Pifast Benchmark

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

05-01-2003, 09:54 AM
reglisse

with the 4.2 version :)

http://membres.lycos.fr/reglissement.../pifast10m.jpg
05-01-2003, 10:07 AM
JCviggen

Quote:

Originally posted by reglisse
you uses Version 4.1 of PIFAST but we use the last Version 4.2

Quote:

**PIfast challange uses Version 4.1 of PIFAST to maintain a standard please use per download link and submit 'Total computation time'.

4.2 is shorter, and so its also a bit easier. So for the bench, only 4.1 counts. doesnt matter that a faster version exists, the fastest 4.1 time will be the fastest in 4.2 anyway, only its a little harder and requires more stability. In other words, a better challenge than 4.2
05-01-2003, 10:26 AM
reglisse

sorry but i'm french and my english is very bad ... :rolleyes:

i'm ok with you said, but for on my site we decide to take the 4.2 version for the bench and 50Millions of digits

the 4.1 version more difficult for the P4 ;)
05-01-2003, 10:59 AM
PMM

Me and M@tt decided to keep the 4.1 version due to the fact
that results and validation would tie up with the results that
were once part of Kain's Pifast Challange before it wen't Off
line.

Kains Pifast always used the 4.1 version as hosted on Hexus
together with the Hexus batch file for setting the parameters
to do the calculation.

When David at Hexus offered us the hosting at Hexus.net we
set everything up as per before so those that competed in Kain's
Pifast challenge were able to re-submit there last scores as per
Kain's and carry on as normal which I knew were valid from cached pages of Kains Site.

It was dicussed if we were to use 4.2 but everyone prefered sticking with 4.1.

So 4.1. it shall be :)
05-01-2003, 01:23 PM
CodeRed

Quote:

Originally posted by M@tt
:toast: CodeRed I will have to try a little harder tomorrow

Try 7-2-2-2, it worked for me.

I aint finished yet, the board is still stock and my prom still runs R134a.
05-01-2003, 01:56 PM
hipro5

Quote:

Originally posted by PMM
Me and M@tt decided to keep the 4.1 version due to the fact
that results and validation would tie up with the results that
were once part of Kain's Pifast Challange before it wen't Off
line.

Kains Pifast always used the 4.1 version as hosted on Hexus
together with the Hexus batch file for setting the parameters
to do the calculation.

When David at Hexus offered us the hosting at Hexus.net we
set everything up as per before so those that competed in Kain's
Pifast challenge were able to re-submit there last scores as per
Kain's and carry on as normal which I knew were valid from cached pages of Kains Site.

It was dicussed if we were to use 4.2 but everyone prefered sticking with 4.1.

So 4.1. it shall be :)

One question.....Is it possible that Version 4.1 is "more optimised" for an AMD CPU???.....Perhaps the V.4.2 is more accurate for BOTH Intel and AMD....Just a question..... :)
05-01-2003, 02:20 PM
JCviggen

actually I think 4.1 is more raw power code, whereas 4.2 "assists" the P4 in avoiding its weak points.... or you could say that its just optimized code which enables the P4 to make most of the optimisations
05-01-2003, 05:38 PM
xgman

Duration : 59.61 secondson 4.1.

so what does that mean anyway.
05-01-2003, 09:36 PM
reglisse

Quote:

Originally posted by hipro5
One question.....Is it possible that Version 4.1 is "more optimised" for an AMD CPU???.....Perhaps the V.4.2 is more accurate for BOTH Intel and AMD....Just a question..... :)

the V. 4.2 is "more optimised" for 512ko of the p4 ... it's all
05-01-2003, 10:23 PM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally posted by JCviggen
I did some more tweaking today, and I took down the 50s mark :)

http://users.pandora.be/JCviggen/PI.JPG

Good job, nice oc
is it with ur 1700+?
05-02-2003, 12:29 AM
M@tt

Quote:

Originally posted by CodeRed
Try 7-2-2-2, it worked for me.

I aint finished yet, the board is still stock and my prom still runs R134a.

