don't talk yourself out of this, you made a mistake, its okay. it happens. nobody's arguing.
if you said 'can be' instead of 'is', then it would be okay. this way, its clear what were you implying. and this has nothing to do with grammar. ;)
regards
Printable View
don't talk yourself out of this, you made a mistake, its okay. it happens. nobody's arguing.
if you said 'can be' instead of 'is', then it would be okay. this way, its clear what were you implying. and this has nothing to do with grammar. ;)
regards
To test this theory I installed my brand-new DFI SLI-DR board. I originally bought this board when it first hit the scene, but I picked up a used Ultra-D board for $60 a little later. Since I had 30 days to return the used board, I've been running that the last 8 months or so. Still can't figure why the guy sold it.Quote:
Originally Posted by xgman
Using exact same components including FFs and a 3700+ San Diego, the SLI board maxes out virtually the same: 301-302 Memtest clean, 2.5-3-3-7. I managed to clear a SuperPI 32M run last night @ 300, reproducing my earlier efforts with the Ultra-D. I've attached both runs.
Now there are slight differences in the boards. The used board is a tad better as it can run 4xLDT at default VLDT; the SLI board needs a bump to 1.3 volts. I also had to relax one secondary timing to pass 32M on the SLI board. Otherwise the ram feels the same in Windows with both boards. It's possible the SLI board could use some burn-in time.
Probably got lucky though ;). I think I'll retire the used board and use it only for TCCD :thumbsup:. I almost killed it three times with damn cold boot issues with UTT (I won't mention names :D). I'm using the latest 623-3 BIOS on the SLI board.
The image on the left is the SLI board and the one on the right the Ultra-D board.