Mine varies a lot.......
2 500 MB Western Digital Caviar 5000AKS SE16 16MB cache in RAID0 write back cache enabled
Printable View
Mine varies a lot.......
2 500 MB Western Digital Caviar 5000AKS SE16 16MB cache in RAID0 write back cache enabled
6 500GB + Highpoint RocketRAID 3520 controller 500GB partition
^^^^^
Do Want
Here are my 2x 640GB WD's in raid 0 300GB slice with write cache enabled.
http://img391.imageshack.us/img391/5...gbslicepu0.png
Wow those are some really impressive results. Why so high? Are those Caviars?Quote:
Originally Posted by vengance_01
Seagate 500gb 32mb cache x2 in Raid 0
Are they performing like they should? And are they doing good? I had some programs running when I ran the benchmark :P Maybe I should of closed some stuff lol
5x WD RE3 in RAID 5, controller Adaptec 5805
4x 320Gb Western Digital 7200rpm 16mb in Raid 0
Adaptec 5405 Raid controller
http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h9...p/Untitled.jpg
http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h9.../Untitled2.jpg
Not much faster than my WD Black 640 GB in my home pc
Update:
This first is a later try, with slightly better results. Whatever was in the background stopped running. I'll leave the original test below the new one.
HD Tune: OCZ CORE_SSD Benchmark
Transfer Rate Minimum : 79.2 MB/sec
Transfer Rate Maximum : 129.7 MB/sec
Transfer Rate Average : 113.3 MB/sec
Access Time : 0.2 ms
Burst Rate : 116.4 MB/sec
CPU Usage : 19.7%
HD Tune: OCZ CORE_SSD Benchmark
Transfer Rate Minimum : 1.4 MB/sec
Transfer Rate Maximum : 132.7 MB/sec
Transfer Rate Average : 110.6 MB/sec
Access Time : 0.6 ms
Burst Rate : 51.7 MB/sec
CPU Usage : 19.0%
Something was running, it was up and down bet. 125 and 100 mb/sec almost all the way out 'till the end, when something else caught it's eye.
4x OCZ Core v2 30GB SSD on ICH9R - Not bad for 200 bucks
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1228597038
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1228597038
You dont get the stuttering and pausing that everyone seems to get with those ssd drives?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob21
Intel X25-M SSD 80GB. Core i7 920 @ 3.2Ghz
What is the maximum bandwidth of the ICH9R SATA controller ?
has 6 ports of 300 MB/s, in theory with RAID0 can provide 1.8 GB/s, is it only theory ? in the practice have any limitations ?
6x intel ssd x25e 250 MB/s read RAID0, total 1.5 GB/s, is it possible ?
this is my current configuration, 4x 500GB 7200.10 RAID0 Slice 32GB system, the rest for data.
http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/6...4xraid0pr1.png
No the ichr 9 or ichr10 controllers typically max out anywhere around 600MB/s regardless how many ports it has. You will need dedicated raid card to go faster
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Bean
Something like this? ;)
Six SSD's??!!...damn, expensive.
tease, benches or gtfo imo :shocked:Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob21
+1 lol, gotta see some numbers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Levish
Here is 2 Intel X25-E
That is so WICKED. :shocked: Isn't the price for one 30GB X25-E like $700? You are one Xtreme person. :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob21
Test it again with all six and I will give you a e-cookie. :clap:
I bought myself 8GB of A-DATA DDR2-800 and created a 5GB RAMDisk :)
This drive is used for games but I need a mobo with 16GB limit :(
they are 2 new 640GB WD drives. Just simple Raid 0 setup with only about 150GB per drive being used. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by binormalkilla
that is just sick! Man I can't wait till I can get some decent SSD drives. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Bob21
Vista 64 long test
Raid 0 stripe 32k one partition
Abit Ip35 Pro ICHR9
2 x 160Gb WD1600AAJS
Anything bigger and a permanent RAM disk should use ECC RAM. Bit errors will corrupt the data on the volume over time, especially if you are overclocked.Quote:
Originally Posted by KELL5
Thankyou for the advice, much appreciated :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Speederlander
2x Compustocx 128GB MLC SSD (Raid 0, stripe size 128K) on ICH9R (DFI X38):
Write-back cache disabled (left) vs. enabled (right):
http://database.he-computer.de/Bilde.../SSDohneWB.jpghttp://database.he-computer.de/Bilde...h/SSDmitWB.jpg
http://database.he-computer.de/Bilde...ch/hdtuneR.jpg
Give them a real controller and use 4+ and your system will fly... very similar to OCZ core series (Samsung-based with crappy Jmicron) but I didn't experience any unusual lags yet :up:
Intel x-25m:
Random reads and writes on that thing?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mako88
you can't be serious? that's about how one drive should be performing.Quote:
Originally Posted by shanems3
what seagate drives? 7200.10/11/ES.2?