Will do, Thanks CodeRed

I also have a NF7-S V2.0 to try again and the Prommie is having a service today ;) I am still using the 8RGA+ at the moment.
05-02-2003, 01:36 AM
JCviggen

Quote:

Originally posted by cpulloverclock

is it with ur 1700+?

yup :)
the CPU can run this higher, but the FSB wont let me... doing NF7 cap mod today I think
05-02-2003, 01:50 AM
hipro5

Quote:

Originally posted by JCviggen
actually I think 4.1 is more raw power code, whereas 4.2 "assists" the P4 in avoiding its weak points.... or you could say that its just optimized code which enables the P4 to make most of the optimisations

Is it because some AMD guys want that???.....just another question.......If an Intel guy benches the V.4.2 and an AMD guy as well , the "deference" between those two is it going to be LEES(in seconds) than the V.4.1...?????....I think as the software is getting better we SHOULD go on with it..!!!....It's like you benching 3DMark2000 and NOT the 3DMark2001 or 2003.....Just wondering.....

EDIT : I was just at Pi-fast's page and I DIDN'T read ANYTHING about "optimized code which enables the P4 to make most of the optimisations" in V.4.2.....It JUST says as the V.4.1 version about a bit faster and repaired some bugs(same as they did at V.4.1).....I think that something "fishy" around here..... :stick:
05-02-2003, 02:55 AM
CodeRed

Ok hipro I'll bite (just this once), so whats your fastest v4.2 time
05-02-2003, 03:04 AM
reglisse

yes but with pifast v 4.2, 10M is too short, 50M is good no short no long ... look my site for the best time
05-02-2003, 03:31 AM
hipro5

Quote:

Originally posted by CodeRed
Ok hipro I'll bite (just this once), so whats your fastest v4.2 time

I don't have V.4.2 "fixed" bench to test it......If someone has it please give me a link to download it.....Thanks in advance..... :)
05-02-2003, 03:52 AM
reglisse

http://numbers.computation.free.fr/C.../download.html
05-02-2003, 03:55 AM
hipro5

Quote:

Originally posted by reglisse
http://numbers.computation.free.fr/C.../download.html

Thanks but.....I didn't ment that....I mean a "fixed" V.4.2 as the V.4.1 that you don't have to "put" numbers and the other things it asks you to run it........Just "click" and run..... ;)
05-02-2003, 04:01 AM
reglisse

for 10M or 50M of digits ?
05-02-2003, 04:06 AM
reglisse

:) sorry i don't understand all

for 50M of digit here :

http://membres.lycos.fr/reglissementhe/tele.php3

for 10M of digits

edit reglage.txt and change

4096 --> 1024

5000000 --> 1000000
05-02-2003, 05:14 AM
sysfailur

Very nice benches people! :) I just RMA'ed my a7n8x. We'll see what I can do with a rev 2.0 *rawr*
05-02-2003, 06:23 AM
hipro5

Quote:

Originally posted by reglisse
:) sorry i don't understand all

for 50M of digit here :

http://membres.lycos.fr/reglissementhe/tele.php3

for 10M of digits

edit reglage.txt and change

4096 --> 1024

5000000 --> 1000000

Thanks A LOT...... :toast:
05-02-2003, 06:25 AM
hipro5

.........NOW......Can someone with an AMD system bench this V.4.2 at about 2700MHz Please.......Thank you...... :)
05-02-2003, 08:01 AM
JCviggen

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally posted by hipro5
.........NOW......Can someone with an AMD system bench this V.4.2 at about 2700MHz Please.......Thank you...... :)

you ask, we bench :)

not exactly 2700, but only 10 MHz off
05-02-2003, 09:08 AM
hipro5

Quote:

Originally posted by JCviggen
you ask, we bench :)

not exactly 2700, but only 10 MHz off

Thanks JC....... ;) :toast:

Now.......I think that IF we ALL try the V.4.2 one , the Intel "times" are going to be FASTER than the AMD's ones.......Bet anyone???? :D

I think THAT'S why you ALL AMD guys "insist" for V.4.1 which "could" have a "bug" for Intel CPU's..... :stick:
05-02-2003, 09:18 AM
JCviggen

Quote:

Originally posted by hipro5
Thanks JC....... ;) :toast:

Now.......I think that IF we ALL try the V.4.2 one , the Intel "times" are going to be FASTER than the AMD's ones.......Bet anyone???? :D

I think THAT'S why you ALL AMD guys "insist" for V.4.1 which "could" have a "bug" for Intel CPU's..... :stick:

