black viper regestry patch

ZMarre,

I'm still waiting for you to bench '01 to test the different settings you mentioned before (normal winxp, winxp & standard tweaks, winlite). Hopefully you'll get some time to give us some results. Why not try doing the same with win2k pro as most people use that to bench '01. It's been my experience that the OS tweaks never really benefitted my scores, but would like to see some real-world results. Seems like this always gets discussed but noone really ever goes to the work to make solid tested comparisons.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by teqguy

ZMarre, don't worry about it.

If you look at every single post KoolDrew and Westsideplaya have made, you'll see that all of their posts are single sentences that lack any real insight or depth to them.

So, if you're worried about anyone actually taking them seriously, I find it very unlikely.

I mean, come on, they're arguing against logic and tangible proof. :rolleyes:

---

i was saying DISABLING SERVICES HAS A POSITIVE EFFECT.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WeStSiDePLaYa

flaming edited by staff

---

This sort of talk belongs in a PM, not on open forums. "NO MORE" - please :nono:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BMORIN

ZMarre,

I'm still waiting for you to bench '01 to test the different settings you mentioned before (normal winxp, winxp & standard tweaks, winlite). Hopefully you'll get some time to give us some results. Why not try doing the same with win2k pro as most people use that to bench '01. It's been my experience that the OS tweaks never really benefitted my scores, but would like to see some real-world results. Seems like this always gets discussed but noone really ever goes to the work to make solid tested comparisons.

---

I will, no worry :) But I have exams ATM, so... (and guess what my exam monday is about: Operating Systems :D )

But I don't have a copy of win2k ATM, so I doubt I can bench with it as well
:( Will do my best to get my hands on some anyway :)

Stay tuned ;)

Oh and btw, because I'm studying this ATM, I'll try to get some time tomorrow to seek for some explanations in my 600page handbook about this stuff :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by teqguy

ZMarre, don't worry about it.

If you look at every single post KoolDrew and Westsideplaya have made, you'll see that all of their posts are single sentences that lack any real insight or depth to them.

So, if you're worried about anyone actually taking them seriously, I find it very unlikely.

I mean, come on, they're arguing against logic and tangible proof. :rolleyes:

---

We are discussing about disabling services and you start talking about the content of our posts.

How can anybody take you seriously when you have no idea how the Windows operating system handles memory at all. I will even quote you.

Quote:

---

Services are given a set minimum footprint that they rapidly expand far beyond, and once they expand to that, they don't shrink in usage.

---

Anybody who had any idea how the Windows operating system functions would know that is completely incorrect. You also said a kernel developer has no idea what he is talking about. :rolleyes:

Do yourself a favor and pick up a copy of "Windows Internals". You might actually learn a few things about how windows atually does function and realize you are in fact wrong.