Official S754 vs. S939 A64 Thread

Quote:

---

Originally posted by OC Detective
I thought the latest 754's mobos were designed to 1600MTps HTT whereas the latest 939's mobos were designed to 2000MTps HTT?

---

He booms a lot but doesn't do much thinking apparently. It is true that advertisers are claiming that there is a difference between the HTT on the S754 and S939 motherboards. This is just another gimmick they use to justify the inflated S939 prices.

The truth is 5x LDT (1000 HT / 2000MTs) is available on all NF3 250 Pro chipset motherboards, not just S939. The K8NS Pro has 5x LDT as does most of the new motherboards.

The funny thing is that it doesn't mean a thing right now because it is not even close to being utilized. Some day it might be a factor (the max speed of the HTT) but right now it means nothing. Most people turn the LDT multi down to 3x, 2.5x or even 2x to get more stability during overclocking sessions.

Heboomsalot makes a career out of reading BS on review sites and then reporting it to us as if it is his own 1st hand knowledge. Not sure why he feels like he has to do this. I think he's a nice guy really. Just a bit on the needy side.;)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by iboomalot
ocmyface

CH has a single channel ram and slower HT thus thats a hinder which is compensated by more cache.

---

Yeah it slowed OPP down so much he had to get the #1 score in the world on one. On a 3700+. Hmmmmmm...he had 2 FX-53's, a 3500+ and 2 3800+ chips, all S939, yet he chose to break the record with the "slower HT hinder" that needs to "compensate by more cache". But doesn't the FX-53 have BOTH 1MB cache AND dual channel? Wow, the FX-53 must REALLY be compensating for something bad, right? Cause that's the reason the S754 has 1MB. Or could it be that they ALWAYS HAD 1MB UNTIL AMD BECAME CHEAP GREEDY BA$TARD$$$$$$$$$$$$!
;)

lets keep the voting going.

hard to believe only 83 people on this board have voted

http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/30s2680.JPG

Just a little 3500+ performance.
under 2K3 server it would be 2660 about.
I thought of having a problem with my BH5 and I am almost on have tested boot with 230 as pkrew said to to me , therefore I lend them to a friend. Later he return them to me , i retest them with 230fsb at boot ....and it works !!! I make superpi at 273 1:1 with 3,75vddr
i don't understand all, but I'm so happy , thanks pkrew for this tweak !!! ;)

Of course the DC chips do some things well (as long as they don't have to process large amounts of data or talk to the busses too much). I don't think anybody takes the position that Newcastles with DC can't do anything better than the ClawHammer with SC. That would be a stupid thing. However, when it comes to everyday applications (you know, where the CPU has to actually move some data AND do some internal processing as well, like in videogames and other realworld apps, or running benches that test more than CPU internals) Newcastles don't do well at all against the ClawHammer (or any other 1MB L2 chip).

storm even in cache intensive games such as doom 3 the Clawhammers do slightly better and in everyday applications the CH wins a couple NC wins some.

I'd say in doom 3 the 3500+ only being down 9/10ths of a frame rate compared to the 3400+ means the NC is doing well especially toating the mighty P4 EE. oh ya the EE has 2MB L2 :D
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
kinda wondering what mobo you were using? Nice score by the way misteroadster.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by iboomalot
storm even in cache intensive games such as doom 3 the Clawhammers do slightly better and in everyday applications the CH wins a couple NC wins some.

I'd say in doom 3 the 3500+ only being down 9/10ths of a frame rate compared to the 3400+ means the NC is doing well especially toating the mighty P4 EE. oh ya the EE has 2MB L2 :D
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
kinda wondering what mobo you were using? Nice score by the way misteroadster.

---

He's using the Gigabyte K8NSNXP-939. You want one? I have one I'm thinking of selling. I was keeping it just in case I wanted to mess with it but I like the Asus so much I don't think I ever will.