Hipro,

I wouldnt say there's a "bug" in it for Intel CPU's...
I've been doing a little google, and the use of 4.1/4.2 is about 50/50.
Basically, most of the rankings on the net use 4.1 simply because most results are already like this. Only after the rankings started came 4.2. Now if anyone were to start a new ranking, it would be only normal that 4.2 would be used.
I think in 4.1, AMD's have a too big advantage over the P4. However, in 4.2 it looks to me like the P4 is too far ahead. So I guess to be exact, you should combine the time of the old one with the new one and take the average :D

a 3 GHz XP is definately the equal of a 4 GHz+ P4

Quote:

Originally posted by hipro5
Enjoy your entries for now , coz in a couple of weeks you'll be HISTORY....... :D :toast:

so, how about you make good on that "promise" instead of §§§§§ing about the version ;)
05-02-2003, 09:27 AM
hipro5

Quote:

Originally posted by JCviggen
Hipro,

I wouldnt say there's a "bug" in it for Intel CPU's...
I've been doing a little google, and the use of 4.1/4.2 is about 50/50.
Basically, most of the rankings on the net use 4.1 simply because most results are already like this. Only after the rankings started came 4.2. Now if anyone were to start a new ranking, it would be only normal that 4.2 would be used.
I think in 4.1, AMD's have a too big advantage over the P4. However, in 4.2 it looks to me like the P4 is too far ahead. So I guess to be exact, you should combine the time of the old one with the new one and take the average :D

a 3 GHz XP is definately the equal of a 4 GHz+ P4

so, how about you make good on that "promise" instead of §§§§§ing about the version ;)

:D :D :D :toast:

I'm just.........WAITING for the ABIT Canterwood Mobo and the unlocked P4 3.06GHz and I'LL BE BACK....... ;) :D
05-03-2003, 04:23 AM
JCviggen

1 Attachment(s)

im sorry for the continuing flow of scores, but you have to understand, I dont have a gfx card to do 3D, I'm bored as hell down here and I gotto do sumthin.... :)
05-03-2003, 11:42 AM
avicenna

Quote:

Originally posted by JCviggen
im sorry for the continuing flow of scores, but you have to understand, I dont have a gfx card to do 3D, I'm bored as hell down here and I gotto do sumthin.... :)

Hahah keep ´em coming, great work!
05-03-2003, 12:04 PM
CodeRed

Quote:

Originally posted by JCviggen
im sorry for the continuing flow of scores, but you have to understand, I dont have a gfx card to do 3D, I'm bored as hell down here and I gotto do sumthin.... :)

Outstanding, truly outstanding.

:toast:

Now hurry up and get a gfx card so the rest of us can catch up :D
05-04-2003, 08:41 AM
muzz

I thought everyone was using the same version from Hexus?
If not maybe they should be.
05-04-2003, 09:02 AM
hipro5

Quote:

Originally posted by muzz
I thought everyone was using the same version from Hexus?
If not maybe they should be.

They ALL DO ..... V.4.1 .... ;)
05-05-2003, 03:43 AM
CodeRed

Slowly improving my score

http://users.tpg.com.au/spark69/r404/pifast3.jpg

really need a better mobo, I aint near this chips limit yet.
05-05-2003, 10:58 AM
Tom Holck

1 Attachment(s)

Albatron px65PE pro

try an Intel 1102 FSB
05-05-2003, 01:33 PM
CodeRed

Re: Albatron px65PE pro

Quote:

Originally posted by Tom Holck
try an Intel 1102 FSB

Looks like the AMD party is over. Take cover everyone, the invasion of the Canterwoods is about to start :D

Nice result BTW :toast:

Do I switch to the dark side? this is the question
:wave: AMD
05-05-2003, 04:14 PM
hipro5

WELL DONE Tom........ :toast: :banana: :banana:

With what CPU is this benchie??? :D
05-06-2003, 01:58 AM
Tom Holck

Hi Hipro5

Quote:

Originally posted by hipro5
WELL DONE Tom........ :toast: :banana: :banana:

With what CPU is thiw bencie??? :D

It's a P4 3000/800;)

I first tried it in the old Abit IT7Max2 v2 and it was not better than the old 3.066, so it's the FSB that do the trick.

-and the prommy mod -you now:D

desent ram will cut 1 sek or so...
05-06-2003, 07:22 AM
hipro5

Re: Hi Hipro5

Quote:

Originally posted by Tom Holck
It's a P4 3000/800;)

I first tried it in the old Abit IT7Max2 v2 and it was not better than the old 3.066, so it's the FSB that do the trick.

