Originally Posted by MrBean
Hey Dinos22,
Even though my postcount is very low, I have been a member of this site for quite many years :) Just haven't been that active over here, as there are many sites to browse/reply etc.
I am well aware of the "requirements" of some of these sites, but just recently the face of overclocking has started to change all over the world, with many newbies to overclocking making big inroads into territories usually the playground of more established names.
I have myself been in the top 10 numerous times, when the Macci/Fugger/OPP/Shamino's etc were very active, I have always enjoyed decent competition, and took what most guys presented at face value.
It will be very difficult to bull:banana::banana::banana::banana: an accomplished overclocker, and I have seen no evidence from the original poster of that intent.
In actual fact, I think with a good yield chipset, running single chan mem, at dividers, it may very well be feasible, even quite believable.
I would believe that clock, because for one simple fact - look at what his SuperPI time is, and start doing tests yourself with single chan mem, and reverse-polate your times with what dual-channel setup would give you at certain speeds, dividers, etc, vs single-channel setup.
Then quite a few will discover that indeed his times tie up with clocks and single channel.
Sometimes all that's needed is a little thinking.
My point is that this is becoming an increasing unfriendly place, with too many spectators waiting to play referee.
But yes, let's hope this is just a phase, and that we would be mature enough to accept, and understand when someone has accomplished something special, like in this case, and that we can give credit.
Sometimes you don't need all the proof in the world to accept a record like this, all you need is to use the gray matter so many claim to have an excess of :)
Not aimed at you, just in general.
Kind regards,
MrBean.