Perhaps a bit late... but here are my results.
Cheers
Areca 1680ix-12 and 10 Seagate 15k.5 SAS drives
:D
WOW Nizzen! :shocked:
That is the highest average read speed I have ever seen on striped mechanical or SSD drives! The only exception being a RAMdisk.
That is awesome. Good job.
I wonder if there any other raid cards besides the Areca 1680 that would allow that high of read or write speeds.
Tough act to follow, but...
my 4 ssds in RAID 0
http://www3.mediafire.com/imgbnc.php...7e58404e6g.jpg
3 x VelociRaptors in a Matrix 300GB slice
Does this look right? I thought SSD's were less volatile that this...[IMG]http://www3.mediafire.com/imgbnc.php...26c34d236g.jpg[/IMG]
they are if you don't have anything installed on them (i.e. OS / Programs) for benching or accessing them (i.e. AV software running), under these circumstances so are traditional hard disks except instead of a slightly wavy line you get a curve going from highest read to lowest on the far side instead.
I am using them as my OS/App drive. Although, HDTune is running from my E drive which is my storage VelociRaptor drive. :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by Levish
WD 640GB (16MB) in RAID 5 on a RR 3510 controller
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/e801ce3092.png
Who has more IOPS or 4k-results? :p:
Left = read - right = write
http://www.abload.de/img/hc_471n1hx.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/hc_473w4i0.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/hc_474xyon.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/hc_453f4qq.jpg
^ :D
http://img58.imageshack.us/img58/5453/readvf7.pnghttp://img67.imageshack.us/img67/2035/writedw5.png
they need to fix their write tests
after 64k the controller stays throttled @ max for 5+ minutes
Heres my main drive, WD 250GB Caviar SE 8MB (WD2500AAJS) (Slow boy) Q9550@3.6ghz Its way past due for a reformat, going on this format for about 2 years now... lol
http://i270.photobucket.com/albums/j...00AAJS-55R.png
Oh and heres my storage drive forgot about that one, little faster than my main, its a WD 1TB 16MB Cache (WD10EACS) same cpu/speed etc... Its got a fresh format as well.
http://i270.photobucket.com/albums/j...EACS-00D6B.png
@ Napalm
Which drives - Supertalent with Areca-Cache? (512k or 2GB?)
At write i see the typical write-deficiency of MLC. :(
Can you run read and write without cache, too? Please! ;)
@ F E A R
response here:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/Forums/...7&postcount=91
http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/130/512bgp6.png
http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/2899/80039142fy7.png
http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/1397/64kzx4.png
http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/6327/1mbtm4.png
http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/7008/randomzb6.png
My two drives for comparison.
WD Caviar 160GB IDE :shakes:
http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/l...b151/wd160.jpg
and my WD 74GB Raptor :)]
http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/l...wd74raptor.jpg
I have another 74GB Raptor, and me-thinks I will be trying some Raid setups soon...
Did I miss something or does that raptor seem a tad...off.Quote:
Originally Posted by sniperbob
That seems too low for 3x mtron 7500's. I have 2 and I get 240. I expect on #3 to have 360 no problem. They seem to scale up perfectly until you hit the limit of your controller.Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlantic2142
4 x Patriot Warp v2's on ARC-1220
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...ca128katto.jpg
2x 150GB VelociRaptor's RAID 0 - OS/App. Drive
http://i211.photobucket.com/albums/b...Tune200109.jpg
Intel Matrix - Maximus Extreme
supertalent 32gb sata mini pcie ssd @ asus eee pc900
http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/3392/900jj9.png
Boot & App Volume:
Mirror of Fujitsu MBA3147RC 15K SAS Drives
http://www.pcrpg.org/pics/misc/fujitsu15kmirror.png
Data Volume:
8x500GB WD & Samsung 7200RPM SATA in RAID-5 on Areca ARC-1220
(HDTune doesn't show the real capacity of 3160GB usable due to an issue with supporting 64-bit LBA in the program--as such, the true access time isn't shown either which is around 15ms)
http://www.pcrpg.org/pics/misc/newarray.png
3XWD 40GB in RAID 0 -128K stripes. With amd SB750 controller.
