i5-2500K/2600K batch number and o/c results

3049A330 *A2800 52X

3101A201 *A1564 53X

More multi then 4Es on UD7:(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dumo

3049A330 *A2800 52X

3101A201 *A1564 53X

More multi then 4Es on UD7:(

---

So you mean the UD7 is better in term of more multiplier (higher)?

How do you check max multi on these?

Does it matter where its assembled?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jcniest5

So you mean the UD7 is better in term of more multiplier (higher)?

---

No, its all the same with any P67 board when it comes to cpu multi wall.

4E on UD7 post code reader is the same as AE on MIVE reader

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Falkentyne

The VID is the "target" voltage shown in the BIOS, next to your "Auto" or "manual" voltage selection. This is not the "current voltage reading" actually going into the CPU, but the "target VID." The current actual vcore the CPU is using (power wise) will ALWAYS be lower than the VID, unless you are using loadline calibration (at high levels).

You can also see the VID by starting the computer into windows and using realtemp 3.67 (EIST/speedstep/C3/C6 must be disabled).

For example, in the BIOS, to the left of where you can choose your manual voltage, you will see a VID (might be labeled "Voltage" or just "Target").

If the VID is really 1.15v at 3.4 ghz, then the vcore in health monitoring should be almost 1.13v or lower, and in windows, if you run prime 95, it should be 1.0v or lower.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by l0ud_sil3nc3

If you don't turn off EIST, C1, C3 and C6 save settings and reboot then it shows low vid voltages like that, however once you boot back in to the bios you will see the true VID.

---

hmm let me know my vid, which one

http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/3669/defk.jpg

(EIST/speedstep/C3/C6 must be disabled). ----> Done

LLC Auto = 1212 v
LLC Enable = 1.236 v

4.2 GH on 1.224

http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/5306/69423361.jpg

Can you use realtemp 3.67 and check the VID? You can toggle the button on the top right in real temp. Realtemp usually reports accurate VID as long as the CPU is idle and no power saving is enabled. Plus the clocks are there too.

The screen shot has me confused. One has your cpu running at 3.5 ghz while coretemp reports 3.4 ghz. If you're at 3.5 ghz, then the VID will be higher than at 3.4 ghz.

With a CPU as good as yours, your VID should be no higher than 1.24v, and probably lower. However I've seen some cpu's with a low default VID at 3.4 ghz and a high VID at 5 ghz, and some with high VID (1.24+ is considered high) at 3.4 ghz but ironically, lower VID at 5 ghz (like 1.36v VID).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Falkentyne

Can you use realtemp 3.67 and check the VID? You can toggle the button on the top right in real temp. Realtemp usually reports accurate VID as long as the CPU is idle and no power saving is enabled. Plus the clocks are there too.

The screen shot has me confused. One has your cpu running at 3.5 ghz while coretemp reports 3.4 ghz. If you're at 3.5 ghz, then the VID will be higher than at 3.4 ghz.

With a CPU as good as yours, your VID should be no higher than 1.24v, and probably lower. However I've seen some cpu's with a low default VID at 3.4 ghz and a high VID at 5 ghz, and some with high VID (1.24+ is considered high) at 3.4 ghz but ironically, lower VID at 5 ghz (like 1.36v VID).

---

as u wish

http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/6624/idley.jpg

so vid 1.251---> BAD ones ?

Thanks, but can you do it at 3.4 ghz?
you're at 3.5 ghz. That's why your VID is so high.

Make sure you don't have turbo enabled in the BIOS, because it will boot you at +1 multiplier if all 4 cores are enabled.

Weekend fun:D...Binning 2600Ks

First...L047A901 *A3180 not even boot up @ 52X:(

Second cpu...

Finally:)

Another 3101A201 *A1983

http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/2...nshot023gs.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Falkentyne

Thanks, but can you do it at 3.4 ghz?
you're at 3.5 ghz. That's why your VID is so high.

Make sure you don't have turbo enabled in the BIOS, because it will boot you at +1 multiplier if all 4 cores are enabled.

---

Turbo OFF
http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/6654/offpu.jpg


4.8 GH @ 1.40v
http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/3170/83009425.jpg

Quote:

---

Second cpu...

Finally

Another 3101A201 *A1983

---

Nice! 57x with 4C8T!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LagunaX

Nice! 57x with 4C8T!

---

Thanks:D

All those 2600Ks or....900s of INTC

This cpu gotta work early...

http://img577.imageshack.us/img577/1...enshot025w.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gaul

Turbo OFF
http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/6654/offpu.jpg


4.8 GH @ 1.40v
http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/3170/83009425.jpg

---

Much better.
Your default VID is 1.2209.
Low VID=usually good clockers.

What vcore do you need for 5 ghz?

5th cpu.. -
5ghz linx stable on 1.336V

more to come.

http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/9743/56001.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Falkentyne

Much better.
Your default VID is 1.2209.
Low VID=usually good clockers.

What vcore do you need for 5 ghz?

---

:down: around 1.45v

What app to use to check for stock VID?

My Fatal1ty board gave the +1 working multiplier to the processor which was capable of 55 multi.
Maximus IV extreme + my 2600K = 5580max, 55 multi (SS)
Deluxe, Pro + my 2600K = 5560 max, 55 multi (SS)
MSI GD65 + my 2600K = ~~5300MHz max, 52 multi (SS)
Asrock Fatality + my 2600K= 5600MHz, 56 multi (Air cooled, Prolimatech Megahalems)

http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/2...litymax.th.jpg

Please don't look at the SPI run time etc. (I was just testing the 56 multi :))

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dumo

Weekend fun:D...Binning 2600Ks


First...L047A901 *A3180 not even boot up @ 52X:(

Second cpu...

Finally:)

Another 3101A201 *A1983

http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/2...nshot023gs.jpg

---

Congrats, nice chip!

You could build a house using all your 2600k retail boxes.

Thanks OC:up:..I can build a small benching shack probly with all those 2600Ks:D

Interesting personal observation from all these 2600Ks are

Most of >54Xs s/n last two digits are in between 80~99

A few cpu came with a square heatsink imprint which indicated that Intel did randomly test its sb chip (and mostly is a dud)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dumo

Thanks OC:up:..I can build a small benching shack probly with all those 2600Ks:D

Interesting personal observation from all these 2600Ks are

Most of >54Xs s/n last two digits are in between 80~99

A few cpu came with a square heatsink imprint which indicated that Intel did randomly test its sb chip (and mostly is a dud)

---

:eek::up:Awesome dude !!! i find good one to booting at X57 but it not booting win 7 on my ssd think its to hot :( batch #L044B676 and this is my 4th cpu

finally dumo!

its not a 5770 but hey 5720 can do :p. same as mine.

how did your 5770 chip die?

Someone on OCN just got a X59 bootable chip (it can actaully prime at X54 with PLL overvolt DISABLED)...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Asmola

I tried to find lowest voltage for 5GHz which will pass 5 rounds Linx with AVX..
Damn that stresses CPU a lot, stress voltage is 1.42v. Without AVX temps would be about 10c lower! :O

http://i10.aijaa.com/b/00639/7911779.png

---

My 2600K is not in the same league as this one of yours but I have to ask...

How do you get GFlops numbers of over 2x that of people like me??? (is it just because you don't run ht?)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OldChap

My 2600K is not in the same league as this one of yours but I have to ask...

How do you get GFlops numbers of over 2x that of people like me??? (is it just because you don't run ht?)

---

Download the new Linpack from Intel Website, and replace the old one in LinX with the new ones recently downloaded... and disable Hyper Threading.