's my everyday install. :D
I tried 4-3-3-7 with my HZ's in sig and no matter the Vdimm or sub timings they just wont play stable, thats using both 975 and 965 boards :confused:
Heh, heh, heh........We are all of theories and nothing else as for gain....
My theory is to install Windows at 166MHz fsb with the lower multi x 6 ......Thas will give you EXACLTY 6.780sec less in 32M......;) :rolleyes:
LOL, try installing XP with this then :DQuote:
Originally Posted by hipro5
From here --> http://www.winhistory.de/more/386/xpmini_eng.htm
Dumn!......I bet that you'll get the BEST time even.....:DQuote:
Originally Posted by SLi_dog
My first result with new mem kit. Stil a lot of work to be done :D Need a little more vdimm for 600 4-4-4.
570 4-4-4:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...2M57144410.jpg
I wish I'd remember, but I tested it a long time ago. If you want ... I can't give it another try this weekend ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Windows XP?Quote:
Originally Posted by HermS
yes massman.
I used Server03 to do the tests + A64.Quote:
Originally Posted by HermS
I just checked my other hdd, but haven't found the screens :(. If there is serious interest, I'll do the tests again this weekend. If you all think this is worth nothing, please tell me, so I won't waste time.
Finally making some progress....Check out the Vmem ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
http://img76.imageshack.us/img76/769...332m2k3wx9.jpg
Very nice memclocks and timings but the calculationtime is still bad.
Congrats on breaking 14 minutes, must have been a relief. :D
Yep, but remember, this cpu is a garbage 32m chip on a garbage 32m platform. Maybe I'll have to borrow a 965 or 975 board and see what happens :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
Heh, don't let George (eva) catch you saying that the 680i is a garbage Pi platform. :p:
Perhaps the subs need some work?
How can they get any tighter? :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
I take that you refuse to get an Intel rig yourself bro?
Why don't you get a P5B deluxe and a B2 chip and show us how it's done man. ;)
I got p5n-e (650i) today, will take a look how bad it is :D
Uhhhh....uhhhhhh.....your tRAS could be 3!Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
:runs:
You will need lower tRFC I believe.
Just for you :toast: Any other bright ideas? :p: LOL And, NO, I'm not gonna try to run CL3 or 1T @ 600 :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/7...332m2k3to4.jpg
TBH, 20's as low as I've seen myself on a 32m. OPB has said in the past that 18 is possible...I believe it, but haven't yet tried. Even at 18 though, the most I'd pick up would be ~1.5 - 2 seconds total off of the 32m @ trfc20....Quote:
Originally Posted by NiCKE^
You could use the Windows XP theme in olive or silver and run SuperPi in realtime prio if you didn't already, that might shave off another second or so... :D
S7 the timings are nice and tight...but the issue is still 680i + B1 chip for you............check eva2000's screenshots as he's been able to put the striker to low 13M runs with such timings on B2 chip........
i don't know what the difference is between B1 and B2 in 32M runs but i assume it will be sizable
Right! Spi.exe needs theme service running in order to properly call uxtheme.dll millions of times during a run. :p: Then Luna theme is IMO way lighter than Classic... :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
does background image on Luna+silver change anything....noticed KP's been running a different oneQuote:
Originally Posted by before
:D :D :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
Maybe try to install Windows from the begining.....?
Thanx for the tip about the themes....didn't know about that one. I'm running 2k3, but will patch it with a theme. Already running priority though.......Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
@ Dinos: The difference is quite large between the B1 and B2. In fact, the B1 is by far the slowest of all the steppings. B3 is better, and B2's are the fastest......
Ok, let me rephrase: How can the timings get any tighter for mere mortals like us?Quote:
Originally Posted by hipro5
*Note: Hipro5 latencies are not applicable to 99.99% of the population. You have to either possess some sort of voodoo majic or have hardware manufactured @ Mt. Olympus to run such timings. :D
Yes, it's a new 2k3 install...by the way George, where do I find myself a Maximizer?
