Always copied, never equalled :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Duh
:lsfight:
Printable View
Always copied, never equalled :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Duh
:lsfight:
2.0ghz 8 core sounds nice but I know it can't over clock :/
Ok guys, I've got this thing up and running on a test basis although my case isn't here yet. Currently running Windows Server 2008 R2 HPC Edition beta. I build these systems to do work and not really much for benchmarking, but if anyone has something they'd like to see run let me know.
what cpu's ? and gpu's if any?Quote:
Originally Posted by beaker7
cinebecnh 11.5
and well I'm betting some people would like to see a 3dmark06 or 05.
I was wonder if the new aod would work on these board with one 8 core cpu in them, I'm dreamer lol
there is only one benchamark i am interested in and thats wcg. Would you mind running it lets says for week just to see how it can do ?
Currently it looks like this:Quote:
Originally Posted by demonkevy666
4x Opteron 6174
16x Kingston KVR1333D3D4R9S DDR3 1333 CAS 9 ECC Ram
Supermicro H8QGi-F board
Using onboard G200 video for now.
Seagate 7200.12 1TB SATA drive
Cheapo DVD burner
I ran cinebench 11.5 last night but do not remember the score. I will run it again later today. I did find out though that it is limited to 32 cores. :mad:
I feel so sad for you. Only 32 cores.....:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by beaker7
Awesome set up you have. I'll take it off your hands because Cinebench only supports 32 cores. :up:
nice man, how bout any benches that can use all them cores! wprime? this one http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=202139 ? :banana::banana::banana::banana: i have no idea what benches use that many, if it wasnt for you i probably wouldnt find out for like 10 more years :p:
A screenshot of the rig with open case is all I ask, beaker7 :)
Cinebench 11.5 hitting 32 core limit...:(
http://files.me.com/dougmeyer/k7ittu
Try wPrime 32m and 1024m..
Don't forget to go into advanced settings and set threads to 32 as it's 2 by default..
This is strange. I ran wprime 2.0.3. It detected 48 cores and set the default threads to 48 and it ran in a paltry 16.567 seconds. I turned it down to 32 cores and it ran in 11 seconds. I turned it down to 16 and it ran in 8 seconds...Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
weird indeed... but nice work rig beaker
what kind of work your into???
Use wPrime 1.55..;)Quote:
Originally Posted by beaker7
did ythey really fail that badly when they moved to 2.0 from 1.55?Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
1.55 is the "accepted" version to use and gives a time thats comparable to the others..Quote:
Originally Posted by stangracin3
On his CB 11.5 score we can see the potential power here with that 19+ score.
Now think, thats just using 32 of his 48 cores, call it 70% for the sake of arguement.
My SR2 rig at 4350 got 21.55 points..
He's got a beast there..That's why I want to see wPrime..:D
to bad he cant overclockQuote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
talk about wet dreams.
He won't need to overclock.Quote:
Originally Posted by stangracin3
That machine will solve the riddles of the Universe before you take your next breath..:rofl:
With it set to 48 threads...Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
http://files.me.com/dougmeyer/0wskj9
With it set to 32 threads...
http://files.me.com/dougmeyer/zn2ask
With it set to 16 threads...
http://files.me.com/dougmeyer/puica1
what also interesting is that the 1024 times go the opposite direction.
it seems like for the 32m it cant "engage" all the cores fast enough
Interesting, I'd have thought better..
Your 1024m time isn't bad with 48 threads but the others are slower than I expected.
Honestly I expected to see you beat my 58.5s 1024m time.
could i use this for gaming.?
it should be able to play crysisQuote:
Originally Posted by fbmbirds
can we get a picture of the system?
I wouldn't.. cpu speed too slow.. Games want speed not power.Quote:
Originally Posted by fbmbirds
Interestingly WCG and its benchmark only seem to see 16 cores.