they dont know how to erase...LOL
Printable View
they dont know how to erase...LOL
I think its an ES so probably a 3.4Quote:
Originally posted by xDUCK
Indeed, this is quite a discovery... What is THG hiding?!
But the question is, why quietly delete it instead of censoring it (black box, etc)?Quote:
Originally posted by skate2snow
I think its an ES so probably a 3.4
skates - save the image to your hdd and open it with something that does .jpg's then blow it up to about the same size those are at.
why??(ive already did that)
Are you trying to say their screen shot is fake from toms??
Or that TOM, intel and asus are in cahoots, That's a shock!!!
Hmm whoever's gonna accuse, better get it right.
If it's True, Kyle @ [H] will have a field day, and forget his transgressions in the past.
Hmm wonder what's Toms forums are looking like about this. looked there once a year ago i couldnt take it!!!
Skate you go look for me!!! hehe:D
Maybe they started erasing it in the beginning, then later moved to the black-box method?
Didn't they get caught photochopping something before? Bad Tom, Bad!
edit 5+ ghz is a nice screenie... hope the article was good, i don't plan on giving tom any page hits.
They did originally have the black box on it.Quote:
Originally posted by xDUCK
But the question is, why quietly delete it instead of censoring it (black box, etc)?
It was there when I read the review.
They must have changed it.
Sovereinty - The place at question isnt near anywhere that had erasing and/or black-box done to it.
EDIT
The namestring was blacked out before...?
Nevermind you are talking about a different spot.
Yeah, just realized that.. my bad. *shuts up now*
:D
Did you know Mr Rogers. The guy that reads stories to kids with the long sleeve sweater WAS a Marine Core Sniper? His arms are covered in tattoo's. look at him now lol.Quote:
Originally posted by Kunaak
well yes, there are some problems inherent to THG.
like they have clear and obvious allegences to intel,asus and MSI.
so on the hardware front I don't trust them anymore then I'd trust a priest with prison tattoos to be a boy scout leader.
"Welcome to my neighborhood, little boys...no just relax a moment while I put one in your buddy's skull and by the time you hear the shot, the second shot will be cleaving you heart too. Have a nice day and think good thoughts"
LOL
Those guys suck. What they did (faking the article) was really low.
And they don't even master some basic photoshopping :)
It wasnt faked. They definitely hit 5ghz. Impressive for anyone, regardless if they got a cherry best-cut-ever 3.4 ES straight from intel :/
they've been caught cheating before so it's kinda hard to trust them now even if you watch a vid.
you think why they shot a video? cos otherwise no one would ever believe them if they posted just a couple of screenies. lol.
Well with all the ยงยงยงยง they had, cherry cpu, modded board, ln2, 8 pounds of elmer's thermal compound (which they used about 4 pounds of), and a team of 5 people, it would be damn embarassing if they DIDNT hit 5ghz.
no bench is weird and it's not the first timeQuote:
Originally posted by Sovereignty
It wasnt faked. They definitely hit 5ghz. Impressive for anyone, regardless if they got a cherry best-cut-ever 3.4 ES straight from intel :/
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/2003...es/5255mhz.gif isnt available (for the moment??) :rolleyes:
No screen-shot now... that's odd. :confused:
heh, why am i not surprised? but tom can't kill this thread.
that's the IE cache :D
You can find the screenshots on their German site. ;)
http://www.tomshardware.de/cpu/20031230/5ghz-11.html
Jupiler, can't get anything from that link?
Does it still work for you?
they did not really did hit the 5ghz. Lot's of evidence for that (read the whole thread)