i've played with both chips and from what i could figure out it was about 16 seconds on 680i.........but i really should have done more testing on 680i and P965 to be more certain :(Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
I was joking...... :D Subtimings are already too tight..... ;) :)Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
Try 965.... :)
DDR Maximizer.......PM me for details.....;)
i'll have one if you're handing them out :D
will come in handy for an Aussie TV show on OCing i'll be a part of :D
ha ha, so you signed up eh dinos :DQuote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Gunna be wicked fun bro :D
yeah of course.....only because you and Rodney are comingQuote:
Originally Posted by SLi_dog
too bad eva2000 is a lazy bum :slapass: :D
OK, I tried the "theme tweak" and maybe the reason why I've never heard about it is because IT DOESN'T WORK :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by before
Luna Theme
http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/2...45032mawh6.jpg
Classic Theme
http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/7272/8x45032mer5.jpg
This is about as fast as this setup will go @ 3600. The only "big" tweak I didn't use was maxmem, but I never had too much success with it in the first place. It's quite amazing to see just how much the B2 steppings are faster than the B1's @ 32m. From what I'm told, while there's a difference in 1m's, the discrepancy isn't as bad.......
@Hipro: You'll be hearing from me in a bit ;)
I think that CPU just likes you only as much as you like it. :p:
It's true though, themes seems to help 1M noticeably, but doesn't have such a pronounced impact on 32M. I did however lose about 5 seconds, which isn't too bad for any tweak.
Some differences that I notice between you and eva-
You're at CAS 4, he's running CAS 5. Your FSB is 450, his is 400. Now one would think that both of those would be working towards your advantage, but 680i is such an odd chipset, its a chance both are hurting. :S Perhaps the 3:4 divider in particular as an additional latency hit, or perhaps you're on a looser strap or something similar as you would be on i965 by running a higher FSB.
Yes, B1's are slower, but IIRC its more like 10-15 seconds or so and not 30. I only tried 32M once on a B1, and that was months ago. I don't recall the time being too far off the norm. But then again, perhaps the effect is more pronounced on 680i than on the Intel chipsets. :shrug:
Dumo said that his B1 was 45 seconds slower (~5%) in 32m...Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
450 fsb also is a higher strap than 400, as I hear it changes ~434ish and ~340 ish.
Cas 4-5 does not really matter all that much. Stephen, you might be running some timings too tight also :)
That's not at all what I experienced, but I never did a straight compare. 45 seconds sounds nuts.
THIS IS DUMO'S CPU ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by fhpchris
And what is all this talk about straps? :p:
Edit: And 5% sounds about right.....
Edit: So maybe I should try running the memory @ 622mhz Cl5? I started running 32m @ that speed 4-4-3-4, but obviously I didn't have enough Vmem since windows started closing by themselves until the whole OS locked up :D
B1 vs B2
~20 seconds
B2 E6600
32M SuperPI 3.6GHz CPU + 550MHz RAM 4-4-4-8 timings G.Skill HZ RAM
http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/3...4m04656wd9.jpg
[/B]
B1 E6600
3.6GHz 32M SuperPI 550MHz on RAM 4-4-4-8
http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/7...4m24875py1.jpg
^^That's more reasonable.
There's a difference here though....This cpu that I'm running is one of the first ES x6800's to come off the lot. Although Dino's tests show his cpu's aren't that far apart, I have feeling that it's not the same case for the x6800's. If I recall correctly, Kingpin posted a 32m run with his B1 @ a super high clockspeed as well as memspeed only the time was amazingly ugly for those clocks. His run must have been AT LEAST 5% off. Even the jap Oc'r Omega admitted that a RETAIL B2 x6800 Conroe has a 1-2 HUNDRED Mhz advantage over an ES B1 x6800 @ 5ghz+.....so, for example, a 5ghz B2 retail XE= a 5.2ghz ES B1 XE...
And Dinos, although you're comparing b1 vs. b2, both your cpu's are ES's. Therefore the B2 isn't necessarily an indication of how the retail B2's are.....
OK, well then what about the benches I ran earlier using the SAME FSB as eva....only I was running 4-3-3-4 @ 600 vs. his 5-3-3-3 @ 600? His time was almost 40 seconds faster than mine. Lets, for a second, just simply ignore the fact that 4-3-3-4 is faster than 5-3-3-3 under ANY conditions and compare only the cpu's. Eva's is a retail B2 which - according to your theory - has a 15 second MAX advantage over the ES B1 I'm using. So doing a little math 40-15 = 25 seconds <--- that's how much faster Eva's run would be compared to mine IF it was a level playing field. Please, then, someone tell me the 25 SECONDS worth of tweaks for 32m that I'm either NOT doing or don't know about........:confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
It is very strange, I won't deny it. :shrug: And I don't know anything about 680i at all or how to run it.
