That is AWESOME :D
My request for higher voltage and more cold was prompted by this.
Printable View
That is AWESOME :D
My request for higher voltage and more cold was prompted by this.
Yes, Master/Guru/PurelyAwesome. Voltage was to get lower timings more stable, not to increase frequency.Quote:
Originally Posted by chew*
nice one chew, now with a 965 ;)
I think the thuban has a far better imc if you ask me, i did run unganged at 999 but 1m maximum , even 8m wasn't possible and gave me a error. 1003 always give me a error of reboot and i'm at the 0702 bios now.
The board needs memory voltage set above 1.66 , lower it become worse, if the memory needs it or not. Maybe with some old ddr3 sticks running 2,3v would be great but i don't have them anymore.
Nice Chew!
Certainly not ;) A week ago Mr Coolaler did 2200 MHz - of course unganged and @1.65V :yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by chew*
Look at post #5:
http://www.ocxtreme.org/forumenus/showthread.php?t=5848
My question is do all thubans do this Chew* ?
My early sample apparently does not like it at all :D Also 4ghz at your volts mine doesn't even want to post in windows sub 1.4Vcore at 4ghz...
Gary also had to go through a few samples and finally found a good retail for the 1000mhz setup...
My GTX2 kit might not be the best either on AMD, needing 1.72Vdimm in bios to pass Memtest test 5 +1980Mhz (all the other tests are flawless)... at eg 1.65 my whole screen turns red in a flash... (while on X58 we can reach 2100mhz C7 at 1.65 lol) Massman used the same kit for his tests (might explain the higher voltage needed)
it is gskill flare 2000 cas7 :yepp: isn't it?? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by cezar
yah won't work. thus the advice. already tried.Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
You seem to be confused.......1m......LOL and lol at timings.Quote:
Originally Posted by cezar
I can 1m at well over 2200 same timings.
Leeg if you know me by now I don't use "samples" I use retails.....I refused to do event with "samples" mine were week 1015 retails. To answer your question I grabbed a chip out of my tray and started playingQuote:
Originally Posted by Leeghoofd
Of course lol at timings :) And of course you can do better :)Quote:
Originally Posted by chew*
I'm not confused - you just didn't see my ";)" emoticon ;)
But never mind :) cheers
Here's that useless and misleading 1m ram record.........:rolleyes:
Look ma no cas 10.
http://chew.ln2cooling.com/Corsair%20GTX2/thuban/1.jpg
:rofl: I was just going to say something until this post went up. :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by chew*
Where did we find you again?:rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by chew*
a bit OT, how good is 1015 week Chew? Can it 4100+ air stable?
Haven't gotten that far yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by FlanK3r
Still getting my lab back together after trip.
Have reviews to knock out.
Then I need to rebench as I was being very conservative at event seeing as that was my first time ever on ln2 on that particular board so I was playing it safe.
And to add to all that msimax is up here benching today.
I know Brian that you use retails samples, mine is an early retail sample from AMD (so not an ES), but at least you got access maybe to a few cpu's... there probably will be cpu's with better binned IMC's for sure... if yours all do 1000mhz I'm feeling pretty dumb...Quote:
Originally Posted by chew*
Though got some good info back from Asus support about some issues with the CH IV...
Let's keep hammering...
What's the Vram chew?Quote:
Originally Posted by chew*
This is awesome!! :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by chew*
Nice work:up:
My money says very close to 1.65v.
is the first letter of batch A? if so pre release, reviewers sample / ES ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeghoofd
To answer question this is second chip i have tried and second chip that was a cakewalk.
nice ramspeed chew ...well done! , but what do you think of the efficienty of the board? even with high ramspeed the ch4 can't keep up with the 790fx, you're running 1100 ram and still "only" 68500 efficienty. I think that is not too good, imagine 1100mhz ram on a ch3 will do.....:eek:
tested 32m today between a ch4 and ch3 with a x2 and same settings/hardware /os /tweaks and i was not very pleased about it. :( no 32m low clock challenge for this board.:mad:
effeciency was no concern or that would not have been run in win7 ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Rol-Co
stability is my only concern currently, win7 is harsher.
Test effeciency later i guess.
Did you find the reason/solution for this discrepancy? I am seeing the same issue on the M489TD Pro 0901 BIOS too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lightman
AOD has bugged voltage readouts on most boards. Experiencing this with most giga boards right now... Does the Pro support TurboV software ?
You're probably right, just installed TurboV and it reflects the BIOS setting exactly.
Thx for the insight. :)