tWR 8 and tFAW 16 not possible bull?
Printable View
tWR 8 and tFAW 16 not possible bull?
Hey guys
@ C-N thanks man having a great time chipping away at my time,I'll keep trying
@ Splave I did try tFAW 16 and tWR 8 but it seems when I push things too tight my times become worse,also when I go tighter on tRFC 85 times get worse.This is only when I'm at the big 2700+ mhz tho,if I'm at lower Mhz it allows me to then go bit tighter.I'll keep trying them tho
l0ud_sil3nc3 - 6:17:500 - 104.2x48 - 1354.7MHz - 7-11-7-27-90-1 - Asrock Z77 OC Formula - G.Skill Flares 2000 c7/PSC - 2.0v - cpu LN2 (-65c) / memory LN2 (-94c)
http://i.imgur.com/aYGo5AT.png
Awesome run lOud, nice clocks that's the stuff
Now to just figure out the efficiency part:p:Quote:
Originally Posted by bullant
Had a play with this today 4x2Gb, no chance getting this stable.
http://s12.postimage.org/6ff8vrw65/image.png
not to be a d1ck but 1st place run does not meet the SS requirements :P
If you are referring to thisQuote:
Originally Posted by Splave
then you are correct, guess I never really noticed that:hehe:
only had an hour, so CPU on air. Not bad for 1300mhz only on the mems :P
http://i.imgur.com/6dZpSqa.jpg
seems new kit has potential, 2000 c6 pi
Will hook up SS tomorrow and try again
Managed to get the new KPC pot down to -120's Dimm temp :D about 50C colder then I could get the old revision down to.
http://i.imgur.com/Qpt7nus.jpg
^ beast as usual from you, the new cooler really is much better than prior designs at transferring the heat efficiently.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
Ehrm, any doubts with that result??Quote:
Originally Posted by l0ud_sil3nc3
None here, just saying for future screens it would be nice to see 2nd and 3rd and aida from your beastly runs;)Quote:
Originally Posted by angoholic
Very nice Splave
Hey guys any of you had a initial value of 4.232,I had this last night but crashed straight away
4.250 is the fastest I have seen, and even that seems crazy, but 4.232 is new to me:)Quote:
Originally Posted by bullant
Yeah it was the first one I've had,have seen a few 4.250.I did start it early, 480000000 when I got 4.232Quote:
Originally Posted by l0ud_sil3nc3
I notice alot of guys are running 600 maxmem,mite give this a go later
nope must be a 4 dimm speed boost lolQuote:
Originally Posted by bullant
bull you will want to stay higher maxmem with 8gb I think
Yeah thanks Splave I think your correct, tried it tonight at 600 and it puts it under to much stress,so I tried one bit higher @ 690 and came back @ much the same as my 670.Maxmem 670 was 6.656 and maxmem 690 was 6.657.Im still just using one file moving it from D -C-D then run,may need to try a new waza setupQuote:
Originally Posted by Splave
Higher maxmem than 700 would suck right?
I don't get how 4 dimms would benefit the score over two or even one...:confused:
I think its interleaving is the benefit
Article pretty interesting
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...42553238,d.eWU
I'm gonna have to give it a shot...I have a lot of psc sticks to try anyway but it just doesn't add up with what I had previously known or thought worked best.
It helps :D
Yes it helps but it will stress your imc more and may result in a lower Mhz due to your imc can't handle it.What I mean by this is if you can reach 2666Mhz with 2 dims stable,you may not reach the same speeds with four dims stable.Four dim speed may reduce to say 2600Mhz stable due to a weak imc,even at the little lower speed tho 4 dims may still be fasterQuote:
Originally Posted by Ivanlabrie
Yes, I'm aware of the imc limitations...I only have an fx8120 to test this stuff on atm. The imc is quite good but the mobo not so much (m5a88-v evo)
I'll be testing my psc stack with my new 3770k soon and post some results here.
Failed hard 4 dimms today, on ln2 couldnt even get 2600 7-11-7 and tight sec/thirds to go through 4 loops
Hey Splave,was this with OC formula?Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave