Printable View
just a note, when ACC is enabled either - or + Im getting a temp reading on all cores now, but before when it was enabled above +2, all I would get is 0 degrees
stable @ 1.45 volts, just ran AOD stability test 45 mins passed, will run OCCT later
http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/293...901apmwwa2.png
so does ACC seem to actually work now for the new phenoms?
OMFG :shocked: :clap::clap:Quote:
Originally Posted by Lastviking
You beat me to under 16s run :(
As I said before, to improve I need either new BIOS or new board.
Enjoy your top AIR spot as you and your chip truly deserve it :up:
You know I was so impressed with this that I posted the screen on another forum, only to have someone post this in return...Quote:
Originally Posted by Lightman
Now, i'm just not feeling it at all :cool:
Quote:
Got that with air cooling / heat pipe direct touch from Xigmatek, stable with 10 runs of IntelCpuBurn
intels have run pi better for some time now lol
never found out why yet....Quote:
Originally Posted by cdawall
8Mb vs 12Mb cache doesn't look that bad the L3 cache is way lower then core speed, by 1.3ghz
hhhhmmm
its just the way the process it its faster.Quote:
Originally Posted by demonkevy666
in other news my 720BE showed up as i was leaving for work will play with it some tonight
awesome hurryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyQuote:
Originally Posted by cdawall
This is for you cdawall :D
http://valid.canardpc.com:80/show_oc.php?id=507122
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/507122.png
niceQuote:
Originally Posted by chew*
I bet you answered his run was even more impressive? :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Smalltimer
Some people just don't get it, lol.
I found a HEX chart which I will use. In k10stat my NB voltage have been stuck at 1.175v so iam guessing that was my issue will try that later! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Sgt.McRuff
Just to let you know:
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/507421.png
:rolleyes::shocked:
Yes, go to 3D section for more info
Update of the 1M efficiency list: 168 records.
First time I've seen a 6MB Ph-II break 68k efficiency, by the way :)
http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s...sman-/list.png
Ahh so its backwards massman, lower is better?
I will work on my PI times.
My current results are useless with ram i'm using plus dimms 3/4 ( stupid heatsink block 1/2 )
Yeah: lower is better.
CPU freq Y -> Score X
CPU freq (Y+1) -> Score X
First setup needs less power for the same score, ergo the power is being used more efficient.
Btw, check out the 67.9k efficiency. That's what I was expecting from your 333/666 HTT/MEM runsas well :)
Yah, PI has never been my strong point. For what its worth i'm using OCZ golds 5-6-6-18 1066, I don't have any good benching sticks :(
I will work on it. I'll talk to dino22, he will whip me back into PI benching shape.
When did this happen???
http://3800z24.info/Phenom/untitled.JPG
Lets just wait until Intel brings another ES CPU which won't hit the market for another 3 months and break the record:clap:Quote:
Originally Posted by charged3800z24
stock voltageQuote:
Originally Posted by chew*
http://img.techpowerup.org/090214/Capture038.jpg
now i need to find a BIOS that actually supports the cpu
cdwall there is something wrong with your CPUz screen shot. Your cache is showing 3x for the lvl 1 and 2 cache where my 940 shows 4x. Do you have a core turned off?
its a 720BEQuote:
Originally Posted by fizur2002
its showing as a 940
so does mine, take a look at the specification line, THAT ID'S the Particular CPU. 940 is the package.....Quote:
Originally Posted by fizur2002
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=507122