Thuban 1055T/1090T Previews, info and Reviews

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

04-25-2010, 12:35 PM
slaveondope

1 Attachment(s)

What are you intel boys raving about?
Have you seen this thread?
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...249434&page=16
04-25-2010, 12:37 PM
flippin_waffles

Quote:

Originally Posted by OhNoes!

I'm surprised you even said outperform, even though that is not always the case. The thing is there is a lot of generalization going on with regard to efficient thread # execution. A normal system at any given time is executing 10s, if not 100s of threads. If you want to talk about load, that is another story. All Intel has done with HT is designed a process that allows a core to execute 2 threads when the situation calls for it - it is simply ipc headroom that would otherwise go to waste due mostly to inefficient code - taking advantage of that just that. That is why HT is bad in efficiently coded apps. HT is therefore good for a world of badly coded apps. A core is a core, what can I say?

Actually I never really said intel's 8 threads outperform AMD's 6 threads. But that the comparison of threads is just as relevant as the comparison of cores. Its the relevance of the comparison you should try and focus on, if you wish to debate that post.
04-25-2010, 12:38 PM
RaV[666]

http://richierich1212.smugmug.com/ph...3_jHQrG-X2.jpg

I dont know bout any special sauce, but where is this whipping ?
Anyho.Seems like theyre on par.And 1055T costs 200$, and i know i know, you got a deal somewhere and you got 920 for the same.
But 1035T is going to be 179$.Without any special deals.
I can put it on mine 2,5 year old mobo.
If i would put it on a recent AM3 (1+ year old mbs) i have upgrade path to BD.
1366 is dead in the water, 1156 is too.AM3 is cheaper.

Wheres is this "bad" mojo coming from guys ? Amd hate or something ?
I just dont get it, these X6s seem to be fantastic offer for the price and there is no denying that.
04-25-2010, 12:45 PM
Hornet331

Quote:

Originally Posted by informal

TrueCrypt performance on Thuban is stellar. Head over here to see how it fares against same clocked i7 (decently faster is an understatement).

Wonder how long truecrypt will be a "valid" benchmark, cause with the upcoming version they gona add support for WNI and then its just gets ugly (for any cpu that is compared to a westmere core).
04-25-2010, 12:55 PM
RaV[666]

Quote:

Wonder how long truecrypt will be a "valid" benchmark, cause with the upcoming version they gona add support for WNI and then its just gets ugly (for any cpu that is compared to a westmere core).

Thats for sure, any HW based AES will be miles away.Its still gonna be valid to compare bloomfield/lynnfield and thuban tho.
And it seems like theyre the direct competitors.
04-25-2010, 01:03 PM
Riska

The 1090T at 5.8ghz on win7 64bit and no tweaks and nb at stock i can do Wprime 32 at 4.2 seconds on the new 890FX mobo i am not allowed to show you some thing because og NDA.
04-25-2010, 01:04 PM
OhNoes!

Quote:

Originally Posted by RaV[666]

I dont know bout any special sauce, but where is this whipping ?
Anyho.Seems like theyre on par.And 1055T costs 200$, and i know i know, you got a deal somewhere and you got 920 for the same.
But 1035T is going to be 179$.Without any special deals.
I can put it on mine 2,5 year old mobo.
If i would put it on a recent AM3 (1+ year old mbs) i have upgrade path to BD.
1366 is dead in the water, 1156 is too.AM3 is cheaper.

Wheres is this "bad" mojo coming from guys ? Amd hate or something ?
I just dont get it, these X6s seem to be fantastic offer for the price and there is no denying that.

Nobody is hating on AMD. Mr. Informal made some exaggerated remarks and I wanted to correct it. Is that hating AMD? Thubans are not bad, and allows AMD users to taste some of the performance of Core i7, given the right environment. Plus competition is a good thing. The only "bad mojo" in this thread is Infornmal working hard to distort the picture, as usual.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riska

The 1090T at 5.8ghz on win7 64bit and no tweaks and nb at stock i can do Wprime 32 at 4.2 seconds on the new 890FX mobo i am not allowed to show you some thing because og NDA.

That's quite some result, what cooling, air or water?
04-25-2010, 01:09 PM
Manicdan

how did this go from x6 reviews and info, to whats the best upgrade for my i7 9xx?
04-25-2010, 01:11 PM
RaV[666]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riska

The 1090T at 5.8ghz on win7 64bit and no tweaks and nb at stock i can do Wprime 32 at 4.2 seconds on the new 890FX mobo i am not allowed to show you some thing because og NDA.

Firstly, you broke the NDA when you just said how long it takes 1090T to do wprime.
Secondly, the chips are already available at retail here and there so dont be so uptight ;-).
And just register a diff nickname here and post the :banana::banana::banana::banana: out of this cpu :P.
Its not like theres some kind of NDA CIA out there ...

EDIT

Quote:

That's quite some result, what cooling, air or water?

That ironic remark is just mean :P
04-25-2010, 01:11 PM
Riska

Ln2 and the mobo is Asus crossair IV formula 890FX
04-25-2010, 01:17 PM
Riska

I respect my NDA and thats that!!!
04-25-2010, 01:20 PM
OhNoes!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riska

Ln2 and the mobo is Asus crossair IV formula 890FX

Thanks, I'm sure there's more in that chip. Give it some more volts and push it!
04-25-2010, 01:21 PM
radaja

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manicdan

how did this go from x6 reviews and info, to whats the best upgrade for my i7 9xx?

same way it always does.
someone compares AMD's latest cpu to intel's or the other way around.
then intel fans cry foul over which intel cpu should be compared to.
then AMD fans fight the intel fans about which intel cpu should be used.
then without fail,happens every time when people care too much for their
brand they lash out and defend them like they were married to AMD or Intel
things start to get idiotically out of control,to the point the tread is ruined.
04-25-2010, 01:30 PM
RaV[666]

Quote:

I respect my NDA and thats that!!!

