Ram frequency record --> 400 1:1?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by craig588

The people that don't like suicide shots are mad because they can't do them.

---

jealous?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by craig588

The people that don't like suicide shots are mad because they can't do them.

---

:D Huhu - hard stuff here, hope bachus won't read this........ :p:

:toast:

Wise you are EMC2 :toast:

Peace Rabbi_NZ :toast:

Wow, just read this whole thread, which was like 3 pages of arguing :rolleyes: . Great results cpulloverclock, and dont listen to what they say. Its an accomplishment none the less.

Actually, people who do suicide shots do them because they can't do anythign else in the first place. Your logic is just flawed. :stick:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rabbi_NZ

Wise you are EMC2 :toast:

---

indeed... :toast:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by iddqd

Actually, people who do suicide shots do them because they can't do anythign else in the first place. Your logic is just flawed. :stick:

---

Depends on the suicide shot, say its a suicide shot of a Winchester at 2.2ghz with RAM at 220mhz, yeah, thats not much. but if the Winchester is on air and doing 3.1ghz or something with RAM @ 370mhz or something, then it means more.

jjcom

Its interesting it can achieve this high

But then, benchies would be nice to see and compare

I hope he can at least run a few benches

1T and 3000+


http://www.biwa.ne.jp/~yok/KIROKU-GAZOU/E-MR-8463.png

YAY benchies :)

Nicely done, killer Mhz on those DIMMs :toast:

yeah it's 2T and crummy timings , but it's still an achievement !

I don't care if it's not stable , or slow. That's not the point, here. He's just going for the max MHZ.

Personally , I like my overclocks rock stable (prime95 for 8hours at least)
I just cannot live with the idea my system might give errors/BSOD's.

Bandwidth doesn't impress. Care to measure the latency?