are you serious?
I have the beta, it's nowhere near the hardware requirement of crysis
a 9800gtx can handle AOC
Printable View
My eyes stopped reading once I saw the link :D
After NDA Lift (17th for nvidia i think) :p:
regards
http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/5638/40920312ol2.png
POST AWAY NDA IS LIFTED!!! gtx 280 whopps 9800gx2 in Crysis and this is even on early drivers!! IMAGINE 3 of these babies in 3-way SLI! zomggggg... goodnesss :P Judging by the kind of FPS 98Gx2 get's in crysis i am guessing the settings was Veryhigh 1680x1050
One thing hit me tho, why couldn't nvidia make a card like this one year ago?
Allready postet. http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...postcount=1163
Oh sorry! You can zoom a picture... But why would you want a lesser version of the same graph? Dont get it...
he was pointing out crysis on the graph ... note the added black lines.
Any actual real results after 50 pages of bi*ching? :)
Hi,
try running the game at 2560x1600 or 1920x1200 set everything to maximum including all draw distances and set to 16xAF and 16xQAA.
Then go on one of the 24 man raids where you have tons of NPCs and particle effects flying around the screen.
Those settings and environment will be a slideshow on one 9800gtx.
Well if the cards really have NDA lifted now I think NVIDIA must have pretty much confidence in the cards.
16xQAA will bring pretty much any card to a slideshow on pretty much any game at high res, but who actually needs that? I personally can't tell 4xAA from 8x from 8xQ from 16x from 16xQ at 2560x1600 with a 9800GX2 (other than through the plummeting framerates as AA increases), and can barely tell 4x from 2x at that resolution. I am planning to get a GTX 280 (or two) due to the 9800GX2's memory bandwidth leading to terrible performance dropoff at high res, but I don't have any expectations of 16xQ suddenly becoming usable.