Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by ruff97
thats what i´ve suspected , maybe peedfan its the right one , with C2D E4300 its same thing , speedfan reads low temps than coretemp
Dazog download Speefan and try it out :)
speedfan >> http://www.almico.com/speedfan.php
:up:
are you say speedfan is the right temp becuase if it is i am going to push it more
Didn't try for max yet, just installed mine 1 hour ago and currently doing some baseline checks (temps and stability at stock voltage). I will try tonight for max or tomorrow and will report back...Quote:
Originally Posted by miochza
speedfan reports much lower temps.
I think you'll be limited to 3.5ish with the xbx2 :(
ncix upped the prices after the initial cut on the Canadian site, due to low supply or something.
Same thing probably happened on the US site, it was 260 and then bumped back up. Right now its on sale for $1.50 off the regular price so it was probably alot lower before.
http://forum.ncix.com/forums/index.p...oduct_id=22211
Why are you saying this ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Supertim0r
I ran my E4300 to 3.6 (9x400) fine so I know I may be able to reach the same ballpark...
are you using watercooling????Quote:
Originally Posted by ruff97
your temps are pretty good even in Coretemp , 3500mhz = 45c Idle ( coretemp ) :up:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dazog
how much ???
and coretemp 0.94 , did you try it???
:up:
max fsb with a quad core on XBX2 is 395ishQuote:
Originally Posted by Xilikon
Quote:
Originally Posted by mascaras
Speedfan reports temperatures 15c cooler than coretemp
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dazog
so 70c FULL @ 3200mhz @ Watercooled ????
i think its also too high temp , maybe its the waterblock >>
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ght=storm+quad
anyway check if the storm its correctly mounted
:up:
3500mhz -- 45C Idle (coretemp) its really good , are you using watercooling????Quote:
Originally Posted by ruff97
regards
I think Speedfan 4.32 is reporting the correct temp.
I think what everyone fails to see is that the Tjunction is 100c for the Q6600.
Coretemp 0.95 isn't reporting the temp the way we interpret it.
Simple math substraction gives me that the 4 core temp reading form coretemp 0.95 - 15c = speedfan 4.32 core temp readings.
A little background on the accuracy of core temp readings from speedfan 4.32:
Take my E6700 for example (please see my sig)
When I was using Vista 32bit, I could opened up coretemp 0.95, Intel TAT and Speedfan 4.32 to check to see if all temp reading were reading the same. The result is they're all reporting the temp the same with only 1~2c off difference.
When I swithced to Vista 64bit, I cannot longer use the Coretemp 0.94/95 and Intel TAT becouse the softwares aren't written to support the Vista x64 but I could still use Speedfan 4.32 and the temp is still reading exactly the same as before on Vista 32bit but a few degrees cooler becouse the AC MX-1 paste has settled in.
I remember reading somewhere else Speedfan actually reads the Tjunction properly and takes it into account than Coretemp does. Speedfan basically acts exactly the same as coretemp becouse they all can read the temp from the diodode so the accuracy is the same but speedfan takes Tjunection into account so in the end watever the readings from Speedfan4.32 should be accurate.
I'll first lap my Thermalright Ultra120 Extreme becouse it's very convex and after I get everything setup I'll also post my temp/OC results.
It's good thing that all three of us have the exact same batch L723A765 - Dazog, Xilikon and I.
We should have almost identical OC / temp readings. If Dazog temp is off by that much, that means the fault must lies somwhere else and not the CPU itself. Xilikon's temp is already diff than Dazog but the same batch. I'll give in my result later tonight....
Yea i will have to pick up a new block.
Looks like the storm can't handle the 4 cores.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mascaras
Yes i am watercool. it is in my rig
nice temps and nice CPU :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by ruff97
regards
usa ...if you pm me your invoice or post it i'll ask for the difference in price . wish i could have seen them at $260 i would have got a couple . maybe i should call themQuote:
Originally Posted by palese
here temp at full load
http://www.ruffrd.com/rdpic/wcpc/newupwc.JPG
can any one tell me how to run ORTHOS for all 4 core it is just run it for two of the core
I think the fact that he uses a Storm is the biggest reason of the poor temps. Storms are poor on LGA775, nevertheless quad core where the jets are barely even hitting the CPU dies. If you went to a Fuzion your temps would decreases drastically.
Prime 25.3Quote:
Originally Posted by ruff97
check in task manager if CPU usage its 100%Quote:
Originally Posted by ruff97
regards
then is what i am use Prime 25.3, but i think ORTHOS can eun on all core tooQuote:
Originally Posted by virtualrain
Lets see some more results guys!
Just sourced a place that will ship me a g0 here in Australia so curious to see how they go!
just two of the core are being testQuote:
Originally Posted by mascaras
Quote:
Originally Posted by ruff97
Run two instances then set the affinity of the 2nd program to use core 3 and 4