And my B1 ES is a 6700, and my 6800 a retail B2. So who knows, perhaps that could be skewing things.
Tell ya what...Send me your b2 and I'll test it on the same rig....I guess I'll have to make this sacrifice for the good of the OCing community :D Bleh...Intel....:p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
You could try running something like 12x multi @ 300 FSB 1:2 unlinked :)Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
I might be able to pencil some voltage in and get 600mhz to pass 32m so we could compare to my quad...
Some of us just call them fatbodies :)Quote:
*Note: Hipro5 latencies are not applicable to 99.99% of the population. You have to either possess some sort of voodoo majic or have hardware manufactured @ Mt. Olympus to run such timings
Why would I run with the 12x multi? To see if the FSB has an impact on the 680i boards?Quote:
Originally Posted by fhpchris
Your quad is a b1 :p: ? IIRC, all of them are b3's....right?
Yes, I know....but sure as hell, my fatties can't even come close to what Hipro runs his at......:D
My Quad is a B3 ES :) Some were 1s IIRC..Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
This is From GHZ..
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v31/canny/4ghz.jpg
What do you 1m @ that cpu speed? I know he is running 1T, but we have 170+ mhz ram on him with tighter timings :)
B1 es is slow as hell in 32m, negligible difference in 1m. 27-28 sec difference in 32m betwen b2 es and b1 es. The b2 retail chip is just about identical to b2es and didnt really see any difference there at all in 32m. My b1 es was one of the very first as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
So b1es<b2es=b2retail :D
Hmmm...I've run it in the past, but not with this pair of mems...I'll try later. But FWIW, I can run a 1m @ 3600 at a bit under 14 sec. Don't remember exactly.....Quote:
Originally Posted by fhpchris
Thnx Vince....but one thing that would make it easier on both me and anybody else reading this thread - when we talk about the differences clock for clock between different steppings, it would be nice if we could state advantage and say @ what speed. A 30 second difference on a sub 10-min 32m is a much larger percentage than a 30 second difference on a 20-min run :)
Your right, didnt think of that. Well for me when I say 27-28 diff between the the two steppings, I am talking about aprox 3300-3400mhz cpu speed using 2:3 div config with 4-4-4-5.Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
So far so good....
http://www.itsjohnnybravo.com/Overcl...2M%2012-39.JPG
next stop is some software tweaks ;)
hey Johnny; I'll reply your PM ASAP ;)
So let me share this little run... first try with one of those Wintec kits I've received this morning.
AMPX PC2-8000C5 @2.61V DMM with a fresh install of Win XP and only LSC=1 + real time priority as tweaks... nothing more! All the other stuff was running, explorer.exe included.
I must say Wintec roxxes!! I definitely love this brand! TBH I didn't really expect performance like that; bloody hell!... D9GKX I guess. :rolleyes:
http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/9...m09672sfx6.png
So; I'll try to improve it under 2k3 and few tips.
Thats worth looking at before :toast: :clap: :banana:
like i said in the other topic ,the wintec has gkx mem irev210 has taken of the heatspreaders of one set. :)
can you try cl5-5-5 ?
Looks great! I see things are gonna be heating up quick. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by before
@Rol-Co: not yet :) what about yours?
@Gautam: hehe :D I've just started the copy-wazza a minute ago...
cant test them , they are still not here :( a few day's
edit:
and daniel tested only at dual 32m 4-4-4-5-4-35-3-10-5-12 2.45v p5b deluxe.
I can also confirm that they are GKX but don't know anything about their quality and the PCBQuote:
Originally Posted by Rol-Co
ahh too bad; I need to install 2k3 again... actual looks like corrupted. :(
I'll receive 25l of LN² tomorrow along with R1150 and a X6800 L624A... I need a perfect windows. :D
Here...ran last night:Quote:
Originally Posted by fhpchris
http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/7713/10x4001mmg6.jpg
What's wrong with your setup man?
With memspeed that high and timings that tight you should have around 12.500 seconds or better.
I did better with my RAM at only 444MHz and 4-4-4-12 timings.
It's time for a better CPU man, that B1 seem to suck, even in 1M.
Yep....it's a shame...this very x6800 used to be considered the TOP x6800 in all the land....now it's just an over-the-hill, handicapped cpu with a case of mild retardation (In other words -> it's slow) :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
Quick test on 650i, p5n-e
http://img57.imageshack.us/img57/2604/52327522ok3.jpg