Weird, I had a higher whetstone @ 3.2Ghz/2600 NB/1333 ram cas6
Printable View
Weird, I had a higher whetstone @ 3.2Ghz/2600 NB/1333 ram cas6
I didn't change anything at NB or RAM. In additon I had all my normal stuff running in the background as that's just the environment BOINC will run in.
yeah it is, but I think most people run the benchmark on a clean system just like any other to remove variables, maybe give it a shot with a restart
It is almost impossible to figure out the actual PPD from WCG stats. If I add up the separate points generated it is over 20K but they are calculating PPH and PPD from when I 1st registered not when started crunching.
Just take the Granted Points from some results, divide them by the time you needed for them to complete and then multiply them with 24 x 6 x 7. (24 hours, 6 cores, 1boinc = 7 WCG)
If you click "My statistics" then click "Device Statistics" and select the right computer from the list, it should give you a point total per day for the last 14 days. You can have it show up to the last 365 days if u select it at the bottem. Hope this helps.Quote:
Originally Posted by PaganII
I took my Uptime and subtracted 7 hrs (last update) and divided Points generated by that.
638 PPH
15,073 PPD
I can't use their time. They think I started 5 days ago.
Wouldn't just updating from Ubuntu 9.10 to 10.4 give him the newer kernel without having to figure out a manual compile? Have you run 'top' to make sure all 6 cores are at 100% (reads as 99)? Anyone tested with a kill-a-watt to see how the X6 draws in WCG compared to a 920/930?
Yeah I did check that with top Paladin they were all loaded. As for the ubuntu 10.4 update, If D_As' offer still stands I'd like some help learning how to compile a custom kernel anyway. I had thought about just updating to 10.4 . I may yet when I go back to overclock this rig. For now I just want it on for supercomputer week.
Also, I manually inserted the k10temp module and the temp reading seems to be working properly now. its running ~ 34c loaded.
I havent put in a full day with my 1090T yet as Ive played around with overclocking it and now undervolting it but so far it looks to be good for well over 20k at stock.
Its only been on for 3 days none fulltime thus far and Ive had a couple of task go to the invalid bin :( from my overclocking.
Too weak of a motherboard to oc on, Biostar TA785G3, so Ive undervolted it to 1.3v and the temps are at 40c on a Zerotherm BTF90.
Its on Win7x64 running Boinc 64bit. At the end of today I should have some good numbers from it.
Heres some very inconclusive results also..
as you can see the Quad @ 3.6 has generated double the points in double the time..
*No errors or invalids have been reported in my stats, is that the only place I can check if reuslts have been dumped?
http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/9462/92239757.png
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
How do i translate this into BOINC pts? just x 6 or whatever it is?
Don't worry, results take time to validate. Plus, it's only been a day. Wait for about a week before averaging your points.Quote:
Originally Posted by mAJORD
Don
My X6 did 21,936 today, but yesterday it was running at 3.6Ghz until around 1600 PST. It's running at 3.2Ghz now.
http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/3...wcgresults.jpg
I'll keep checking it as the week progresses.
isn't that over 7 days? (sorry if that's a stupid Q, still noobed @ WCG and points)
No, that's just what it reported for today(5-2-2010) so its not a great indication of what this is gonna average. I'm just reporting it so interested people can see what it's doing point-wise.
Those are your totals for all each of your machines.
Why does the date say 2/05/10? Is that a Euro-Aussie version with the day first?
No, my daily total for all machines was 48,776. I got the 21,936 from the device statistics section which itemizes point contributions from each host. And the date looks right to me in the pic (5-2-2010)
Edit - Just realized you might be talking to mAJORD about the results, sorry Sierra
No problem.:) I've never saw the date that way with the day first on the Device Statistics page. Also, I made a correction to my earlier post. Those are the totals for each machine, not just daily. To find out what each machine did today you need to click on the device name.
Yep, that's where I got it. I'm hoping for your 23k estimate tomorrow :)
You divide WCG points by 7 to get an approximate BOINC points. Multiply BOINC points by 7 to get approximate WCG pointsQuote:
Originally Posted by mAJORD
Yep, aussie date format ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by sierra_bound
So i'm still confused..
Someguy's result is 21936 pts over 7 days of crunching = 3133 WCG pts / day?
No, the 21,936 is for today. The page you were showing are your totals for each machine, including today. To find out what your Phenom did today, you need to click on the device name for that machine. Another page will open up with similar columns, but only for that one computer.
No that's what it reported for today, the 2nd of may. The day before(the 1st of may) it returned 9k points, but that's because some work units needed to validate. 21,936 might be an anomaly, only time will tell. But it is not over 7 days, that is just for today, the 2nd, on the 1090T.
This might help you see it better, go to your "My Grid" page on WCG. On the left side of the screen you should see a "Device Statistics" button. When you click it, the page will show a list of all the devices currently returning work. Click the device that is your 1090T. It will go to a page which itemizes per day your WCG points returned.
doh.. sorry guys I confused Someguy1982's IMG as being the same page as the one i linked. :shakes:
thanks for clearing up.
mine's coming tomorrow, can't wait! but it'll be at least a day after that until i post results. oh did i mention, i cant wait! lol. it's been a while since i played with AMD