I don't like them, but for overclocking they're better than the A8V in most cases (provided you do a bunch of vmods). The stock volts suck.

might have to pick up a DFI mobo if it does as hyped/tested, and couple that with 2 sticks of BH5 and some OCZ help and see what my 3500+ can do :D

me , i like to play with my 3500+ and my Gigabyte, it's a funny toy :
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/276.JPG
yes , i know, i play with fire , i like that :rolleyes:

What do you think about this 2730 Mhz bench ?
If i could have 11X273 no doubt i will have 33K easily with these poor VC frequency.
34-35K or more with 640/640 ?
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/3DM273.JPG

Glad you got that cooking. Very impressive my friend:toast:

hello my friend ;) thanks man :toast:
Storm , as you can see you re wrong when you said than newcastle can't figure in front page.
it's proven now :smileysex
Sorry i can't do it with this poor 3500+ he don't give me more than 2830 3D benchable.
:banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:ing 150 mhz

My pleasure, just happy to see that ram really rolling for ya, got me jealous

your max 3D FSB is lower ? ok 271 , lol , just a very little difference. :)
I just need a good 3500+ or 3800+.
Phil , can you try a run with same settings about, in single channel ? when you'd get the time for of course.
it will be a good compare. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by misteroadster
What do you think about this 2730 Mhz bench ?
If i could have 11X273 no doubt i will have 34K easily with these poor VC frequency.
35K or more with 640/640 ?

---

Nice job misteroadster.:thumbsup:

You should understand though that if I ran those clocks on my FX-53 I would have scored in the neighborhood of 34-35k already, even at only 2730MHz.

No disrespect intended but you couldn't hit 35k on a Newcastle no matter WHAT you did. And I haven't seen a Newcastle on the front page yet. So far you're about 2600 points short, and it's only going to get worse as more people get cooling for their ClawHammers.

Still, a great job! I wish I could hit those mem speeds on my A8V, but without a vmod it's about as likely as a Newcastle hitting the front page.;)

Storm forget your A8V, do the vio=vddr mod on your gigabyte , and you 'll be very happy.
As pkrew said , set your FSB at 230 in bios and boot (if you have ram problems past 210 mhz).
It work fine :)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by misteroadster
What do you think about this 2730 Mhz bench ?
If i could have 11X273 no doubt i will have 33K easily with these poor VC frequency.
34-35K or more with 640/640 ?

---

I wonder how i'll be doing on 3DM01 with ClawHammer @ that speeds,
with same VC / clocks and same HTT/LDT/Timings etc. settings? :eek:
BTW great job misteroadster!!

Thx mariachi :)
i had htt 4x
here's 3500+ 274X10 , X800pro@Xt 590/610 aircooled 1,62vgpu
31440 Pts ... more to come :)
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8059237

32377 pts
258x11 672/627

What temps are you getting on the CPU ???

sweet clocks on the card

and great job :up:

When i done that , i had 1,84v mbm -21° -22° cpu idle.
1,73 Vgpu
under Xp.
Thx for the congrats my friend :) :toast:

If i could have a good newcastle, i will be on the front i'm sure. Perhaps i could with this one, but i don't want to explode my new lovely X800@XT (just pencil modded) for the moment.

Edit : no i couldn't with this one :(
34230 to have the front now :mad:

I thought your temps were in the -40 to -50 range.

very nice score without direct die cooling. Too bad you can't get to 273 * 11 that would get you on or closer to the front page.

either way sweet setup and damn fast IMO
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
lol 35K on a NC won't happen. Very nice comment Storm since you are still 1,200 points short yourself with a FX chip.

I guess a $350.00 a64 3500+ has to be in the top 12 of the world before you consider it a nice gaming chip. :rolleyes:

I would put money a 3500+ would hit front page with direct die cooling and good cooling on the card.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by StormPC
Newcastle=Crap for 3DMark and gaming.

---

seems like 32,000+ is pretty good score for a crappy cpu for 3Dmark and gaming. :wave:

I think we must test a 3400+ claw before we jump to conclusions..

Great score with that "crappy and weak" cpu!

Quote:

---

Originally posted by OC Detective
I think the upper 33's is beyond likelihood but a score that matches a good 3700+ would be a result in itself!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by StormPC
Well I think the lower 32's are beyond likelihood.

The difference between what I think and what you think is that I am in the top 10-20 benchers in the world and you are not.

---

Everyone pay attention PLEASE...


StormPC is no longer here to speak for himself. Since that is the case I think commenting about his opinions is unnecessary. Please stop bashing him and his opinions, lets all just get back to exchanging information and have a good time.