-and the prommy mod -you now:D

desent ram will cut 1 sek or so...

Coollll.......Have you tried the P4 3.06GHz on this Mobo to see how it does???......and DO you remember the FPO/BATCH of your new CPU P4 3GHz(800fsb)....Thanks in advance...... :D
05-06-2003, 09:59 AM
Tom Holck

1 Attachment(s)

Hi Hipro

The FPO/Batch # : L309A569

I think the 3000 is better than the 2.80, 2.66 etc in the first time of producktion.

The 3.066 perform like your dual DDR board. The mem can be tweeaked a little better (1.33 1.60 2.00 2.5 2.66 etc)
It can NOT go at 800 (fsb200 x 23 = 4600 :rolleyes: :D )

JC Viggens and others statement on the max fsb on Abit IT7:
IT7Max2 v 1 (reed and blue) IT7Max2 v 1.1 and IT7Max2 v 2
are not precise. With 3000/800 They can all go almost 200
(with voltmod etc etc)
-But that history now.

Hope you get your Springdale sune
:banana: :banana: :banana:
05-06-2003, 06:56 PM
Spec3

1 Attachment(s)

Abit NF7-S
OCZ pc3500EL
XP1700 0308XPMW
:toast:
05-06-2003, 07:00 PM
Spec3

1 Attachment(s)

Ah sorry that was ver 4.2 I didn't see it had to be 4.1

Here is 4.1 at the same settings
05-07-2003, 07:28 AM
Tom Holck

1 Attachment(s)

Hi Spec3

4.1
:D :D :D
05-07-2003, 07:29 AM
Tom Holck

1 Attachment(s)

And for the record

4.2
:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
05-07-2003, 09:45 AM
macci

3.0@4109MHz on IC7 2-5-2-2 5:4 => 49.70 so far :D
screenshot coming once I finish the benching session (mark2001 over 24k too..) ;)
05-07-2003, 10:29 AM
M@tt

FYI the chart made http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9348 today :)
05-07-2003, 10:52 AM
Intronic

4.1:

http://members.lycos.nl/cncgzone/pifast.jpg

Going to try @ higher fsb later
05-07-2003, 11:09 AM
macci

http://www.solidhardware.com/macci/P43G/hex_4116_s.gif
(click for full screenshot)

3.0@4116MHz (274.4FSB, 5:4mem @220MHz 2-5-2-2)
IC7
R404 cooling
05-07-2003, 11:24 AM
M@tt

Guys you will have to bare with us a little on updates, we had 120 + results today because of the The inquirer link, it's going to take a little time to wade through that lot :D
05-07-2003, 11:32 AM
Teus

0m56s - Teus - xp1700+ @ 1995 (10.5*190) - DDR PC3500
05-07-2003, 03:00 PM
hipro5

GOOD WORK macci...... :toast:

Now......Let's see.......If Intel CPU's "grab" the three first places in Pi-fast bench , then we have to CHANGE the Version bench to the V.4.2 one.......We have spent enough time with this V.4.1 one which WAS good for the AMD's CPU's.....We HAVE to be "equal".....We have passed some months with V.4.1 and NOW we have to pass some months with V.4.2 .....AM I wrong???..... :)
05-08-2003, 01:03 PM
Tom Holck

1 Attachment(s)

Hi Macci

Quote:

Originally posted by macci
3.0@4109MHz on IC7 2-5-2-2 5:4 => 49.70 so far :D
screenshot coming once I finish the benching session (mark2001 over 24k too..) ;)

:rolleyes:
Nice job, but tell me, I now You have tried AlbatronPX865PE pro too, how can IC7 bee so mutch faster than Albatron. Du you sink, that it is the difference between 875 versus 865 ??

Here is my best so far with Albatron
3.0@4162 on AlbatronPX865PE 2-5-2-2 (444) => 50.06
05-09-2003, 05:39 AM
macci

Yup the chipset is making the difference here.

its almost 1000Marks in 3DMArk2001
http://www.solidhardware.com/macci/P43G/875vs865pe.gif

Now I'd really like to figure out if it was possible to enable PAT on 865PE chipset. Cos if that could be done I might be using the albatron 865PE Pro too (excellent price/performance ratio) :)
05-09-2003, 02:58 PM
PMM

Tom Holck result entered depending how many submissions
arrive over the weekend it will be prob Sunday when I do the next update.

