Nah bro, but the F5 key is blank now instead of having "F5" on it lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Waxman
Printable View
Nah bro, but the F5 key is blank now instead of having "F5" on it lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Waxman
Usually, one of the first companies to have new releases form AMD is www.wave-computer.de.
They are retailers for the european continent and they are from germany.
Aren't A64's made in dresden and them shiped to the assembling facilities?
i thought i'd point this out. nothing really new, but it's still a good read if you're bored and impatient
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...64-venice.html
This core looks like it's going to be FANTASTIC. Overclocker's dream come true according to Xbitlabs.Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzimark
Opening line is that they are shipping today, but then later it's stated that they will begin ship sometime before the 15th...so which is it? lol
I sure hope the diego core is just as good.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikael
OMG!!!!!!!!! :slobber: Venice crushes winny by 2.4fps in car high with ras-cas 4 ram! Under ideal conditions, the gap may be even wider! :slobber: :p: I get about 10-12fps ch each 200MHz cpu clocks so Venice is an easy 50MHz faster than winny clock for clock at 2.4GHz! At higher clocks, the gap widens even more, especially with good ram and win2k! :slobber: I did notice Opp needed watercooling and insane 1.68v to hit 2.8GHz on the Venice so ill probably get 2.6 to 2.7GHz on my 3000+ Venice im buying but ill probably run 8x multi with VERY high fsb. 325x8=2.6GHz He mentioned Venice's ondie is 30MHz+ stronger! 322x9=2.9GHz which youd probably need a binned 3800+ Venice for that, no thanks, ill be happy with 325x8=2.6GHz for a $200 3000+ Venice instead of a $500 3800+ Venice.
Anyway itll be April 4 in a few hours but I expect 10-14 days for Venice to ship to retailers so we may not hear about Venice till then
Exactly what ram are you expecting to hit 325 on a ratio of 1:1?
TCCD can do it with some lax timings... well certain TCCD. I'm sure my pair could probably do it, but with something like 3-4-4-10 or so.
Geforce4ti4200 tends to speculate, and do so very unaccurately most of the time.
lol
play nice now........... :toast:
his speculation makes me happy though :banana:
oh man, gimiegimie!
It kinda seems like Monarch is going to get teh Venice really soon seeing as they lowered the price of the 3200+ retail Winchester to $166 :slobber: I live 10 minutes away from monarch so when Venice is released, im gonna order it and pick it up.
^^^
....BASTAGE!!!! :slap:
just j/k :toast:
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLHealthy4life
Xbit makes a number of mistakes in that review. Venice ships on April 4, San Diego on the 15th.
Also, they apparently used the non-SSE3 version of TMPGEnc, and then complain when they don't see an SSE3 improvement!
http://www.aceshardware.com/forums/r...6455&forumid=1
Well past midnight eastern... nothing on monarch yet =\
This is :bs:! They are toying with us...
About TMPGEnc 2.5 : Xbit never said that 2.5 supports SSE3. They only say that two of the encoding software benchmarks support SSE3 for sure, DivX and Mainconcept. Both did not show any improvemnt, though.Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzimark
So, for the most part, what we can take from that review is that Venice has a great OCing potential. But did not bring any significant improvemnts in clock-for-clock speed comparing to Winchester.
Benchmarkers and OCers are gonna like it, though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by babalouj
http://www.monarchcomputer.com/Merch...ory_Code=AMD64 :confused:
Sure you didnt look at the 754 NC?
Nah it was 167 shipped earlier, but back to 194 now. Still a bibox though not bpbox =\.
subscribed
^^^ hahaha. I haven't seen that video in a long time mata2974. It's hilarious!
Do you have the entire video file possibly?
sigh ........ im another one of you guys waiting for venice ..... already have a 2.7 ghz winnie but you know the thirst for ocing never ends ........ always trying to be bigger and better :D .
Well from reading the first Venice review, at least its faster than winny which is much faster than newcastle. I am worried about incompatabilities with some mobos, they were unable to run t1 in one of the dfi mobos. I will have to wait and see concerning this issue. Also slower Venice may be speed binned and not overclock so well, perhaps 2.5 to 2.7GHz making it a sidegrade for you ~2.6GHz winchester owners
It was only with the DFI NF4, so it is obviously bios related, maybe even related to the memory they used. Either way a bios update should fix that np.Quote:
Originally Posted by Geforce4ti4200
As for the speed binned. Seriously man, let the chip actually hit the market before you start your speculation, averaging, and advising. Seriously, about what 3 weeks ago or so you were spouting how great it would be and that there is no need to go out and buy a winchester, or FX 55/53, etc. Now you are having doubts. You have changed your mind and are making speculations based on what? The 4 reviews that have been done?
Can't wait either since I blew my 2.85ghz winnie up a few weeks ago (yest that was on air) :( Been cpuless since :confused2
Thats just Ace, he will always get too excited and speculate. And speculate more.
Anyway, catching that Xbit review, Venice rocks.
Compared side by side against the Clawhammer 4000+, the Venice... with half the cache... is faster in UT2004 and Farcry, all encoding apps, and Sciencemark.
Thats impressive to me. In Quake 3, its 33 FPS higher than its Newcastle equivalent.
Building my next rig around a Venice 3800+, so I can hardly wait for them to hit shelves.