what u rekon fellaz??? maybe the game will be better optimized before final release??Quote:
so i'm guessing i couldn't max this out @ 1680 x 1050 with my gtx @ 660/2040,2gb ram and quad @ 3.2ghz
Printable View
what u rekon fellaz??? maybe the game will be better optimized before final release??Quote:
so i'm guessing i couldn't max this out @ 1680 x 1050 with my gtx @ 660/2040,2gb ram and quad @ 3.2ghz
play the demo and see how it goes.
my pc ain't up and running lol.... won't be until i get my ek block's from eddie....
using crappy old 939 rig atm... :)
hey! dont diss 939!
lol sorry dude.... my old 939 is good for anything but gaming... that's what i meant... :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by darkorb
Crysis Demo, all medium settings, 1920x1200
GPU Timedemo
169.02 Driver
All stock clocks
My 8800GTS 640 = 31fps Average, 46fps Max
My 8800GT 512 = 41fps Average, 56fps Max
Not bad!
Wow the GT is better than I thought. :eek: TyQuote:
Originally Posted by Soulburner
No AA or AF though. I expect if those were enabled the framerate would drop to that of GTS 640 levels.
Just overclocked to 682/1705/2006 and managed 47fps average and 59fps max. That's a 6fps increase in the average from the stock clocks of 600/1500/1800 which is quite good.
Min is 34-35fps. Perfect :cool:
nice hope my gtx perform's well @ 1650 x 1050 @ med setting's
Vista x86
Core 2 E6400@3500
2GB@1000 CL5
1680x1050
No AA
2nd loop of GPU bench
NV v169.04
8800 GTX
648 core
1512 shader
2000 memory
Very High 18 FPS
High 33 FPS
Obviously Very High's only tolerable if you go prone. :D The difference between the two's quite staggering IMO. The depth of field and motion blur are much more subtle. The lighting and shadows look far more realistic too. Here's to hoping for a 50% increase from driver/game optimization and Vista x64. :D
thanks for that mate... give's me a idea of what i can expect fps wise...
My rig is similar to your's aswell except for 4gb and quad.... don't know how much difference that will make....
Yeah i'm really hoping there's a bit more optimization before it's release...
will crysis support sli??
cheers
W/ any luck, it'll get you some Very High. :D
High is very playable and I'm usually quite picky about framerates. The game isn't FEAR Combat or UT so 60 isn't really the magic number.
Calling S939 old? Here's S462.:D
Totally-not-extreme-report:
I was surprised that I could play the demo at all with:
- AXP 2000+, 1.5 GB RAM, R9800 Pro
- A64 X2 4000+ 65 nm, 2 GB RAM, Asus M2A-VM AMD 690G integrated graphics(!)
Yeah all settings on low, 800 x 600, and mostly under 10 FPS, especially the older one.
You don't have to tell me that this is not the way it's meant to be played . . . I know that. ;) :rofl:
Playing this demo at normal difficulty is stupid, you can just run away from most enemies without even shooting. I'm glad I played it set to Delta.
Yea, 939 here too and proud :p:
My performance settings/info --> http://www.tacinept.com/kuhlas_stuff...s-settings.jpg
Full rig specs in sig below.
I finished tweaking the config files, and am now running at 1280x1024, 36fps(min 31 max 46) avg on my 320mb gts that I tweaked to 675/1728/999. Shader clocks have a phenomenal effect on this games performance. I'll let you guess whether my screenies are DX10 or DX9.
I had to set my texture and water settings to med, the 320mb are just not enough for high/ultra high.
http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/4830/ss1uy0.th.jpg
Nice shadows ;)
http://img467.imageshack.us/img467/8989/ss2rr6.th.jpg
Paradise...
http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/3507/ss3ke8.th.jpg
Sun rays filtering through the trees...
http://img467.imageshack.us/img467/7259/ss4tv7.th.jpg
More sun rays
http://img467.imageshack.us/img467/7270/ss5ge3.th.jpg
Wadya mean there is no service out here?
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/84/ss6te1.th.jpg
Dry riverbed
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/3726/ss7gr8.th.jpg
I see the light...
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/382/ss8il3.th.jpg
Dirty visor
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/9650/ss9zm9.th.jpg
Nanananana...
Here is a fully maxxed DX10 SS for reference:
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/9...270ods1.th.jpg
Although Crysis CAN look slightly better than what I have, it will not run at 30-40 fps at those settings. I think I found the sweet spot ;). What do you think? Plus, with final tweaks before it is released, and optimized drivers, Im pretty sure that the game will run like a dream on my system. Isn;t it funny how 1 game can turn the worlds fastest consumer graphics card obsolete overnight?
new driver(169.02) ,new card (8800GT) and new scores :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulburner
DX10 high 1280x1024 default clock->36fps
DX10 high 1280x1024 oc 750/1000->41fps
XP Pro DX9 high 1280x1024 default clock->38fps
XP Pro DX9 high 1280x1024 OC 750/1000->43fps
new video (new weapons)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFrS4mYoR2s
i think a gtx will manage to be very playable with high settings and 2-4x aa and 8xaf...:) @ 1680x1050...Quote:
nice hope my gtx perform's well @ 1650 x 1050 @ med setting's
i reckon you'll get 40+ fps...at least@4x8x
i saw a post in another thread and some dude was bragging about how he got 40-60 fps on an oced gtx in crysis with 4x8x @ 1920x1200.....so 1680x1050 should be a piece of pi$$ with the gtx.
i get around this with 2x8x at 1280x1024....a tad lower with 4x8xQuote:
XP Pro DX9 high 1280x1024 default clock->38fps
XP Pro DX9 high 1280x1024 OC 750/1000->43fps
Some day we will have playable multisampling in Crysis...maybe 4Q 2008 or 1Q 2009...
i got antialiasing-transparency multisampling turned on....
supersampling sposed to increase quality and multisampling sposed to increase performance.
is that when the next gen cards are due? :rofl:Quote:
maybe 4Q 2008 or 1Q 2009
With an 8800GT? Doubt it. I saw what happened when someone tried that - they ended up with 7-8fps. That foliage just kills anything we have.
tried what?Quote:
I saw what happened when someone tried that
i havent used supersampling.. i use multisampling. maybe ill turn it off and see what happens.
I'll have to play around with it in the morning. It was my understanding that those modes, which anti-alias the foliage mostly, make the game unplayable. I saw screenshots of 7-8fps but I don't know the rest of their settings.
i'm not sure but multisampling makes no difference to fps...i'm in the game now and just did it ...
um now trying supersampling (which i would think is more what yr talking about...) back in a tick :)
yeah i just tried turning on supersampling and fps went down by 9-10 fps ;)
im at 1280x1024 at high settings with 4x 8x. 35 fps max...multisampling
& 26 fps max supersampling...
http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x...leath/cry2.jpg
super s.
http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x...leath/cry1.jpg
multi s.
8800gt @ 690/1736/1900
and if i look up at a clear patch of sky with a few palm fronds in it i can get 56fps with 4x8x ms :hehe:
in heavy foliage screens while moving..fps go down to 20-25. 4x8x ms.
http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x...leath/cry3.jpg
http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x...leath/cry4.jpg
http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x...leath/cry5.jpg
http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x...leath/cry9.jpg
gunsight focus like a camera lens...cool.
http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x...leath/cry7.jpg
look mum invisible
wow this game's looks real nice!!
any chance for a blood patch btw? it's kinda annoying not to get that. with far cry you could add that and the ragdoll behaviour via changing some bits and pieces .. how about here? soldier of fortune 2 style ;)