I am ashmed, i can get stable system (IBT, Prime, Linx) whit 1.28 Vcore and 3,6Ghz but in many games that i play, game crashes and says "**** stopped working" no bsod, no reset it just crashes to the game.
What can i do?
Printable View
I am ashmed, i can get stable system (IBT, Prime, Linx) whit 1.28 Vcore and 3,6Ghz but in many games that i play, game crashes and says "**** stopped working" no bsod, no reset it just crashes to the game.
What can i do?
Thanks :D Finally.Quote:
Originally Posted by Slovnaft
CPU-Z shows vcore at 1.200 and then goes to 1.208 on load.
I'd also memtest86 it, cpu stability isn't the only overclocking concern.Quote:
Originally Posted by carepolice
With the new 0605 Bios on P5E3 Premium I am now able to break my 495FSB wall. I am currently testing 507FSB and will post some results once I'm done. Here are some shots at 503-505FSB with memory running at 1617Mhz and 2016Mhz:
Hi guys :)
It's been a long time since I was last in here. Has anyone else managed to get a Q9450 Prime95 stable at 4ghz yet?
Your welcome :p: .Quote:
Originally Posted by Singh400
The only place I was going wrong were my GTL refs, they were complete out-of-the-normal. I could probably get the volts down a bit more. But if it ain't broke, don't fix it right?Quote:
Originally Posted by truehighroller
I am on my Q6600 right now and don't know where to start with it yet . :p:
Atleast you are getting somewhere right now, i think you can reach 3.7 or 3.8 with your cooling.Quote:
Originally Posted by lowtcell
Give it a try, my guess is that you need slightly more then 1.3 VCore in your bios and just leave the rest of the settings the same as now.
thats a graphics card related crash, lower you 4870 OCQuote:
Originally Posted by carepolice
Okey ill take a testQuote:
Originally Posted by SNiiPE_DoGG
do you guys recommend to upgrade from a Q6600 to an Q9550?
Or is it better to wait for the mainstream intel nehalem?
does nehalem support ddr2?
If its not about money get a E0 9550 DO NOT BUY A C1
no ddr2 for nehalem. IMO unless you go to q9650 your not gonna get the high clocks to make the jump worth it in the long run.Quote:
Originally Posted by mutang
Thanks, I'll stay with the Q6600,then will wait a bit longer to see if prices will drop for the Q9650.
Nah, I've tried. I can't boot in to windows above 440 FSB, it was the same with my Q6600. Anything above 430 FSB (even with low multi) gets squirrelly. At 425, I had random lockups even with 1.375 Vcore and 29 hours of prime.Quote:
Originally Posted by Earzz
is there anyone with Q9450 and Abit Ip 35 pro i need some gtl adjustments help :p:
Hard to tell since every chip is different, but I had my GTLs set to 72 at 3.8ghz for my Q9450 in the IP35 Pro.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vatos_locos
But it's a case of trial and error.
ok i just wanted to see how high we can go :p mine runs better with 80 @ 3.8 but i was thinking that it might is too high and i asked :)
ty :)
Dam just found this thread after posting a new one.
Hello crew, wanted to get some input/thoughts on these settings so far. Dont think i'm going to push it any further due to the fact 3.6 requires volts of 1.33 to get stable, as well as, push it to ~72C on the hottest core running IBT
CPU: Q9450 @ 3.4 ; MB: Asus P5E Deluxe
Vendetta 2 w/ Scythe DFS123812-2000 @ 1500rpm
G.SKILL 8GB (4 x 2GB) 1066 @ 850
CPU Ratio Setting: 8
FSB Freq: 425
PCIE Freq: 100
CPU Voltage: 1.26875 Bios (1.240 Idle,1.184 Load CPUz)
CPU PLL Voltage: 1.50 (Lowest setting on MB)
FSB Termination Voltage: 1.20 (Lowest setting on MB)
NB Voltage: 1.250 (Lowest setting on MB)
SB Voltage: 1.050 (Lowest setting on MB)
DRAM @ 850 1:1
DRAM Voltage: 1.80
DRAM Timing: Manual (5-5-5-15)
Prime95 Small FFT x4: 24hours stable
Prime95 Blend x2: 24 hours stable
IBT 50 runs at Maximum Stress stable
Real Temp 2.79.3
Idle after 30 minutes: 42.38.40.40 - 43.39.41.41
Max temp after 24hours Prime95 Small: 61.57.59.59 (90% of the time it held at 58.54.56.56)
Max temp after 4 hours IBT: 65.65.65.65 (first time all cores were the same) (Most of the time it was between 64.62.63.63 - 65.64.64.64)
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=423296
I don't see any problem in going to 3.6ghz at 1.33v and 72c. Tho you won't really notice the difference between 3.4ghz and 3.6ghz tbh.
Another my test with Prime95:
http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/7...t072ym7.th.jpg
Have you tried loweing your vcore for 3.4 a little more? I agree 3.6 is hard to achieve, alot more tricky than 3.4.Quote:
Originally Posted by 13.stuff
Re: sig. Nice OC mate, is that your 24/7? Or just for benchmark purposes?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cob
Honestly! Some people get all the good chips. Only can run my chip at 3.4 at that voltage. Damn you!Quote:
Originally Posted by angelreaper
She Folds 24/7 @ 3.9ghz and about 1.41v. The extra 100mhz for 4ghz isn't worth pushing so far over 1.4v.Quote:
Originally Posted by Singh400
She benchmarks at up to 4050mhz
http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/6645/4056x8wg9.jpg
:up:I run a Asus Striker2-NSE with the 790i , took a bit of play but had it running stable at just under 4gig , the temps were amazing low 30's on water. Scored 19854 in Futuremark '06 on 9800GTX in SLi config' much better chipset than the previous offering from Nvidia.Quote:
Originally Posted by Slovnaft