How I wish somebody would host it.......Did I ever tell you all you are the best bunch of overclockers ever. *Cough*send me the file
Printable View
How I wish somebody would host it.......Did I ever tell you all you are the best bunch of overclockers ever. *Cough*send me the file
We don't have it (by we, I mean those of us that aren't reviewers or ATi/nV employees).
:slap:
I also noticed the 7800gt score is with a 430/1000 speeds. That gives me hope for my 7800gt clocked at 500/1250 w/zalman cooler.
added my signature now too :) .
Such monstrous stupidity....so now Shader Model decides what score you get ? I'd rather they made it an all SM3.0 score...
How retarded can you get...
Perkam
wow, looks like this benchmark has no love for ATI, thats for sure...
Owners of Sm 2.0 cards would rather they got left out then face this stupidity...Quote:
Originally Posted by Kunaak
Perakm
Oh, is that how it works? So if your videocard supports SM3.0 you automatically get an advantage over the same videocard that only supports SM2.0.Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
Yup...which gives NO indication whatsoever of next generation graphics performance.Quote:
Originally Posted by shimq1
It seems that fears have been confirmed and that this is just a filler between 3dmark05 and 3dmark07....:(
Perkam
Damn, my dreams of my X800GTO2 beating my friends 7800GTX are over....sigh....:)Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
pfft that dream was over before it started :D
dual core CPUs .... 3d06 just doubles the CPU score !!! lol !!! :p:
Perkam
except for performance in ut2007.Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
anyways whatever happened to the scores from intel systems :confused: .
Intel Dual Core
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=65
Its so stupifying....because of lame attempt at cpu dependency...An X1800XT w/ Dual core proc would come equal to a GTX 512MB with a single core proc...
P4's get off ok...Both single core:
P4 @ 2.66ghz = 700 points in cpu score, A64 @ 2.55ghz = 100 points...so Intel users can rejoice ;) ... Intel dual core users...aka fugger...can get ready to take top spot ;)
:rofl: :eleph: :rofl: :eleph: :rofl: :eleph: :rofl: :eleph: :rofl: :eleph: :rofl: :eleph: :rofl: :eleph: :rofl: :eleph:
Pentium D @ scores almost 2000 points for CPU score !!! TWICE AS MUCH AS AN A64 at 2.5ghz !!!!!
:p:
Perkam
why so suprised at this?Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
isnt the same case in previous 3d marks?
take 3d03 for example dx7 card can only run GT1
SM3.0 benching is necessary now
it is an indication of the performance of card in the future (well at least in the near future b4 DX10 is released)
SM3.0 and SM2.0b are both Directx 9.0c ;) Hence my surprise...
Also, care to explain how an 820 Pentium D can possibly increase performance by 100% over an A64 in 3dmark ? Cpu score is a component of 3dmark, and is therefore a part of it....this benchmark is screwy to say the least.
Perkam
Dual core vs single...
hmmmmQuote:
Originally Posted by perkam
i hereby attached the formula of caculating the 3d06 scores
lets see how many weight are these cpu scores ;)
Quote:
The 3DMark Score is calculated using the following formula:
SM2.0 Score = 120 x 0.5 x (SM2 GT1 fps + SM2 GT2 fps)
HDR/SM3.0 Score = 100 x 0.5 x (SM3 GT1 fps + SM3 GT2 fps)
CPU Score = 2500 x Sqrt( CPU1 fps x CPU2 fps)
We'll define for clarity:
GS for SM3.0 hardware = 0.5 x (SM2S + HDRSM3S)
GS for SM2.0 hardware = 0.75 x SM2S
3DMark Score = 2.5 x 1.0/(( 1.7/GS + 0.3/CPU Score )/2)
i.e. 2.5 x weighted harmonic mean of GS and CPU Score.
GT1 fps means the average frame rate measured in SM2.0 graphics test 1. CPU fps means the frame rate measured in the CPU test.
wtf is up with this benchmark? It's not anywhere NEAR real worldQuote:
Originally Posted by perkam
X1800XT + AMD X2 @ 2.6ghz = 7800GT + Intel Pentium D @ 3.6ghz
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=65
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=34
:shakes:
In 3dmark06, interesting for a full run X1800XT doesn't run shader particals SM3.0 test http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=34Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
That's an interesting find eva....but it doesn't affect the score...
The Only Apples to Apples comparison that can be made is if we either look at ONLY the SM2.0 scores or ONLY the SM3.0 scores and compare across platforms...
I suspect they made the new tests and it turned out they killed most of todays cards so they added some additional stuff to the score that wasn't representative of anything close to 3d performance...
Perkam
methinks this benchie is just emulating how games released this year are going to perform :cool: .example:ut2007.
well it's multithreaded.Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
An FX-60 getting 1939 versus a Pentium D 820 at 3.5GHz getting 1829 sounds reasonable to me.
There's a difference between multi-threaded and illogically influenced by dual cores....this is the latter...I've seen and used programs that are SMP aware...this doesnt come close to even mimicking that software.
Perkam