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y9/...boy/hdtack.jpg
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y9/esi-slowboy/1-8.png
Raid 0 results are all based on two drives.
OCZ core is single drive (performance was so bad I wasn't going to buy another one to see raid results).
All results are on OS based drives untweaked, apart from the OCZ drive, which was tweaked to improve performance.
http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/6540/pcmark053.png
http://img244.imageshack.us/img244/3527/random.pnghttp://img19.imageshack.us/img19/4117/read.png
NOTE: please dont take these numbers seriously dont want to make anyone cry :)
ahahah :D
What's up with your numbers? PCIe x8 doesn't even have remotely that much bandwidth.
VR 150 raid 0 on ICH10R
http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d1...ancedCache.png
@ NapalmV5
Config?
Their system is PhotoShop ;)
Areca ARC 1231 use pcie 8x. Pcie 1x = 500 MB/s , 500x8 = 4 GB/seg max.
Bench show >10 GB/s :ROTF:
You have not seen as jumping the line at the end, ? , muahah http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/5159/vengaya.gif
@ FEAR
lol come on you know my config :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Bean
Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
FYI: its 12GB/s max !!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Bean
:ROTF: photoshop? right! im gonna spend all my time punching in all those numbers/dots/graphs :rofl:
if you guys want more info check the storage subforum :rolleyes:
F1 500gb
http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/391/hdtunesamsungot8.jpg
Hitachi 640gb
http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/4...hitachihj0.jpg
Hitachi 750gb (8mb)
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/788/hdtunehitachi.jpg
Yes, but not what Ram do you use.Quote:
Originally Posted by NapalmV5
DDR2, DDR3? OC or not? ;)
No, it's really not. PCIe 1.x is 250MB/s per lane. Seeing as how all the Areca cards are PCIe 1.x x8, that means you're limited to ~2GB/s by the slot itself. 9GB/s average is simply impossible on that hardware and means one of the following:Quote:
Originally Posted by NapalmV5
- Benchmarks are screwing up (quite possible)
- You've got Windows setup to do insane caching, thus skewing true hardware performance greatly
- RTC slowdown
@ Particle
Napalm means 12GB/s. with MFT ;)
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=218669
Ok then. Let's just not try and pass this off as hard drive performance when it is RAM being used as a generous cache.
FYI: its not ram! it has nothing to do with pcie = xxxxMB/s :rolleyes: its done on the ssd!
those of you not enjoying the numbers hope you got a good rub-in/not taking the numbers for fun you really got dire issues
heres the NOTE: please dont take these numbers seriously dont want to make anyone cry :)
late purposely :D
@ FEAR - all the info is @ thread: giga ep45 extreme/ddr2/q9650 @ 4.5ghz
The data has to get to the SSD somehow, and if you're going through a controller then it very well does have to do with PCIe bandwidth.
Ram-Timings and Ram-Clock?Quote:
Originally Posted by NapalmV5
^ 600mhz @ default 5-5-5-15
why so interested ? :D
you wanna pin point why your 1261 cant catch my 1231 ? :D :D :D lol
just let me get 4x faster ssd..
