4 cores in 1,Conroe E6600 8Mb Cache,Kentsfield result@MSI 975X

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

06-20-2006, 08:32 PM
SamHughe

Dudes! He just posted 8sn SP 1M and you're still talking about AMD vs. Intel?!?!
06-20-2006, 08:34 PM
coldpower27

Quote:

Originally Posted by SamHughe

Dudes! He just posted 8sn SP 1M and you're still talking about AMD vs. Intel?!?!

It's roughtly 25s total for each of the 4 instacnes of Super PI 1M, he was taken screenshots at 3 distinct time indexes.
06-20-2006, 08:42 PM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by alpha0ne

But I've only just got used to using 2 cores :( :eek: :D

:D :D :D heheheh
06-20-2006, 08:44 PM
Mule

Quote:

Originally Posted by coldpower27

It's roughtly 25s total for each of the 4 instacnes of Super PI 1M, he was taken screenshots at 3 distinct time indexes.

Looks like the CPU-Load History graph would suggest otherwise.
06-20-2006, 08:45 PM
XFxGeforced

Quote:

Originally Posted by coldpower27

It's roughtly 25s total for each of the 4 instacnes of Super PI 1M, he was taken screenshots at 3 distinct time indexes.

i was wondering about this, do you add them up or something to get the results to compare to a single core, or how does that work?
06-20-2006, 08:46 PM
coolaler

OC 2.7g@cinebench2003
fast than 2.4g 2sec

http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/13.gif
06-20-2006, 08:49 PM
cMw

Quote:

Originally Posted by XFxGeforced

that's what I'm talking about :toast:

just a thought, how would this compare to a quad dual-core opteron setup?

mickeymouse has one but i think he had like one 7900GT at the time or something or atleast thats the only score i remember seeing from him wiht that, he was running at 3ghz and got like 7k something on 3dm06 with the single GT
06-20-2006, 08:52 PM
Nanometer

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bloody_Sorcerer

someone at AMD just passed out? No, I think someone at AMD just grinned to himself and played with a K8L ES...
2k7 could be interesting!

Oh.... I really doubt it.

I think I just pooped a little.
06-20-2006, 08:54 PM
coolaler

spi@quadcores

http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/14.gif

change cores to single

http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/15.gif

spi@singlecore

http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/16.gif

singlecore is no better and make slower
06-20-2006, 08:57 PM
Ldawg

:eek2: ljwkefhklwehfkljef....i just shat myself....

...twice
06-20-2006, 08:59 PM
i||uSi0n^

very nice indeed...

i||uSi0n^
06-20-2006, 09:02 PM
coolaler

oc 2.8g@cinebench2003
broke 17s

http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/17.gif
06-20-2006, 09:05 PM
dz_jad

this is sweet. I just wish I knew how much it was blowing everything out of the water..... I'm not a benchmarker in the past. or currently. but maybe the future.

I think that beats my XP Barton 2800+ @ 1.3 GHz :mad: someone touched the compy without permission..
06-20-2006, 09:13 PM
sxs112

Very nice:toast:
Kentsfiled:banana: :banana:
06-20-2006, 09:19 PM
hookid

holy god....
06-20-2006, 09:19 PM
SoulGG

Respirator time:D
06-20-2006, 09:21 PM
coolaler

oc 2.9g@cinebench2003
16.4S

http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/18.gif

oc 3.0g@cinebench2003
16.0S

http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...NSFIELD/19.gif
06-20-2006, 09:25 PM
Fuzzy_3D

Quote:

Originally Posted by coolaler

oc 2.9g@cinebench2003
16.4S

Rendering (x CPU) 1606

Just for reference,
The Quad Core PowerMac G5 2.5Ghz scored 1102

You've just gone mad.
06-20-2006, 09:33 PM
`odin

This is the point were fast gets another meaning, Intel....
06-20-2006, 09:46 PM
k0nsl

I think I'd want one of these :)

Could we please see a Rosetta bench with this monster?

-k0nsl
06-20-2006, 10:03 PM
STEvil

Quote:

Originally Posted by cMw

mickeymouse has one but i think he had like one 7900GT at the time or something or atleast thats the only score i remember seeing from him wiht that, he was running at 3ghz and got like 7k something on 3dm06 with the single GT

dual dualcore to be exact. Anyone got the benches hanging around for some comparrison?
06-20-2006, 10:04 PM
theteamaqua

As amazing as that cpu is, i think i might just go with E6600 this year and prolly E6800 or X6900 next year. I still prefer higher clock dual core since OC ability should be better, less heat. Hate to be a stickler, but the super pi 1M score wasnt that good, and it will prolly be $999. In that case, i think i am going for a X6900 4Ghz (or more) air 24/7 :) Well if its not $999 then count me in.
06-20-2006, 10:29 PM
NiCKE^

That's just brutal cinebench results!!
06-20-2006, 10:35 PM
pcoffman

Quote:

Originally Posted by ethernal

there is certainly a noticable scaling drop

Quote:

Originally Posted by ethernal

Still, something is clearly slowing it down a tad ... Some of that could be the software's threading inefficiency. But still, there is a decrease in scaling

Quote:

Originally Posted by accord99

It's the program, Cinebench scales poorly past 2 cores

I would think that software needs to be (re-)written to take full advantage of four cores and beyond.

"optimizing the software ... as you move to 4, 8, 16, 32 [cores], that requires architectural changes ... If we're going to keep those cores working for the user and not just sitting idle, it requires actually some very, very innovative work ... a lot of the performance gains will come from ... making sure we have the right parallelism" -- Bill Gates
06-20-2006, 10:36 PM
selder

Brutal, really brutal. You could play 2 games at the same time, and run Rosetta twice, and don't feel it :p

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page