Printable View
I got my mushies up with vdimm mod from x86 (5V line into the vddr). I played with it a bit last night...and umm...4.1V was enough (the mushies dont want to boot at that anymore and freezes if i adjust while already on).
well - this is definately the lowest ive ever seen
http://users.tpg.com.au/weigner/22.jpg
is this patched?
^the dothan doesnt have SSE3, so the patch wouldnt do anything...
congrats wwwww thats a WR on dothan, and iirc you tied the best A64 time...
whatever
i dont think its the dothan thats making it perform so well - ive seen a 3.0ghz dothan pull off 22sec with tccd - its more likely the ram - 289 @ 2-2-2-5; thats just awesome;
Quote:
Originally Posted by enduracell
what do you mean whatever? are you denouncing that he has a WR?
congratulate the man...
But yeah wwww the mem speed is just amazing, especially on that platform, very nice work!
:cheers:
3000+ Newcastle @ 2810mhz, score in sig. That's on an untweaked system. I'd really like 31 seconds and I think I'd be able to do it with a heavily tweaked windows 2k3 system.
Thanks snq for turning me on to a program that allowed me to be able to see the effects of changes in another excellent program, a64 tweaker. A HUGE advantage and time saver. My setup seems to run best 1:1. CBBID 0451 APMW tops out just over 2.7.
There is SSE2 patch for A64 and Northwood thou ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Revv23
SuperPI 1M time with 2.8GHz Dothan is nowhere near 22sec.
Thats what I thought too..... O know that wwwww not on phasechange so with better cooling say at 3gs would that do 19sec?........ not saying wwwww is fake but there's gotta be another explanation for the 22sec run....... and I dont think its 289fsb eitherQuote:
Originally Posted by The Stilt
I have a dothan, and if it's not patched then it's the slow motion effect (the windows timer may get effected too).
wwwww try using this version for reference purposes, it's should not be far off the current score. Just prove me wrong.
the superPi bench gets worse every day imo :rolleyes:
The voltage is not really high 4 benching. I used 1.82 on box 4 a while ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Sup3rman
about my sig http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ilies/wink.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by $0m#0n#
my 3500+ Winchester dows 38sec original.
and 31 clocked to 2.6 260*10
.....update :banana4: :banana4: :banana4:
:CTF: :
http://img149.exs.cx/img149/5808/252652xp.jpg
:toast:
[IMG]http://img224.exs.cx/img224/8581/32m2aa.jpg[/IMG] The 310p bios and 2/512 mu LII 3500.
Faster than HARDCORECLOCKER's FX @ 3362MHz?Quote:
Originally Posted by micdoc
Can't be m8 sorry.
:D Oh, look twice at his shot, it's an 32M screenie - 24min not sec........Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
:toast:
Quote:
Originally Posted by HARDCORECLOCKER
LOL, My bad but still, isn't 24minutes a bit too fast for a P4 at 4.4GHz?
My Newcastle at 2850MHz needs 27min 14 sec.
:D Only god knows mate - have no plan of INTEL at all.......... :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
Hehe... I got 24...minutes at 2.9GHz and 267fsb 1:1 :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
At 3.2...GHz I got 22minutes. Those screens were all on my old dead IBM hdd :(
The latest screenies I took with an app called Screengrabber (I don't remember exactly) the image quality is real crappy... some parts of letters are missing in superpi :lol:
Have to increase image quality for jpegs IMO ;)
:D Do You know Image Shack? Works like charme, here:Quote:
Originally Posted by SAE
http://imageshack.us/
:toast:
http://www.cool-cooler-the-coolest.d...rekord-tag.JPG
Click on the pic to get the highres version!
What do you think?Seems not to be a cherry FX like HCC's...
Frank, it's not a problem with hosting it :)Quote:
Originally Posted by HARDCORECLOCKER
It's a problem of saving it. But I just found out what the problem was... the pic got shrinked from 1600x1200 to 1024x768... that's where the quality got bad. :D