Just setup a raid 6 array on a 3ware 9690Sa-8I with BBU and 8xSeagate 7200.12 500gb
Here are some benchies:
http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/6877/raidc.jpg
why?Quote:
Originally Posted by NapalmV5
MFT profits from the performance of desktop-ram
So, you can use slower SSDs than your´s. :D
I think on a Core i7-system you have the best performance (better cpu-ram linking)
12x transcend 32gb mlc on areca1231ml 2gb raid6
http://i631.photobucket.com/albums/u...1lus/100mb.jpg
Phenom X3 8450 @ Stock
2GB DDR2 PC800 @ 6-6-6-18
Geforce 9400GT
nForce 430 Chipset
2XWestern Digital 320GB SATAII Drives in RAID 0
Native Command Queuing not available.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...GBWD_RAID0.jpg
Velociraptor 150 RAID0 (AMD SB750)
http://i371.photobucket.com/albums/o.../raidbench.jpg
WD Caviar Black 500Gb
http://i371.photobucket.com/albums/o...aviarbench.jpg
Whoah raptors in raid 0 look really impressive. I'm putting them in raid 0 soon. :D
2x 300GB Velociraptors GFLS on ICH10R (2 Volumes)
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000 HDS721075KLA330 750GB (non-Raid)
OCZ Apex 120GB SSD (non-Raid)
Atto (Default) and (0.5 - 1024 "Neither")
HD Tune 2.55
HD Tune Pro 3.5 (Trial)
Atto Default on RAID C:, RAID D: and Deskstar/HD Tune 2.55 on RAID C:
http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/2...212avg6.th.jpg
Atto 0.5-1024 "Neither" on RAID C:, RAID D: and Deskstar/HD Tune 2.55 on RAID C:
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/3...210avg6.th.jpg
12 hrs later, fresh boot:
Atto Default on RAID C:, RAID D: and Apex/HD Tune Pro Random Access on RAID C: and Apex
http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/7...rovista.th.jpg
Atto 0.5-1024 "Neither" on RAID C:, RAID D: and Apex (put files on Apex)/HD Tune Pro Random Access on RAID C: and Apex
http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/3...rovista.th.jpg
HD Tune Pro Benchmark and Random Access on RAID C: and RAID D:
http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/9...umesupl.th.jpg
velocirapor 300gb
http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i1...666/hdtune.jpg
my heat. 4 intels x-25e's 32gb on a rocketraid 3520 controller partitioned with an onboard ramdisk setup for some o.s. apps...raid 0. 790i m/b,qx9650.xp.
WOW :)
hmm, this controller 3520 have pcie8x = 8x500MB per line = 4GB/seg, ok ?
you have 4x SSD read 250MB, RAID0 = 1GB/s
because reason does not reach up to 1GB/s your bench ? Max 860 in HDTune :(
single bench of x25-E show 250MB/s perfect:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=215670 post#7
http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/5...unereaddh1.jpg
heres the link for specs..its easier this way..Quote:
hmm, this controller 3520 have pcie8x = 8x500MB per line = 4GB/seg, ok
^ that just about seals the deal on getting x25es.. just waiting on supertalents ultradrive prices
mppc: thanks for the bench :up:
@ MPPC
MFTed???
win7 on raptors
yes, its NTFS.done on a fresh install so not alot of holes in the MFT..Quote:
@ MPPC
MFTed???
napalmv5: no problem. yeah u wont be dissapointed with the performance. there running in my gaming/benching rig..they have helped create a really snappy system.and the raid card is head and shoulders above nvidia fake raid.all instability is gone..Quote:
^ that just about seals the deal on getting x25es.. just waiting on supertalents ultradrive prices
mppc: thanks for the bench
wait thats mfted? lol @ f.e.a.r how did you pick up on it? apart from the higher burst
mfted should be higher than that no ?
oh well.. nonetheless
care to elaborate.its my understanding that ALL ntfs os's have mft file systems.Quote:
wait thats mfted? lol @ f.e.a.r how did you pick up on it? apart from the higher burst
mfted should be higher than that no ?
oh well.. nonetheless
f.e.a.r is referring to: http://www.xtremesystems.org/Forums/...d.php?t=218669
goodness f.e.a.r lay off mft for a bit.. not all results are mfted :rofl:
WOW,,i want one!!:shocked:and i dont fully understand it yet.for the performance its resonable..:up:Quote:
f.e.a.r is referring to: http://www.xtremesystems.org/Forums/...d.php?t=218669
goodness f.e.a.r lay off mft for a bit.. not all results are mfted
but to answer f.e.a.r.'s question now.no,,its not done with MFT's.
@ MPPC
Please try CrystalDiskMark (1000MB), HDtune 3.50 (Random Access) and FC-Test too ;)
http://xs137.xs.to/xs137/09100/paste...4_38_36291.png
2* WD 320GB drives that I bought 5 years ago. Still going strong, and still pwn in RAID0.
4 7200.10 ICH
http://i43.tinypic.com/28jlixu.jpg
http://i39.tinypic.com/2d9qw76.jpg
http://i41.tinypic.com/2cpqauf.jpg
Yes I run backups every night.
HP SAS 10K 146GB x 2 (RAID0) on P6T Deluxe
http://i430.photobucket.com/albums/q...gkol/i7sas.jpg
Hey Ekky
I just installed 2 15K Seagate 73g
Gb drives and my numbers are just slightly higher than yours. Are there any tuning parameters anywhere in the Marvell SAS raid?
Also HD Tune has a burst rate of only 85mb/s but HD Tack gives results similar to yours. Any ideas?
Thanks