Yup, but it IS coming.
Printable View
Yup, but it IS coming.
^^ and lotsa DP!, everyone in this forum would surely think DP is a good thing!
New comparison then, assuming 2880 CCs:
Interestingly, the ratio between the boost and base clocks of the K6000 (1.13) is about twice as large as the difference in many other Kepler cards with boost. Maybe it's due to the lower base clock?Code:780 Ti (hypothetical)
K20X K6000 TITAN Prop. Half 225 W
CCs 2688 2880 2688 2880 2880 2880 2880
Core 732 797 837 911 874 857 804
GFLOPS 3935 4590 4500 5249 5035 4934 4630
Memory 5200 6000 6000 7228 6613 6794 6082
Bandwidth 208 288 288 347 317 326 292
TDP 235 225 250 239 244 225 225
GFLOPS/W 16.7 20.4 18.0 21.9 20.6 21.9 20.6
(Note that the M2070 has 3132 Mbps memory and the 6000 has 3000 Mbps memory.)
Personally Im still thinking that a fully enabled GK110 is hoping for too much. Im more of a conservative in regards to this. I would more expect the 780 Ti to get 1 of the 2 shader clusters that were disabled from the Titan enabled with higher clocks. Looking at what Ti cards have been in the past they have mostly been just another shader cluster with slightly different clocks. Now if it does release with all the chips shaders enabled and at the supposed $700 price point I will be overjoyed. But I wont leave myself open to be disappointed.
Is it asking too much......
http://i1281.photobucket.com/albums/...psf4422565.jpg
Let's see what [XC] Oj101 says about this :D
Wouldn't that be EXACTLY what I said? ;)
card from this Picture, can be easily 15 percents above Titan
But PedantOne says it's a Titan with 3 GB...a Titan has only 2688 cores. I guess I'll have to wait until the reviews :)
Btw the fillrates are wrong, they don't match the clocks. Which leads me to believe this screenshot is fake.
48*0.902 = 43.3 GPix/s, the picture says 45.2
240*0.902 = 216,5 GTex/s, the picture says 225.8
Memory bandwidth is also wrong. Very slightly, but still wrong:
384/8 * 7.008 GHz = 336.384 GB/s = 336.4 GB/s (rounded), the picture says 336.5 GB/s
i said, our sample here have more CUDAs then 780 GTX, but i never told exact number :) Lot of datas on that pictures is correct, for example ID, but some datas are faked
I'm not commenting on the clock speeds (I've never mentioned them), just the CUDA core count. I have this strange suspicion (probably unwarranted) that people are generating screens based on what's being said here :rofl:
Let's just hope power consumption doesn't go through the roof with this card. Is the GPU on the 780 Ti a GK110-400-A1 or B1 or even a GK180?
Is it the power consumption lower than Thermi part 2, AKA 290x? If these are the clocks of a stock card with just the regular fan, imagine the gtx lightnings. 780 Ti. 1050 normal clocks and 1150 boost clocks.
Look at the gtx 780 galaxy HOF edition and you will see b1 are already being used on some cards.
^ GTX 780 is GK110-300, Titan is GK110-400 ;)
The big Hawaii show was basically cut short by a simple pricedrop and launch of a Ti. Man.....
Hawaii could still do well and still do Nvidia alot of damage, if they get their stock situation sorted sorted out. And from the looks of its, they didn't even deliver that entire 8000 quantity BF4 editions, on Hardocp, new stock coming in are still coming with BF4 and that was as of yesterday. So that 8000 quantity was not just pre-order editions as people who ordered on wednesday were getting BF4 editions.
So much for 10's of thousands.
Mantle could be its saving grace, and 4K res performance, the 280x coming with 3Gb vs 770's 2 Gb. Apart from that not sure. nVidia played their cards for this generation well, keeping the monster under wraps. Goodness knows what Maxwell will bring to the table.
Will the current Titan water blocks, i.e, Titan XXL still be suitable with the Ti?