Thats really nice and lovely of you toward this big soulless corporation :-).
Could you atleast give us info when NDA specifically ends ? Date / hour would be fantastic mate :).
04-25-2010, 02:32 PM
Xoulz

opos
04-25-2010, 03:00 PM
mstp2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by RaV[666]

snip

1366 is dead in the water

snip

Tell that to the wonderful pair of X5670s that I have running in some nice 2 year "old" ASUS P6T Mobos.
:D
04-25-2010, 03:20 PM
RaV[666]

Quote:

Originally Posted by mstp2009

Tell that to the wonderful pair of X5670s that I have running in some nice 2 year "old" ASUS P6T Mobos.
:D

I meant no future upgrade plan.Intel already announced next socket.
As for people who bought them when they launched, of course , they got decent run out of them, one process shrink and 4 to 6 cores.However whole package wasnt and isnt exactly cheap ;-).
04-25-2010, 03:38 PM
charged3800z24

Quote:

Originally Posted by alfaunits

Exactly my point.. 920 (or 930 for those who say 920 is EOL) whips PhIIx6.

@Rav, I have not upgraded anything but hard drives->SAS->SSD in more than 2 years. Literraly.

how does it whip it, I would call that a spanking. Plus, if you own a AM2+ or AM3 board, why would you go Intel? And for those who don't OC, AMD's x6 is going to do very well against those 920/930 chips.
04-25-2010, 03:48 PM
mstp2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by RaV[666]

However whole package wasnt and isnt exactly cheap ;-).

Well, people don't exactly come to XS to talk cheap. This is XtremeSystems afterall, not MediocreSystems.
04-25-2010, 03:51 PM
Hornet331

Quote:

Originally Posted by charged3800z24

how does it whip it, I would call that a spanking. Plus, if you own a AM2+ or AM3 board, why would you go Intel? And for those who don't OC, AMD's x6 is going to do very well against those 920/930 chips.

Yes everything true, but joe sixpack usually doesn't upgrade just the cpu, if the pc is to slow they buy a new one. Thats one of the reasons why I never understand why people always are crying so much about a socket change... plus most enthusiats change mobo anyway when they upgrade the cpu, due to certain feature that come with new boards.
04-25-2010, 04:00 PM
RaV[666]

Quote:

Well, people don't exactly come to XS to talk cheap. This is XtremeSystems afterall, not MediocreSystems.

Its not ,extremeleyxpensivesystemes too.And a system can be xtreme in so many ways.You can cool even a sempron for example with LN2.
And what this argument does in an new AMD cpu thread ? I mean really ? Just because i dont have the money to dump 1.5k$ on a cpu doesnt mean i am not enthusiast.

Quote:

Yes everything true, but joe sixpack usually doesn't upgrade just the cpu, if the pc is to slow they buy a new one. Thats one of the reasons why I never understand why people always are crying so much about a socket change... plus most enthusiats change mobo anyway when they upgrade the cpu, due to certain feature that come with new boards.

So ? Are we Joe Uninformed sixpack here or smthn ?And about mobo change, that depends, 890FX doesnt really give me anything besides SATA 6GBPS(which i dont need) to go for a new mobo.
I dont get your point totally, so its wrong that its AM2+ compatible ? It is not a good thing ? So its a bad thing ? How ?
04-25-2010, 04:22 PM
insurgent

Quote:

Originally Posted by RaV[666]

Its not ,extremeleyxpensivesystemes too.And a system can be xtreme in so many ways.You can cool even a sempron for example with LN2.
And what this argument does in an new AMD cpu thread ? I mean really ? Just because i dont have the money to dump 1.5k$ on a cpu doesnt mean i am not enthusiast.

So ? Are we Joe Uninformed sixpack here or smthn ?And about mobo change, that depends, 890FX doesnt really give me anything besides SATA 6GBPS(which i dont need) to go for a new mobo.
I dont get your point totally, so its wrong that its AM2+ compatible ? It is not a good thing ? So its a bad thing ? How ?

+1

I don't get why some people equate being extreme with expensive hardware. Ridiculous and very narrow-minded.
04-25-2010, 04:25 PM
JumpingJack

Quote:

Originally Posted by SEA

Don't forget:
Intel CPU uses 4 extra virtual cores to be on par. If hiperthreading would be off, it would be pretty much behind X6.

Yes, indeed. HT is an architectural feature to improve utilization of the pipeline/execution units, it does not change the overall results, 4 cores vs 6 cores, why would one turn something off that ups performance in most cases?
04-25-2010, 04:26 PM
Sly Fox

Quote:

Originally Posted by insurgent

+1

I don't get why some people equate being extreme with expensive hardware. Ridiculous and very narrow-minded.

Couldn't agree more. :up:

That's fine and dandy if people can afford the most expensive gear, I don't take any issue with that. But that doesn't mean everyone can.
04-25-2010, 05:02 PM
freeloader

Can everyone involved just quit the Intel vs AMD in this thread? It's a preview thread of processors from AMD. Let's keep it to that.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page