/PMM
05-15-2003, 08:15 AM
LORD

I forgot to update...... Here is one I did earlier.
Bit slow when compared to the 50 and under boy's. I'll have another one soon. With hopefully a higher fsb....:)

http://www.bigbutton.com.au/~lord/HP...-2226_5180.jpg

[LORD EDIT: Wrong pic]
05-19-2003, 06:09 PM
Nikita

8RDA+ Rev1.1 12x220 DC Mode

http://www.hpautoelectrics.com/OverC...e%20Stable.JPG
05-21-2003, 01:36 AM
Nikita

Hmmm…almost 1sec with out doing a thing!!

8RDA+ Rev1.1
XP2100+@12x220 DC Mode

http://www.hpautoelectrics.com/OverC...st%2055.75.JPG
05-27-2003, 04:57 AM
Nikita

Update.....

11.5x227 DC Mode

http://www.hpautoelectrics.com/OverC...st%2055.44.JPG
05-29-2003, 09:11 AM
LORD

Can't say how much is left in this chip at the moment. We'll see how things progress....:)

http://www.bigbutton.com.au/~lord/HP...12-5_51-03.jpg
05-29-2003, 09:49 PM
Creative

1 Attachment(s)

:eek: Lord thats insane :eek:

This is my current best ; (i didnt have a screenie with just pifast in it soz guys so had to do this one ;) )

3925MHz 280fsb 2-6-3-2 5:4
05-29-2003, 10:30 PM
Nikita

Quote:

Originally posted by Creative
:eek: Lord thats insane :eek:

This is my current best ; (i didnt have a screenie with just pifast in it soz guys so had to do this one ;) )

3925MHz 280fsb 2-6-3-2 5:4

Creative, can u post a full screenie of Pifast mate!!!
With this one we can’t see if the computation it’s OK or Not!!!

Thanks.
05-29-2003, 10:54 PM
CodeRed

Quote:

Originally posted by LORD
Can't say how much is left in this chip at the moment. We'll see how things progress....:)

Excellent work there buddy. :toast:
Good to see all that hard work paying off.
05-31-2003, 01:36 PM
Tom Holck

1 Attachment(s)

almost 1 sek. Macci

Quote:

Originally posted by macci
3.0@4109MHz on IC7 2-5-2-2 5:4 => 49.70 so far :D
screenshot coming once I finish the benching session (mark2001 over 24k too..) ;)

Change my Albatron to Abit IC7 G:

:banana: :banana:

This is at 4216 Mhz Mem going 450 at 2-5-2-2
05-31-2003, 01:58 PM
PMM

Nice one Tom :slobber:

I've put it up :)
05-31-2003, 02:45 PM
hipro5

Coooollllll............What have you done Tom with the Prommie????....R505 maybe???..... :D :toast:
05-31-2003, 03:12 PM
muzz

Excellent clock there Tom !!:banana: :toast:
05-31-2003, 05:00 PM
Creative

Quote:

Originally posted by Nikita
Creative, can u post a full screenie of Pifast mate!!!
With this one we can’t see if the computation it’s OK or Not!!!

Thanks.

Will do.....Ill edit this post and just add it here when I get it done :)
05-31-2003, 05:06 PM
Jeff

Re: almost 1 sek. Macci

Quote:

Originally posted by Tom Holck
Change my Albatron to Abit IC7 G:

:banana: :banana:

This is at 4216 Mhz Mem going 450 at 2-5-2-2

Incredible time there Tom! :slobber: :toast: ;)
05-31-2003, 06:47 PM
Creative

1 Attachment(s)

PiFast.....3925mhz.....280fsb.....2-6-3-2.....5:4 mode

Cheers :)

ps
hope this is now sufficient :)

pps
Also got a new time while running again :D
heeehe
06-07-2003, 06:40 AM
Tom Holck

1 Attachment(s)

Improving Pifast 48.45

Still 4216 Mhz. now memsettings 2-5-2-2 fast...
And an extra fan.
can almost do 4225 freese at 0..

