Can I have 1 for testing the lowest flow for my dual D5's pretty please? :P
~Bex
Printable View
Can I have 1 for testing the lowest flow for my dual D5's pretty please? :P
~Bex
you know i thought that in the product pic number 2 wold be best and in your results it was... i must have learnt something D= !! yay me =D
Got a question, which "plate" would you recommend for a system with 5 blocks + 2 radiators + 2x D5's? (for an i7)
So any real reviews of this around anywhere? I haven't heard to much about it since the launch
Dragon
You'll retest when you get the real stock plate, right? I was just curious about something with your test; why was your water temp higher with the Heatkiller than in either EK test? I don't expect a block to cool down the water, normally that's a result of differing conditions with the radiator (and possibly the fans).
As Xandrus said, it's more of a preview than a review. I'm pretty sure the fantastic guys who usely test these Great things, Bundymania, Vapour, Skinnee and HESmelaugh. Will be all be doing they own tests.
So, what do you think guys, is it worthy upgrading from Supreme to Supreme HF? Is DDC-1T good enough or do I need D5 for HF?
@Cele303
The HF seems to be at least 3° better on the cores and it has a much better flow. So do it!
@Captain H.N.
As you will know the real testing of "our toys" requires a better and more exact equipment than I owe. My Aquaero, sensors and software tools are absolutely good enough for my private needs, but not for any kind of laboratory testing. I just wanted to know if the HF is at eye level with the Heatkiller 3.0. And now I know he is.
The missing stock plate wonīt show better cooling performance than the 3 stripe plate, it will be somewhere between the two I have already tested.
For me itīs a good idea to mistrust any test you find on the web or at least compare different results. If a "toy" seems to be interesting to me I prefer to test it on myself and in my own system.
This is good news! Way to go Eddy! :clap:
Nice!
My only suggestion to anyone testing and tinkering would be to try putting a nice radius on the leading edges (Top side away from the copper microchannels) of the slotted holes. It should be relatively easy with a small disc or tapered diamond bit.
Depending on how much the nozzle plates contribute to pressure drop, you could see a fairly dramatic improvement to flow rate. Assuming a similar relationship to culvert entrance losses, you could see up to something like a 40% reduction in head loss going from a square (Lazer Cut) type edge to something nicely rounded.
http://www.fsl.orst.edu/geowater/FX3...oefficient.htm
Not sure the extra flow relates to anything measureable thermally, but it I can't see how it could harmful.
Eddy how is the white acetal top version coming along? I've got Christmas money burning a hole in my pocket. :)
i'm waiting for the final review of this new unit :D