it peaks out at 999fps... macci and kingpin has 999 for some seconds!
Printable View
it peaks out at 999fps... macci and kingpin has 999 for some seconds!
well, he broke 44k :woot:
400 points to go. ATI/Intel ready to pounce on AMD/SLI :D
the counter may peak at 999fps but it still internally calculates more than that, I know because ive seen bugged scores of 1000+ fps
try some low resolution runs.. lets see 640x480x16 lol
That would give hom like 100k score or something like that. 999 avg fps for all runs.Quote:
Originally Posted by STEvil
we could test what GF4 said about the 1000fps barrier, though.
Find two settings that give 999fps constant in a test (other tests wont matter then) while one is obviously faster even though its still stuck at 999fps... if both come out the same score, then the limit is 999fps.
If the score changes then there isnt a 999fps limit.
Yeah, they are single sided. LL's are crazy eh? Definitelyy it's strongest test along with CL.Quote:
Originally Posted by charlie
Gotta be this weekend or week I guess before somebody like Opp or Shamino gets 7800 at 700+/1400+ in 2001 :D
When was the last time Intel was top, must have been the P4 EE on 875 ? Or was FX-53 out then on nforce3 ? My memory fails me ....
If only Intel had gone with Dothan type technology, the whole of the top of the Orb could have been massively different :(
Regards
Andy
there isnt a limit, just the counter but the fps can be alot more than 999, take 3dmark 2000 for example, the counter was 99 but the fps can be way more. We may break 1000fps in dragon low soon with x900 ;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by zakelwe
This article was from two years ago
An on-die memory controller on the P-M architecture...why didn't it hit market? Because obviously a Willie with RDRAM would kick its ass. :rolleyes: :brick:Quote:
As we mentioned before, Timna was to feature an integrated memory controller, but at the time it was on the drawing board Intel still had delusions of grandeur about RDRAM being the future of all memory technology by 2001.
when/if Intel puts an ondie in their pentium-m itll kick so much ass! But they are too fixated on their p4 crap :rolleyes:
Tha will change once they see the dothan @ 3.6 in #1 in both AM3 and 2001. That will change their minds. Kingpin, have charlie send over his redline @ 28x, that should help you break into the 46k range. Or OPB's 29x BH-5. Both of them should help.Quote:
Originally Posted by Geforce4ti4200
Oh and btw, Charlie in action at this very moment.
New x800xl WR's in a few moments
:slobber:
C
Holy $...
That's some serious 3d power :eek:
:thumbsup:
Well here's my best CPU clocks:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8617886
35K++
Stock card, no mods, stock cooler 459/607
Waiting for low cas memory... 12 x 257 1:1, 2-2-2 will give at least 200 points...
My CPU is not that great, even at -63C max benchable around 3100mHz.
What's your opinions on the scores, guys???
At 600/610 where do you think I'll be????
38K??
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...chmentid=32629
And here's me VS Tronik, current #1 Overall in X800XL class:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...chmentid=32630
C
You should really try win2k, even my dothan @ 2.87 and 9700 is beating that CH score.Quote:
Originally Posted by charlie
yeah, I will... I'm still reaching for the top end of the CPU!!Quote:
Originally Posted by alz85
Gautam thinks winxp is better for Dothan but if even kingpin uses win2k this speaks for itself ;)
It needs to be WinXP SP2. Try and explain how Macci hit 570 in LL at only 3.2 gigs with his memory ratioed at just 220MHz. I think that speaks for itself.Quote:
Originally Posted by Geforce4ti4200
If anyone doesn't believe me, please feel totally welcome to beat my lobbies and car high at 2.7 GHz:
http://home.comcast.net/~gautamb/fps.jpg
I wreck people 150MHz higher than me using Win2k no problem.
Won't be able to test them head to head for about a week.
Nice work man...You may be on to something for sure. I'll do some head to head comparison's with winxp sp2 and win2k. But remember, it's not all about lobbies and ch. Fully tweaked win2k may boost other scores slightly to still give overall better score than winxp. Even if only 100 points or less. I want to try it now to see for myself.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
For a compare, can you match my settings EXACTLY here and see what you get? This was on win2k mps tweak,200x13, 5-2-2-2 120-64-00-enabled, x800@ 519/560 with NO timings tweaks on card, just stock w/4.12 cats and all sliders set to left in d3d options. .:
http://pic8.picturetrail.com/VOL256/...6/97680669.jpg
And please re-run cl until you get one that is closest to mine for comparison sake. I can't remember if this run had bugged or not....but most likely it was :).
My hunch is that WinXP is slower in Car Low, maybe Car High-not sure yet. Lobbies it seems better, and nature oddly enough it seems worse. I didn't test the two myself, sure as hell want to, boy do I miss that P4C800 that I killed. :( Just 5 days or so, I can live, I can live. :p
I originally was planning to use Win2k as well, but Macci mentioned in his Dothan thread that WinXP had historically worked better on this board. The only other OS I tried was Win2k3, and I could never even get that OS to complete a run. :-/
Have you tried DRAM Latency Parameter 11, or does it hurt clocks too much? Might be worth a shot even given the speed hit.
Again, I'm sorry I haven't been able to and can't test head to head myself at this moment. :-/
And best of luck to ya as always. :D
Oh yeah, first thing i noticed when testing this hardware was 11 gave real nice boost to score, but unfortunately none of my ram likes it above 245 or so :(...though I havent tried it yet with the buffallo tech sticks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
Sorry about your p4c...I'll go install winxp sp2 now and test the 2 head to head to get a definitive answer. DId you use any sort of mps tweak with your xp installation?
The 11 is weird. At 01, I was able to get to 265 with 3.6v,then I put 11 on and I went down to like 248...but with ~3.5v, I can get around 260 there. Very strange, you might want to try fine tuning with the volts. Chance the 14x multi might actually work out best for you with the 11 timing. These puppies seem to respond very very favorably to tighter timings, perhaps more than higher speeds.
Yes it was MPS Uniprocessor tweaked, SP2 DX9. Didn't do much else other than killing services.
This might be some food for thought concerning the OS and timings. "Only" 3.3 gigs, 5:4 would put the memory at just 240MHz...and he's still got 569 LL.
I tried MPS UNI on Win2k and in windows, I couldn't install ANY programs with setup/Admin errors.
Can't I update to MPS UNI in windows...
Oh and I notices when I optimize for Car Low, I can gain about 20 fps, but when running Car Low first I can gain 60fps...
For me, I'll still take the 600fps Car Low score.
C