:D :D
06-07-2003, 09:30 AM
PMM

Better push m8y I have a 4500mhz result sitting in me database ;) awaiting validating.... shame he gave me a duff
Email addy :lol: not sure if its right to be honest but if it is
it ownz ya all :D
06-09-2003, 11:19 AM
hipro5

JUST......Testing......NOT finished YET......... :D

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/P..._49.06_png.png
06-10-2003, 04:36 AM
Tom Holck

Hip Hip Hipro Hurra

Quote:

Originally posted by hipro5
JUST......Testing......NOT finished YET......... :D

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/P..._49.06_png.png

Nice work there Hipro5

I am also feeling lonely on the top

:D:

:toast:
06-10-2003, 05:22 AM
hipro5

Re: Hip Hip Hipro Hurra

Quote:

Originally posted by Tom Holck
Nice work there Hipro5

I am also feeling lonely on the top

:D:

:toast:

Thanks Tom......a LOT.......... ;)

I think that it whould be better IF I could run my Ram at Cas 2-5-2-2 and not at 2-5-3-2 that I did......I'll Modd the mobo "different" so as to get 3.2-3.3Vmem and run at most aggressive timings..... :D
06-10-2003, 05:36 AM
Estide

No comment :)
06-10-2003, 09:27 AM
hipro5

Ooooopppppsssss........ Look who's first(for the time been) at Pi-fast........:toast: :banana: :D

FINALLY with Cas 2-5-2-2 .......

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/P..._48.35_png.png
06-10-2003, 09:42 AM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally posted by hipro5
Ooooopppppsssss........ Look who's first(for the time been) at Pi-fast........:toast: :banana: :D

FINALLY with Cas 2-5-2-2 .......

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/P..._48.35_png.png

nice score :toast:
06-10-2003, 10:16 AM
cpulloverclock

hipro u can use ur P4@4.2 with other bench like cpumark, sandra cpu (HP enabled) ...?
06-10-2003, 10:45 AM
hipro5

Thanks guys....... :toast:

I can use it for almost EVERYTHING at that speed EXCEPT S-Sandra Arithmetic with th HT enabled......I can do this only at this frequency and a litlle bit more than this.......;)

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/P...c_4144_png.png
06-10-2003, 11:34 AM
Petrus

P42.8C@4097MHz Corsair XMS3500 4:5 2-2-2-5

http://clarisseau.homestead.com/file...us-pifast-.gif
06-10-2003, 12:01 PM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally posted by hipro5
Thanks guys....... :toast:

I can use it for almost EVERYTHING at that speed EXCEPT S-Sandra Arithmetic with th HT enabled......I can do this only at this frequency and a litlle bit more than this.......;)

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/P...c_4144_png.png

thx ;)
06-10-2003, 09:45 PM
Estide

@hipro5 wich Ram you use zo get 276FSB?!? An whith wich Bandwith?!?

ThX Estide
06-10-2003, 11:56 PM
[NH]Woxxman

Quote:

Originally posted by hipro5
Ooooopppppsssss........ Look who's first(for the time been) at Pi-fast........:toast: :banana: :D

FINALLY with Cas 2-5-2-2 .......

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/P..._48.35_png.png

That's one great result Hipro5! Have been wondering when the bandwidth king would really enter the Canterwood scene. ;)

As for memory bandwidth.. can we expect some results rivalling that of Maccis?
Would love to see some buffered 7000+ and unbuffered 4000+ scores!

Anyways, keep up the great work Hipro5! :toast:
06-11-2003, 02:19 AM
hipro5

Quote:

Originally posted by Estide
@hipro5 wich Ram you use zo get 276FSB?!? An whith wich Bandwith?!?

ThX Estide

I use 2 x 256Mb Kingston Value Ram DDR400(PC3200)with Winbond BH-5 chips onboard at 3.05-07 Vmem with(now) Cas 2-2-2-5........The Bandwidth is about 6200MB/s in S-Sandra.......
06-11-2003, 02:21 AM
hipro5

Quote:

Originally posted by [NH]Woxxman
That's one great result Hipro5! Have been wondering when the bandwidth king would really enter the Canterwood scene. ;)

As for memory bandwidth.. can we expect some results rivalling that of Maccis?
Would love to see some buffered 7000+ and unbuffered 4000+ scores!

Anyways, keep up the great work Hipro5! :toast:

Thanks man...... :toast:

As for Memory Bandwidth benchies......I'm not interesteed for the time been.....Perhaps later on I'll get a P4 2.4GHz and try it....... ;)
06-11-2003, 02:22 AM
hipro5

Quote:

Originally posted by Petrus
P42.8C@4097MHz Corsair XMS3500 4:5 2-2-2-5

http://clarisseau.homestead.com/file...us-pifast-.gif

That's COOOOLLLLL Petrus with the P4 2.8GHz.......Good Mem bandwidth as well I think....... ;) :toast:
06-11-2003, 03:15 AM
Estide

Thx hipro5

I will get the kingston 2700 with bh6 chips... I hope that these chips will go higher then my Twinmos Winbond bh5....

