so intense, im loving it! :D congrats macci, on taking the lead... CMON OPP MAKE AMD FIRST TO HIT THE 10K BARRIER.
Printable View
so intense, im loving it! :D congrats macci, on taking the lead... CMON OPP MAKE AMD FIRST TO HIT THE 10K BARRIER.
Why is none of them using a 5900/5950u with Vmods and some exotic cooling?
I thought these cards did even better than the 9800XT in '03?
Or am i mistaken?
What's the drivers Futuremark approve for the 5950 ultra's?Quote:
Originally posted by Zeus
Why is none of them using a 5900/5950u with Vmods and some exotic cooling?
I thought these cards did even better than the 9800XT in '03?
Or am i mistaken?
I think they're still 52.16 iirc.
/me thinks you're mistaken:D
Sorry, i'm not really into 2003, but what's wrong with the 52.16 drivers then?
Damn school, i wanna stay up and see what happens.
sms me on 04230.... naaaah.
Off Topic: The 52.16 drivers have had their 3DMark03 enhancements taken from them in the updated version 3.40.Quote:
Originally posted by Zeus
Sorry, i'm not really into 2003, but what's wrong with the 52.16 drivers then?
The drivers after them have those enhancements re-instated which Futuremark are calling "cheats".
In other words, Futuremark just couldn't be stuffed releasing an update everytime nVidia release a driver update.
Whereas ATI have followed Futuremarks request of not "cheating", that's why ATI's drivers from 3.9-4.2 are support/approved.
Not really into 3DMark03 either, just remember seeing some websites posting results for 2003 with 53.-- forceware being asked to take them down or re-test them with Futuremark approved drivers....
Seems like nVidia can't help themselves, gotta be no#1 no matter what.
On Topic: I can see 10K being taken down within the next week.
/ponders why Oppainter hasn't used Cat 4.2's yet.
/thinks that 4.2 is Opps's secret weapon to break 10k!
/thinks Macci can get those CPU clocks up to take the title for "first to 10K!"
/enough of thinking!!
Macci just needs a few hundred mhz's and hes there. But to be hoenst i'd rather see an amd cpu get there first.
AMD wont beat INTEL in 2k3 IMO. Ive watched the futuremark ORB for months and INTEL has always had a slight advantage there..
I look at my 3700 with a 9500 and cry, lol.
Come on macci you can do it bro :toast:
just a little bit more :)
it's not about Intel or AMD, it's about WinXP and Win2k. 3D'03 runs better WinXP and so does Intel.Quote:
Originally posted by kommando
Macci just needs a few hundred mhz's and hes there. But to be hoenst i'd rather see an amd cpu get there first.
Great scores guys:)
Sorry for going off topic but thanks for the info... :am:Quote:
Originally posted by Minnyboy
Off Topic: The 52.16 drivers have had their 3DMark03 enhancements taken from them in the updated version 3.40.
The drivers after them have those enhancements re-instated which Futuremark are calling "cheats".
In other words, Futuremark just couldn't be stuffed releasing an update everytime nVidia release a driver update.
Whereas ATI have followed Futuremarks request of not "cheating", that's why ATI's drivers from 3.9-4.2 are support/approved.
Not really into 3DMark03 either, just remember seeing some websites posting results for 2003 with 53.-- forceware being asked to take them down or re-test them with Futuremark approved drivers....
Seems like nVidia can't help themselves, gotta be no#1 no matter what.
On Topic: I can see 10K being taken down within the next week.
/ponders why Oppainter hasn't used Cat 4.2's yet.
/thinks that 4.2 is Opps's secret weapon to break 10k!
/thinks Macci can get those CPU clocks up to take the title for "first to 10K!"
/enough of thinking!!
IIRC macci was also the first to 10k in 01.....lets see if history can repeat itself. I think it can :D.
As he is making headway in 03, he should be doing 01 aswell. Improving his 01 score that is, or he could be just letting us all wait then out of the blue and good score comes. I doubt that it would beat the FX though, thats one hard ass s.o.b. :eek:
How come everyone isn't running WinXP then ?Quote:
Originally posted by QuadDamage
it's not about Intel or AMD, it's about WinXP and Win2k. 3D'03 runs better WinXP and so does Intel.
Great scores guys:)
I'm puzzled !
Regards
Andy
maybe cause the AMD does better with 2000.Quote:
Originally posted by zakelwe
How come everyone isn't running WinXP then ?
I'm puzzled !
Regards
Andy
i really think OPP should try the AMD a64 with XP on 3d03.
Quote:
Originally posted by Stang_Man
maybe cause the AMD does better with 2000.
i really think OPP should try the AMD a64 with XP on 3d03.
IF AMD does better on 2000 then it is about the cpu and not just the OS ......
maybe Quad is right and WINXP is faster for everything. Though most people run who run AMD also run Win 2k still on the front page.
Regards
Andy
The hunt is on again :D
34 to go at the moment..
:slobber: :eek:
Keep goin :toast:
:toast:Quote:
Originally posted by macci
The hunt is on again :D
34 to go at the moment..
You're not going stop just under again like your AMD64 3200 29999.999 score are you , just for Opp to nip in and bag it !.. that would be too much ..you'd explode! :D
Regards
Andy
33 to go :D
lol, poiint by point.Quote:
Originally posted by macci
33 to go :D
Currently with 2 laps to go, Macci is in a lead by 1min, Oppainter is 2nd place, with Fugger lurking close behind in 3rd. Who will win the XtremeSystem race! Macci & Fugger are using 32-bit engine, while Oppainter's machine is 32/64bit power! It will be a close finish. Macci & Fugger both using Cat 4.2s, while Oppainter's is running with Cat 4.1s.
Outstanding Macci:toast:
And they said that 10k couldn't be done with our current hardware.
Take down 10k my man,,, before I do it:D
OPP
:toast:Quote:
Originally posted by macci
33 to go :D