HT2 isn't HT :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuji
Like all pre-release news, you must take it all with a grain of salt.
Printable View
HT2 isn't HT :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuji
Like all pre-release news, you must take it all with a grain of salt.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tombman
im with you on that.
i have my doubts now
Conroe Extreme edition right here-
http://www.importjdm.com/cxe.jpg
"Whilst this does not mean it won't ever be included, it is clear that there are currently no plans to include it. The reasoning for this is that it was a bridging technology to bring multi and dual core to us all."
Yeah, that sounds like a pretty damn inconclusive report. Let me summarize that paragraph for you: "Yeah, no HT, umm, wait, maybe it will, don't know, things could change.....uhhhh, yeah, we have no idea."
so if k8l is good or beats conroe, they will release ht2...Quote:
Originally Posted by freecableguy
2.93GHz, 1066FSB = Correct.
Hyperthreading in current Conroes = Completely made up.
Prove me wrong, I dare you.
And that goes for Fugger, FCG, anyone.
where on xs do they(you guys) have like a benchmark page for conroe xe??? since someone just got the es.
it is under nda for another 5 days. Check out freecableguy's signature.
Quote:
Conroe XE = real
HT2 = not real
hope this cleared some stuff up.
If Fugger say there is there probably is... and nothing intel is secret cuz fugger usually some how get it ;)Quote:
No HT2? fugger and FCG say there is
You may be right. In fact, reviewing information with others in the business I tend to believe you are correct. There is no HT for Conroe XE. It didn't make sense that it would in the first place but I did have very compelling data that suggested otherwise for a little while.Quote:
Originally Posted by FLG_Poncho
Anway, joining XS to share your opinion of FUGGER's level of knowledge and stating:
isn't exactly getting off on the right foot. My suggestion to you is that you demonstrate a little more tact in the future. If you do feel that you must post this information, Hardforum is a great place to share your uninformed opinion. :) thanks. ;)Quote:
....the guy doesn't know what he is talking about.
no Willis, he is not an Intel employee. :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Willis
you're telling an Intel employee that he's got an uninformed opinion? *bangs head on desk*Quote:
Originally Posted by freecableguy
you missed my point. im not talking about your opinion regarding HT on the XE. i'm talking about your opinion with respect to fugger's level of understanding. you need to get off your high horse. no one is impressed and you're quickly demonstrating your undesirable attitude. if you have something further to take up with me, pls PM me and I will be happy to discuss with you in private.Quote:
Originally Posted by FLG_Poncho
-FCG
Come on dewd, this is Fugger's place, a little more tact would be in order here. See the crack about [H]ardforum? They could use some of the stuff that's not under NDA that you've posted, don't get shut out over this issue.:nono:Quote:
Originally Posted by FLG_Poncho
I've talked to poncho sevearal times and he knows what he's talking about (he works for Intel after all. There are several other Intel employees at [H] too).
http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1055342
Of course, he can't answer half of my questions being that most of my questions are gaurded by NDA.
He also had screenshots of Conroe way before XS or anyone had them.
Poncho, if nothing else, could you give us some sort of word about release date? All sorts of rumors floating around, and these engineering samples are getting tiring...
poncho can you run super pi on the XE??
wow, thats great, we finally get someone here with some real knowledge rather than all the BS (that gets rather deep) around here and he basically gets told to go F-himself and to go post on [H] just because he called out FUGGER.... who's on the "high-horse"?
:rehab::cheer2:
Poncho, please feel free to post as much as you can. thanks :toast:
Please, stop the bull:banana::banana::banana::banana: in this thread. Nobody needs it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Camel
Let this be the last post about this, PM me if you hate me or whatever ;)
don't start down this path. i'm warning you. just knock it off.Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Camel
I'm guessing that people relay what they are told
People at XS do know what they are talking about
Anyway i'm upset that the XE won't be 3.33/1333, but XE is XE and we're looking at the same overclocking headroom i guess. Stock speeds don't matter much cuz i'm there for all of 30 seconds to check temps ;).
But if the new XE is 2.93/1066 and costs the same as the 3.33 would have, that's disappointing. But it's true that intel doesn't need to release the 3.33 yet, it's excessive. Looks like they're saving it up to try to stomp on whatever AMD might get out in the 2nd 1/2 of 06.
Maybe by q1 07 though we'll see a 3.66 XE Conroe ;)
They would need it to compete with K8L, i was thinking K8L added ~10-20% performance by many people (see sig) are claiming much greater performance from K8L, and it's not just nn_step, i'm starting to think that i'm underestimating K8L. Only time will tell though.
All you company employees, spill the beans dammit! :D
JoeCamel, that is enough. Period. If you dont have anything to decent say, then dont.Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Camel
If I receive another complaint about you there will be repercussions.
IFMU