CyA
06-11-2003, 03:20 AM
[NH]Woxxman

Quote:

Originally posted by hipro5
Thanks man...... :toast:

As for Memory Bandwidth benchies......I'm not interesteed for the time been.....Perhaps later on I'll get a P4 2.4GHz and try it....... ;)

Ok I understand. :)

And as you say, you will need a nice 2.4C to get those results. But I'm not the one to complain about a 48.35 run at pifast... :D

Petrus: That's some great score you got there man! Now go and break that 49 sec barrier :toast:
06-11-2003, 03:24 AM
hipro5

Quote:

Originally posted by Estide
Thx hipro5

I will get the kingston 2700 with bh6 chips... I hope that these chips will go higher then my Twinmos Winbond bh5....

CyA

IF you feed them with Vmem,they will "rock".......Try to find "W248" or "W251" production date.....This is written below the Winbond logo....... ;)
06-11-2003, 03:29 AM
NoStra

Done some benches...

Dual Channel 2-6-2-2

http://213.51.192.130/2464mhz224mhz.jpg
06-11-2003, 03:33 AM
Estide

I'm very happy that I find Kingston Bh6 in Germany so to become a "stepping" is too difficult... :( maybe I have great luck and I catch some W248 :) but my luck is'nt very high in the last time :(
But If the Kingston wouldn't "rock" *g* I will test the V-Data 2700 ;) :)

have a good day
Estide
06-11-2003, 05:09 AM
MrIcee

As requested, making this excellent thread sticky:)

Randi:D
06-11-2003, 07:49 AM
Petrus

Getting a litle better :) I think my Corsairs are maximized as my 3.3 line is crap: 3.09v under load :brick:

http://clarisseau.homestead.com/file...ifast48sec.gif
06-11-2003, 10:16 AM
hipro5

Oooooopppppsssss........(again) Look who has "broke" the 48sec barrier........ :D :banana:

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/P..._47.96_png.png
06-11-2003, 11:46 AM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally posted by hipro5
Oooooopppppsssss........(again) Look who has "broke" the 48sec barrier........ :D :banana:

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/P..._47.96_png.png

good job as usual
06-11-2003, 12:45 PM
sysfailur

Hipro5....ownage man! I love it!
06-12-2003, 01:29 AM
[NH]Woxxman

Quote:

Originally posted by hipro5
Oooooopppppsssss........(again) Look who has "broke" the 48sec barrier........ :D :banana:

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/P..._47.96_png.png

That's just plain mean, Petrus was about to catch up and then you go and do this... :D

What have you changed since your 48.35 sec score? The CPU speed is lower now so I guess something else has been done. :)
06-12-2003, 04:29 AM
hipro5

Thanks guys....... :D :toast:

I've changed the .......Memory modules......Now I'm with AGAIN 2 x 256Mb Kingston Value Ram DDR400(PC3200).....BUT with the CH-5 chips on board......I think that they are faster(overal in read - write)) than the BH-5 ones but they need burn-in to go BETTER......I'm still "burning-in" them........
06-14-2003, 10:37 AM
Jupiler

1 Attachment(s)

Awesome performance, hipro5. As usual :toast:

Here's my score : 50.14 sec
2.8C at 3994Mhz, P4C800
06-14-2003, 04:29 PM
hipro5

Quote:

Originally posted by Jupiler
Awesome performance, hipro5. As usual :toast:

Here's my score : 50.14 sec
2.8C at 3994Mhz, P4C800

Thanks Jupiler..... :toast:

What's holding you back and can't bench higher???.....
06-15-2003, 12:26 AM
Jupiler

Quote:

Originally posted by hipro5
Thanks Jupiler..... :toast:

What's holding you back and can't bench higher???.....

CPU I guess.
Raised the FSB by 1 Mhz and voltage by 0.25V (1.80 to 1.825V) but as soon as I started Pifast, the system rebooted.
The P4C800 overvolts like crazy and I don't wanna kill the cpu.
Seems like 4Ghz is a magic barrier that this sucker can't/won't pass. :mad:
35sec in SuperPi, BTW ;)

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:40 PM.

XtremeSystems